Descriptive study of the histopathological subtypes and programmed death-ligand 1 in metaplastic breast carcinoma.


Journal

The breast journal
ISSN: 1524-4741
Titre abrégé: Breast J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9505539

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2020
Historique:
received: 28 06 2020
revised: 28 08 2020
accepted: 01 09 2020
pubmed: 23 9 2020
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 22 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma (MBC) is a rare heterogeneous group of tumors, the incidence of which is less than 1% of breast tumors. These are a unique set of tumors with varying subtypes, poor prognosis, and an increased chance of distant metastasis. We aimed to study the clinical, histomorphological, and immunohistochemical (IHC) features of Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma (MBC). This was a descriptive study of cases diagnosed as MBC at a tertiary care center in Southern India from January 2015 to December 2019. A total of 20 cases were diagnosed whose clinical, histomorphological, and IHC features were studied. PD-L1and CD8 IHC were performed and analyzed in 12 cases. The median age of presentation was 50 years. Seventy percent (14/20) patients were postmenopausal women. On excision, 75% (15/20) showed mixed typed MBC, the remainder showing epithelial type MBC. Metastasis to axillary lymph node was seen only in 20% (4/20) of the cases. Thirty percent (6/20) of the cases belonged to stage 3 disease and 5% (1/20) of the cases belonged to stage 4 disease with liver metastasis. Estrogen receptor (ER), Progesterone receptor (PR) were negative in all the cases, Her2neu was positive in three cases. Ki67 labeling index was greater than 14% in all the cases. PD-L1was positive in 41.5% of the cases and intratumoral CD8 positive lymphocytes were increased in 83.3% of the cases. MBCs are tumors occurring in elderly postmenopausal women, presenting with large tumor size, have lesser chances of lymph node metastasis, and a higher chance of recurrence and hematogenous spread. They are negative for ER, PR, Her-2 neu, with a high Ki67 index and a strong PDL-1 expression.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32959535
doi: 10.1111/tbj.14056
doi:

Substances chimiques

B7-H1 Antigen 0
Biomarkers, Tumor 0
Receptors, Estrogen 0
Receptors, Progesterone 0
Receptor, ErbB-2 EC 2.7.10.1

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2371-2375

Informations de copyright

© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

Joneja U, Vranic S, Swensen J, Feldman R, Chen W, Kimbrough J, Xiao N, Reddy S, Palazzo J, Gatalica Z. Comprehensive profiling of metaplastic breast carcinomas reveals frequent overexpression of programmed death-ligand 1. J Clin Pathol. 2017;70:255-259.
Tavassoli FA. Classification of metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. Pathol Annu. 1992;27:89-119.
Beatty JD, Atwood M, Tickman R, Reiner M. Metaplastic breast cancer: clinical significance. Am J Surg. 2006;191:657-664.
Chao TC, Wang CS, Chen SC, Chen MF. Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. J Surg Oncol. 1999;71:220-225.
Rayson D, Adjei AA, Suman VJ, Wold LE, Ingle JN. Metaplastic breast cancer: prognosis and response to systemic therapy. Ann Oncol. 1999;10:413-419.
Kaufman MW, Marti JR, Gallager HS, Hoehn JL. Carcinoma of the breast with pseudosarcomatous metaplasia. Cancer. 1984;53:1908-1917.
Park HS, Park S, Kim JH, Lee JH, Choi SY, Park BW, et al. Clinicopathologic features and outcomes of metaplastic breast carcinoma: Comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Yonsei Med J. 2010;51:864-869.
Pezzi CM, Patel-Parekh L, Cole K, Franko J, Klimberg VS, Bland K. Characteristics and treatment of metaplastic breast cancer: analysis of 892 cases from the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:166-173.
Wargotz ES, Deos PH, Norris HJ. Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast, II: spindle cell carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 1989;20:732-740.
McKinnon E, Xiao P. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015;139(6):819-822.
McMullen ER, Zoumberos NA, Kleer CG. Metaplastic breast carcinoma: update on histopathology and molecular alterations. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019;143:1492-1496.
Schwartz TL, Mogal H, Papageorgiou C, Veerapong J, Hsueh EC. Metaplastic breast cancer: histologic characteristics, prognostic factors and systemic treatment strategies. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2013;2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/2162-3619-2-31
Xin J, Dajun Y, Chenxu G, Xiaomeng G, Nan L, Yan Z. Metaplastic breast carcinoma: a clinical analysis of 26 cases. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018;11:2112-2117.
Kinnon MC, Tseng WH, Martinez SR. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast. J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018;2:45-49.
Lai H-W, Tseng L-M, Chang T-W, et al. The prognostic significance of metaplastic carcinoma of the breast (MCB)-a case controlled comparison study with infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Breast. 2013;22:968-973.
Altaf FJ, Mokhtar GA, Emam E, et al. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: an immunohistochemical study. Diagn Pathol. 2014;9:139.
Gazinska P, Grigoriadis A, Brown JP, Millis RR, Mera A, Gillett CE, Holmberg LH, Tutt AN, Pinder SE. Comparison of basal-like triple-negative breast cancer defined by morphology, immunohistochemistry and transcriptional profiles. Modern Pathol. 2013;26:955-966.
Lim KH, Oh DY, Chie EK, Han W, Im SA, Kim TY, Park IA, Noh DY, Ha SW, Bang YJ. Metaplastic breast carcinoma: clinicopathologic features and prognostic value of triple negativity. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40:112-118.
Afkhami M, Schmolze D, Yost SE, Frankel PH, Dagis A, Amanam IU, Telatar M, Nguyen K, Yu KW, Luu T, Pillai R. Mutation and immune profiling of metaplastic breast cancer: Correlation with survival. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0224726.
Dill EA, Gru AA, Atkins KA, Friedman LA, Moore ME, Bullock TN, Cross JV, Dillon PM, Mills AM. PD-L1 expression and intratumoral heterogeneity across breast cancer subtypes and stages. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41:334-342.
Mittendorf EA, Philips AV, Meric-Bernstam F, et al. PD-L1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2:361-370.
Adams S. Dramatic response of metaplastic breast cancer to chemo-immunotherapy. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2017;29:1-4.

Auteurs

Norton Stephen (N)

Department of Pathology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.

SreeRekha Jinkala (S)

Department of Pathology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.

Pampa Ch Toi (P)

Department of Pathology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.

Rajesh Nachiappa Ganesh (RN)

Department of Pathology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.

Srinivas Bheemanathi Hanuman (S)

Department of Pathology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.

Bhawana Ashok Badhe (BA)

Department of Pathology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.

Debasis Gochhait (D)

Department of Pathology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.

Biswajit Dubashi (B)

Department of Medical Oncology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH