Force quantification and simulation of pedicle screw tract palpation using direct visuo-haptic volume rendering.
CT
Haptic rendering
Human robot interaction
Medical simulation
Virtual reality
Journal
International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery
ISSN: 1861-6429
Titre abrégé: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101499225
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
05
04
2020
accepted:
03
09
2020
pubmed:
23
9
2020
medline:
13
3
2021
entrez:
22
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We present a feasibility study for the visuo-haptic simulation of pedicle screw tract palpation in virtual reality, using an approach that requires no manual processing or segmentation of the volumetric medical data set. In a first experiment, we quantified the forces and torques present during the palpation of a pedicle screw tract in a real boar vertebra. We equipped a ball-tipped pedicle probe with a 6-axis force/torque sensor and a motion capture marker cluster. We simultaneously recorded the pose of the probe relative to the vertebra and measured the generated forces and torques during palpation. This allowed us replaying the recorded palpation movements in our simulator and to fine-tune the haptic rendering to approximate the measured forces and torques. In a second experiment, we asked two neurosurgeons to palpate a virtual version of the same vertebra in our simulator, while we logged the forces and torques sent to the haptic device. In the experiments with the real vertebra, the maximum measured force along the longitudinal axis of the probe was 7.78 N and the maximum measured bending torque was 0.13 Nm. In an offline simulation of the motion of the pedicle probe recorded during the palpation of a real pedicle screw tract, our approach generated forces and torques that were similar in magnitude and progression to the measured ones. When surgeons tested our simulator, the distributions of the computed forces and torques were similar to the measured ones; however, higher forces and torques occurred more frequently. We demonstrated the suitability of direct visual and haptic volume rendering to simulate a specific surgical procedure. Our approach of fine-tuning the simulation by measuring the forces and torques that are prevalent while palpating a real vertebra produced promising results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32959159
doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02258-0
pii: 10.1007/s11548-020-02258-0
pmc: PMC7603448
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1797-1805Subventions
Organisme : Werner Siemens-Stiftung
ID : MIRACLE
Organisme : Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
ID : 316030_133802
Références
Aoude AA, Fortin M, Figueiredo R, Jarzem P, Ouellet J, Weber MH (2015) Methods to determine pedicle screw placement accuracy in spine surgery: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 24(5):990–1004
doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3853-x
Avila RS, Sobierajski LM (1996) A haptic interaction method for volume visualization. In: Proceedings of seventh annual IEEE visualization’96. IEEE, pp 197–204
Breese R, Piazza M, Quinsey C, Blatt J (2020) Tactile skill-based neurosurgical simulators are effective and inexpensive. World Neurosurg 137:319–326
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.017
Castro WH, Halm H, Jerosch J, Malms J, Steinbeck J, Blasius S (1996) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar vertebrae. Spine 21(11):1320–1324
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199606010-00008
pubmed: 8725923
pmcid: 8725923
Donohue ML, Moquin RR, Singla A, Calancie B (2014) Is in vivo manual palpation for thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation reliable? J Neurosurg Spine 20(5):492–496
doi: 10.3171/2014.1.SPINE13197
pubmed: 24559461
pmcid: 24559461
Faludi B, Zoller EI, Gerig N, Zam A, Rauter G, Cattin PC (2019) Direct visual and haptic volume rendering of medical data sets for an immersive exploration in virtual reality. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, pp 29–37
Gang C, Haibo L, Fancai L, Weishan C, Qixin C (2012) Learning curve of thoracic pedicle screw placement using the free-hand technique in scoliosis: how many screws needed for an apprentice? Eur Spine J 21(6):1151–1156
doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2065-2
pubmed: 22081239
pmcid: 22081239
Gautschi OP, Schatlo B, Schaller K, Tessitore E (2011) Clinically relevant complications related to pedicle screw placement in thoracolumbar surgery and their management: a literature review of 35,630 pedicle screws. Neurosurg Focus 31(4):E8
doi: 10.3171/2011.7.FOCUS11168
pubmed: 21961871
pmcid: 21961871
Gelalis ID, Paschos NK, Pakos EE, Politis AN, Arnaoutoglou CM, Karageorgos AC, Ploumis A, Xenakis TA (2012) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J 21(2):247–255
doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2011-3
Gonzalvo A, Fitt G, Liew S, de la Harpe D, Turner P, Ton L, Rogers MA, Wilde PH (2009) The learning curve of pedicle screw placement: how many screws are enough? Spine 34(21):E761–E765
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b2f928
pubmed: 19934796
Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Cho YS, Riew KD (2004) Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe? Spine 29(3):333–342
doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000109983.12113.9B
pubmed: 14752359
Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C (2007) Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine 32(3):E111–E120
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000254048.79024.8b
pubmed: 17268254
Laycock SD, Day A (2007) A survey of haptic rendering techniques. In: Computer graphics forum, vol 26. Wiley Online Library, pp 50–65
Lehman RA, Potter BK, Kuklo TR, Chang AS, Polly DW, Shawen SB, Orchowski JR (2004) Probing for thoracic pedicle screw tract violation (s): is it valid? Clin Spine Surg 17(4):277–283
Mainland I, Schutkowski H, Thomson AF (2007) Macro-and micromorphological features of lifestyle differences in pigs and wild boar. Anthropozoologica 42(2):89–106
Malone HR, Syed ON, Downes MS, D’Ambrosio AL, Quest DO, Kaiser MG (2010) Simulation in neurosurgery: a review of computer-based simulation environments and their surgical applications. Neurosurgery 67(4):1105–1116
doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181ee46d0
pubmed: 20881575
Mason A, Paulsen R, Babuska JM, Rajpal S, Burneikiene S, Nelson EL, Villavicencio AT (2014) The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative image guidance systems: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine 20(2):196–203
doi: 10.3171/2013.11.SPINE13413
pubmed: 24358998
Pearce AI, Richards RG, Milz S, Schneider E, Pearce SG (2007) Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. Eur Cell Mater 13(1):1–10
pubmed: 17334975
Proietti T, Crocher V, Roby-Brami A, Jarrasse N (2016) Upper-limb robotic exoskeletons for neurorehabilitation: a review on control strategies. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 9:4–14
doi: 10.1109/RBME.2016.2552201
pubmed: 27071194
pmcid: 27071194
Ranade A, Samdani AF, Williams R, Barne K, McGirt MJ, Ramos G, Betz RR (2009) Feasibility and accuracy of pedicle screws in children younger than eight years of age. Spine 34(26):2907–2911
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b77af3
pubmed: 20010398
Ren J, Patel RV, McIsaac KA, Guiraudon G, Peters TM (2008) Dynamic 3-D virtual fixtures for minimally invasive beating heart procedures. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27(8):1061–1070
doi: 10.1109/TMI.2008.917246
pubmed: 18672424
Ruikar DD, Hegadi RS, Santosh K (2018) A systematic review on orthopedic simulators for psycho-motor skill and surgical procedure training. J Med Syst 42(9):168
doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1019-1
pubmed: 30073548
Sedory DM, Crawford JJ, Topp RF (2011) The reliability of the ball-tipped probe for detecting pedicle screw tract violations prior to instrumenting the thoracic and lumbar spine. Spine 36(6):E447–E453
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181dbfe40
pubmed: 21178848
Tian NF, Huang QS, Zhou P, Zhou Y, Wu RK, Lou Y, Xu HZ (2011) Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Spine J 20(6):846–859
doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1577-5
pubmed: 20862593
Verma R, Krishan S, Haendlmayer K, Mohsen A (2010) Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies including 5,992 pedicle screws. Eur Spine J 19(3):370–375
doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1258-4
pubmed: 20052504
pmcid: 2899753
Vieweg U, Grochulla F (2012) Manual of spine surgery. Springer, Berlin
doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-22682-3