Estimating retention benchmarks for salvage logging to protect biodiversity.


Journal

Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 09 2020
Historique:
received: 11 03 2020
accepted: 19 08 2020
entrez: 22 9 2020
pubmed: 23 9 2020
medline: 9 10 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Forests are increasingly affected by natural disturbances. Subsequent salvage logging, a widespread management practice conducted predominantly to recover economic capital, produces further disturbance and impacts biodiversity worldwide. Hence, naturally disturbed forests are among the most threatened habitats in the world, with consequences for their associated biodiversity. However, there are no evidence-based benchmarks for the proportion of area of naturally disturbed forests to be excluded from salvage logging to conserve biodiversity. We apply a mixed rarefaction/extrapolation approach to a global multi-taxa dataset from disturbed forests, including birds, plants, insects and fungi, to close this gap. We find that 75 ± 7% (mean ± SD) of a naturally disturbed area of a forest needs to be left unlogged to maintain 90% richness of its unique species, whereas retaining 50% of a naturally disturbed forest unlogged maintains 73 ± 12% of its unique species richness. These values do not change with the time elapsed since disturbance but vary considerably among taxonomic groups.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32958767
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18612-4
pii: 10.1038/s41467-020-18612-4
pmc: PMC7505835
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

4762

Références

Seidl, R., Schelhaas, M.-J., Rammer, W. & Verkerk, P. J. Increasing forest disturbances in Europe and their impact on carbon storage. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 806–810 (2014).
pubmed: 25737744 pmcid: 4340567
Kurz, W. et al. Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nature 452, 987–990 (2008).
pubmed: 18432244
Turner, M. G. Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world. Ecology 91, 2833–2849 (2010).
pubmed: 21058545
Müller, J. et al. Increasing disturbance demands new policies to conserve intact forest. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12449 (2019).
Lindenmayer, D., Burton, P. J. & Franklin, J. F. Salvage Logging and its Ecological Consequences. (Island Press, 2008).
Leverkus, A. B. et al. Salvage logging effects on regulating ecosystem services and fuel loads. Front. Ecol. Environ. 18, 391–400 (2020).
Thorn, S. et al. Impacts of salvage logging on biodiversity-a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 279–289 (2018).
pubmed: 29276308
Cobb, T. P. et al. Effects of postfire salvage logging on deadwood-associated beetles. Conserv. Biol. 25, 94–104 (2011).
pubmed: 20735453
Leverkus, A. B., Lindenmayer, D. B., Thorn, S. & Gustafsson, L. Salvage logging in the world’s forests: Interactions between natural disturbance and logging need recognition. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 1140–1154 (2018).
Morissette, J. L., Cobb, T. P., Brigham, R. M. & James, P. C. The response of boreal forest songbird communities to fire and post-fire harvesting. Can. J. Res. Can. Rech. 32, 2169–2183 (2002).
Georgiev, K. B. et al. Salvage logging changes the taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional successional trajectories of forest bird communities. J. Appl. Ecol. 1365-2664, 13599 (2020).
Lindenmayer, D. B., Mcburney, L., Blair, D., Wood, J. & Banks, S. C. From unburnt to salvage logged: quantifying bird responses to different levels of disturbance severity. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 1626–1636 (2018).
Blair, D. P., McBurney, L. M., Blanchard, W., Banks, S. C. & Lindenmayer, D. B. Disturbance gradient shows logging affects plant functional groups more than fire. Ecol. Appl. 26, 2280–2301 (2016).
pubmed: 27755744
Noss, R. F. & Lindenmayer, D. B. The ecological effects of salvage logging after natural disturbance. Conserv. Biol. 20, 946–948 (2006).
Hutto, R. L. Toward meaningful snag-management guidelines for postfire salvage logging in North American conifer forests. Conserv. Biol. 20, 984–993 (2006).
pubmed: 16922215
Hutto, R. L. The ecological importance of severe wildfires: some like it hot. Ecol. Appl. 18, 1827–1834 (2008).
pubmed: 19263880
Thorn, S., Müller, J. & Leverkus, A. B. Preventing European forest diebacks. Science 365, 1388.2–1388 (2019).
Stokstad, E. Salvage logging research continues to generate sparks. Science 311, 761 (2006).
pubmed: 16469889
Franklin, J. F. et al. Threads of continuity: ecosystem disturbances, biological legacies and ecosystem recovery. Conserv. Biol. Pract. 1, 8–16 (2000).
Lindenmayer, D., Thorn, S. & Banks, S. Please do not disturb ecosystems further. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0031 (2017).
Burivalova, Z., Şekercioğlu, Ç. H. & Koh, L. P. Thresholds of logging intensity to maintain tropical forest biodiversity. Curr. Biol. 24, 1893–1898 (2014).
pubmed: 25088557
França, F. M., Frazão, F. S., Korasaki, V., Louzada, J. & Barlow, J. Identifying thresholds of logging intensity on dung beetle communities to improve the sustainable management of Amazonian tropical forests. Biol. Conserv. 216, 115–122 (2017).
Gustafsson, L. et al. Retention forestry to maintain multifunctional forests: a world perspective. Bioscience 62, 633–645 (2012).
Schmiegelow, F. K. A., Stepnisky, D. P., Stambaugh, C. A. & Koivula, M. Reconciling salvage logging of boreal forests with a natural-disturbance management model. Conserv. Biol. 20, 971–983 (2006).
pubmed: 16922214
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, F. Forest Damages Prevention Act (1087/2013). (2013).
De Grandpré, L. et al. Incorporating insect and wind disturbances in a natural disturbance-based management framework for the boreal forest. Forests 9, 1–20 (2018).
Chao, A., Colwell, R. K., Gotelli, N. J. & Thorn, S. Proportional mixture of two rarefaction/extrapolation curves to forecast biodiversity changes under landscape transformation. Ecol. Lett. 22, 1913–1922 (2019).
pubmed: 31385450
Anderson, M. J. et al. Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol. Lett. 14, 19–28 (2011).
pubmed: 21070562
Dornelas, M. et al. Assemblage time series reveal biodiversity change but not systematic loss. Science 344, 296–299 (2014).
pubmed: 24744374
Thorn, S. et al. Rare species, functional groups, and evolutionary lineages drive successional trajectories in disturbed forests. Ecology 0, 1–8 (2020).
Hyvärinen, E., Kouki, J. & Martikainen, P. Fire and green-tree retention in conservation of red-listed and rare deadwood-dependent beetles in Finnish boreal forests. Conserv. Biol. 20, 1711–1719 (2006).
pubmed: 17181806
Fedrowitz, K. et al. Can retention forestry help conserve biodiversity? A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 1669–1679 (2014).
pubmed: 25552747 pmcid: 4277688
Entling, W., Schmidt, M. H., Bacher, S., Brandl, R. & Nentwig, W. Niche properties of Central European spiders: Shading, moisture and the evolution of the habitat niche. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 16, 440–448 (2007).
Swanson, M. E. et al. The forgotten stage of forest succession: early-successional ecosystems on forest sites. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 117–125 (2011).
Lindenmayer, D. B. & Ough, K. Salvage logging in the montane ash eucalypt forests of the Central Highlands of Victoria and its potential impacts on biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 20, 1005–1015 (2006).
pubmed: 16922217
Banks-Leite, C. et al. Assessing the utility of statistical adjustments for imperfect detection in tropical conservation science. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 849–859 (2014).
pubmed: 25177046 pmcid: 4144333
Kortmann, M. et al. Beauty and the beast: how a bat utilizes forests shaped by outbreaks of an insect pest. Anim. Conserv. 21, 21–30 (2018).
Mikoláš, M. et al. Mixed-severity natural disturbances promote the occurrence of an endangered umbrella species in primary forests. Ecol. Manag. 405, 210–218 (2017).
Leverkus, A. B., Gustafsson, L., Rey Benayas, J. M. & Castro, J. Does post-disturbance salvage logging affect the provision of ecosystem services? A systematic review protocol. Environ. Evid. 4, 16 (2015).
Hutto, R. L. & Young, J. Regional landbird monitoring: perspectives from the Northern Rocky Mountains. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 30, 738–750 (2002).
Zmihorski, M. The effect of windthrow and its management on breeding bird communities in a managed forest. Biodivers. Conserv. 19, 1871–1882 (2010).
Thorn, S. et al. Changes in the dominant assembly mechanism drive species loss caused by declining resources. Ecol. Lett. 19, 163–170 (2016).
pubmed: 26612779
Leverkus, A. B. et al. Salvage logging effects on regulating and supporting ecosystem services–a systematic map. Can. J. Res. 18, 1–18 (2018).
Mehr, M., Brandl, R., Kneib, T. & Müller, J. The effect of bark beetle infestation and salvage logging on bat activity in a national park. Biodivers. Conserv. 21, 2775–2786 (2012).
Fontaine, J. B., Donato, D. C., Robinson, W. D., Law, B. E. & Kauffman, J. B. Bird communities following high-severity fire: response to single and repeat fires in a mixed-evergreen forest, Oregon, USA. Ecol. Manag. 257, 1496–1504 (2009).
Cahall, R. E. & Hayes, J. P. Influences of postfire salvage logging on forest birds in the Eastern Cascades, Oregon, USA. Ecol. Manag. 257, 1119–1128 (2009).
Castro, J., Moreno-Rueda, G. & Hódar, J. Experimental test of postfire management in pine forests: impact of salvage logging versus partial cutting and nonintervention on bird-species assemblages. Conserv. Biol. 24, 810–819 (2010).
pubmed: 20015262
Rost, J., Clavero, M., Brotons, L. & Pons, P. The effect of postfire salvage logging on bird communities in Mediterranean pine forests: the benefits for declining species. J. Appl. Ecol. 49, 644–651 (2012).
Zmihorski, M. et al. Early post-fire bird community in European boreal forest: comparing salvage-logged with non-intervention areas. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 18, e00636 (2019).
Choi, C. Y., Lee, E. J., Nam, H. Y. & Lee, W. S. Effects of postfire logging on bird populations and communities in burned forests. J. Korean . Soc. 96, 115–123 (2007).
Lee, E.-J., Lee, W.-S., Son, S. H. & Rhim, S.-J. Differences in bird communities in postfire silvicultural practices stands within pine forest of South Korea. Landsc. Ecol. Eng. 7, 137–143 (2011).
Koivula, M. & Spence, J. R. Effects of post-fire salvage logging on boreal mixed-wood ground beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Ecol. Manag. 236, 102–112 (2006).
Wermelinger, B. et al. Impact of windthrow and salvage-logging on taxonomic and functional diversity of forest arthropods. Ecol. Manag. 391, 9–18 (2017).
Hernández-Hernández, R., Castro, J., Del Arco Aguilar, M., Fernández-López, Á. B. & González-Mancebo, J. M. Post-fire salvage logging imposes a new disturbance that retards succession: the case of bryophyte communities in a Macaronesian laurel forest. Forests 8, 1–16 (2017).
Thorn, S. et al. Guild-specific responses of forest Lepidoptera highlight conservation-oriented forest management – implications from conifer-dominated forests. Ecol. Manag. 337, 41–47 (2015).
Durska, E. Effects of disturbances on scuttle flies (Diptera: Phoridae) in Pine Forests. Biodivers. Conserv. 22, 1991–2021 (2013).
Donato, D. C., Fontaine, J. B., Kauffman, J. B., Robinson, D. & Law, B. E. Fuel mass and forest structure following stand-replacement fire and post-fire logging in a mixed-evergreen forest. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 22, 652–666 (2013).
Kurulok, S. E. & Macdonald, S. E. Impacts of postfire salvage logging on understory plant communities of the boreal mixedwood forest 2 and 34 years after disturbance. Can. J. Res. 37, 2637–2651 (2007).
Macdonald, S. E. Effects of partial post-fire salvage harvesting on vegetation communities in the boreal mixedwood forest region of northeastern Alberta, Canada. Ecol. Manag. 239, 21–31 (2007).
Fornwalt, P. J. et al. Short-term understory plant community responses to salvage logging in beetle-affected lodgepole pine forests. Ecol. Manag. 409, 84–93 (2018).
Waldron, K., Ruel, J.-C., Gauthier, S., De Grandpré, L. & Peterson, C. J. Effects of post-windthrow salvage logging on microsites, plant composition and regeneration. Appl. Veg. Sci. 17, 323–337 (2014).
Leverkus, A. B., Lorite, J., Navarro, F. B., Sánchez-Cañete, E. P. & Castro, J. Post-fire salvage logging alters species composition and reduces cover, richness, and diversity in Mediterranean plant communities. J. Environ. Manag. 133, 323–331 (2014).
Chao, A. et al. Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol. Monogr. 84, 45–67 (2014).
Colwell, R. K. et al. Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation and comparison of assemblages. J. Plant Ecol. 5, 3–21 (2012).
Wood, S. N., Pya, N. & Säfken, B. Smoothing parameter and model selection for general smooth models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 111, 1548–1563 (2016).
Dornelas, M. et al. BioTIME: a database of biodiversity time series for the Anthropocene. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 760–786 (2018).
pubmed: 30147447 pmcid: 6099392
Olson, D. M. et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. Bioscience 51, 933 (2001).

Auteurs

Simon Thorn (S)

Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Glashüttenstr. 5, 96181, Rauhenebrach, Germany. simon@thornonline.de.

Anne Chao (A)

Institute of Statistics, National Tsing Hua University, Hsin-Chu, 30043, Taiwan.

Kostadin B Georgiev (KB)

Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Glashüttenstr. 5, 96181, Rauhenebrach, Germany.
Bavarian Forest National Park, Freyunger Str. 2, 94481, Grafenau, Germany.

Jörg Müller (J)

Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Glashüttenstr. 5, 96181, Rauhenebrach, Germany.
Bavarian Forest National Park, Freyunger Str. 2, 94481, Grafenau, Germany.

Claus Bässler (C)

Department of Biodiversity Conservation, Goethe University Frankfurt, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Institute for Ecology, Evolution and Diversity, Max-von-Laue-Str. 13, D-60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

John L Campbell (JL)

Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, 321 Richardson Hall, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.

Jorge Castro (J)

Department of Ecology, University of Granada, Campus Fuentenueva s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain.

Yan-Han Chen (YH)

Institute of Statistics, National Tsing Hua University, Hsin-Chu, 30043, Taiwan.

Chang-Yong Choi (CY)

Department of Agriculture, Forestry, and Bioresources, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea.

Tyler P Cobb (TP)

Royal Alberta Museum, Edmonton, AB, T5J 0G2, Canada.

Daniel C Donato (DC)

School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.

Ewa Durska (E)

Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wilcza 64, 00-679, Warsaw, Poland.

Ellen Macdonald (E)

Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2H1, Canada.

Heike Feldhaar (H)

Department of Animal Ecology I, Bayreuth Center for Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, 95447, Bayreuth, Germany.

Joseph B Fontaine (JB)

Environmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia.

Paula J Fornwalt (PJ)

USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 240 West Prospect Road, Fort Collins, CO, 80526, USA.

Raquel María Hernández Hernández (RMH)

Department of Botany, Ecology and Plant Physiology, Universidad de La Laguna, 38200, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.

Richard L Hutto (RL)

Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA.

Matti Koivula (M)

Natural Resources Institute (LUKE), P. O. Box 2, FI-00791, Helsinki, Finland.

Eun-Jae Lee (EJ)

Urban Planning Research Group, Daejeon Sejong Research Institute, Daejeon, 34863, Korea.

David Lindenmayer (D)

Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.

Grzegorz Mikusiński (G)

Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences SLU, SE-730 91, Riddarhyttan, Sweden.
School for Forest Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences SLU, Box 43, SE-739 21, Skinnskatteberg, Sweden.

Martin K Obrist (MK)

WSL Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.

Michal Perlík (M)

Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branisovska 1760, 37005, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Branisovska 31, 37005, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.

Josep Rost (J)

Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Girona. Facultat de Ciències, Carrer Maria Aurèlia Capmany, Campus de Montilivi, 17003, Girona, Catalonia, Spain.

Kaysandra Waldron (K)

Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, 1055 rue du P.E.P.S., P.O. Box 10380, Stn. Sainte-Foy, Québec, QC, G1V 4C7, Canada.

Beat Wermelinger (B)

WSL Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Forest Health and Biotic Interactions-Forest Entomology, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.

Ingmar Weiß (I)

Rehtränke, 94481, Rosenau, Germany.

Michał Żmihorski (M)

Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Stoczek 1, 17-230, Białowieża, Poland.

Alexandro B Leverkus (AB)

Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Glashüttenstr. 5, 96181, Rauhenebrach, Germany.
Department of Ecology, University of Granada, Campus Fuentenueva s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH