Implementation strategies used to implement nursing guidelines in daily practice: A systematic review.

Guideline adherence [MeSH] Implementation science [MeSH] Implementation strategies Nursing [MeSH] Nursing guidelines Systematic review [MeSH]

Journal

International journal of nursing studies
ISSN: 1873-491X
Titre abrégé: Int J Nurs Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0400675

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 05 02 2020
revised: 29 07 2020
accepted: 10 08 2020
pubmed: 23 9 2020
medline: 29 7 2021
entrez: 22 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Research specifically addressing implementation strategies regarding nursing guidelines is limited. The objective of this review was to provide an overview of strategies used to implement nursing guidelines in all nursing fields, as well as the effects of these strategies on patient-related nursing outcomes and guideline adherence. Ideally, the findings would help guideline developers, healthcare professionals and organizations to implement nursing guidelines in practice. Systematic review. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018104615. We searched the Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane, CINAHL and Google Scholar databases until August 2019 as well as the reference lists of relevant articles. Studies were included that described quantitative data on the effect of implementation strategies and implementation outcomes of any type of a nursing guideline in any setting. No language or date of publication restriction was used. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care taxonomy was used to categorize the implementation strategies. Studies were classified as effective if a significant change in either patient-related nursing outcomes or guideline adherence was described. Strength of the evidence was evaluated using the 'Cochrane risk of bias tool' for controlled studies, and the 'Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment form' for cohort studies. A total of 54 articles regarding 53 different guideline implementation studies were included. Fifteen were (cluster) Randomized Controlled Trials or controlled before-after studies and 38 studies had a before-after design. The topics of the implemented guidelines were diverse, mostly concerning skin care (n = 9) and infection prevention (n = 7). Studies were predominantly performed in hospitals (n = 34) and nursing homes (n = 11). Thirty studies showed a positive significant effect in either patient-related nursing outcomes or guideline adherence (68%, n = 36). The median number of implementation strategies used was 6 (IQR 4-8) per study. Educational strategies were used in nearly all studies (98.1%, n = 52), followed by deployment of local opinion leaders (54.7%, n = 29) and audit and feedback (41.5%, n = 22). Twenty-three (43.4%) studies performed a barrier assessment, nineteen used tailored strategies. A wide variety of implementation strategies are used to implement nursing guidelines. Not one single strategy, or combination of strategies, can be linked directly to successful implementation of nursing guidelines. Overall, thirty-six studies (68%) reported a positive significant effect of the implementation of guidelines on patient-related nursing outcomes or guideline adherence. Future studies should use a standardized reporting checklist to ensure a detailed description of the used implementation strategies to increase reproducibility and understanding of outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32961463
pii: S0020-7489(20)30234-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103748
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103748

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Auteurs

Denise Spoon (D)

Department of Internal Medicine, Section Nursing Science, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Room Rg-532, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands. Electronic address: d.spoon@erasmusmc.nl.

Tessa Rietbergen (T)

Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Anita Huis (A)

Radboud university medical centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Maud Heinen (M)

Radboud university medical centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Monique van Dijk (M)

Department of Internal Medicine, Section Nursing Science, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Room Rg-532, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands; Department of Paediatric Surgery and Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Leti van Bodegom-Vos (L)

Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Erwin Ista (E)

Department of Internal Medicine, Section Nursing Science, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Room Rg-532, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands; Department of Paediatric Surgery and Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH