The newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation index for acute procedural pain assessment in preterm infants.
Journal
Pediatric research
ISSN: 1530-0447
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0100714
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
received:
22
04
2020
accepted:
24
08
2020
revised:
20
08
2020
pubmed:
23
9
2020
medline:
15
1
2022
entrez:
22
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Accurate assessments of pain in hospitalized preterm infants present a major challenge in improving the short- and long-term consequences associated with painful experiences. We evaluated the ability of the newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation (NIPE) index to detect acute procedural pain in preterm infants. Different painful and stressful interventions were prospectively observed in preterm infants born at 25 + 0 to 35 + 6 weeks gestation. Pain responses were measured using the composite Premature Infant Pain Profile Revised (PIPP-R) scale, the NIPE index, and skin conductance responses (SCR). Outcome measures were correlations between the NIPE index, the PIPP-R score, and the SCR. Sensitivity/specificity analyses tested the accuracy of the NIPE index and SCR. Two hundred and fifty-four procedures were recorded in 90 preterm infants. No significant correlation was found between PIPP-R and the NIPE index. PIPP-R and SCR were positively correlated (r = 0.27, P < 0.001), with stronger correlations for painful procedures (r = 0.68, P < 0.001) and especially for skin-breaking procedures (r = 0.82, P < 0.001). The NIPE index and SCR had high sensitivity and high negative predictive values to predict PIPP-R > 10, especially for skin-breaking painful procedures. We found no significant correlation between the NIPE index and PIPP-R during routine painful or stressful procedures in preterm infants. Exposure to repetitive pain can lead to neurodevelopmental sequelae. Behavior-based pain scales have limited clinical utility, especially for preterm infants. New devices for monitoring physiological responses to pain have not been validated sufficiently in preterm infants. This study found that the NIPE index was not significantly correlated to the validated PIPP-R scale during acute procedural pain. Secondary analysis of this study showed that NIPE index and SCRs may help to exclude severe pain in preterm infants. In clinical practice, measurements of physiological parameters should be combined with behavior-based scales for multidimensional pain assessments.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Accurate assessments of pain in hospitalized preterm infants present a major challenge in improving the short- and long-term consequences associated with painful experiences. We evaluated the ability of the newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation (NIPE) index to detect acute procedural pain in preterm infants.
METHODS
Different painful and stressful interventions were prospectively observed in preterm infants born at 25 + 0 to 35 + 6 weeks gestation. Pain responses were measured using the composite Premature Infant Pain Profile Revised (PIPP-R) scale, the NIPE index, and skin conductance responses (SCR). Outcome measures were correlations between the NIPE index, the PIPP-R score, and the SCR. Sensitivity/specificity analyses tested the accuracy of the NIPE index and SCR.
RESULTS
Two hundred and fifty-four procedures were recorded in 90 preterm infants. No significant correlation was found between PIPP-R and the NIPE index. PIPP-R and SCR were positively correlated (r = 0.27, P < 0.001), with stronger correlations for painful procedures (r = 0.68, P < 0.001) and especially for skin-breaking procedures (r = 0.82, P < 0.001). The NIPE index and SCR had high sensitivity and high negative predictive values to predict PIPP-R > 10, especially for skin-breaking painful procedures.
CONCLUSIONS
We found no significant correlation between the NIPE index and PIPP-R during routine painful or stressful procedures in preterm infants.
IMPACT
Exposure to repetitive pain can lead to neurodevelopmental sequelae. Behavior-based pain scales have limited clinical utility, especially for preterm infants. New devices for monitoring physiological responses to pain have not been validated sufficiently in preterm infants. This study found that the NIPE index was not significantly correlated to the validated PIPP-R scale during acute procedural pain. Secondary analysis of this study showed that NIPE index and SCRs may help to exclude severe pain in preterm infants. In clinical practice, measurements of physiological parameters should be combined with behavior-based scales for multidimensional pain assessments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32961546
doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-01152-4
pii: 10.1038/s41390-020-01152-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1840-1847Références
Carbajal, R. et al. Epidemiology and treatment of painful procedures in neonates in intensive care units. JAMA 300, 60–70 (2008).
doi: 10.1001/jama.300.1.60
Johnston, C., Barrington, K. J., Taddio, A., Carbajal, R. & Filion, F. Pain in Canadian NICUs: have we improved over the past 12 years?. Clin. J. Pain 27, 225–232 (2011).
doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181fe14cf
Vinall, J. & Grunau, R. E. Impact of repeated procedural pain-related stress in infants born very preterm. Pediatr. Res. 75, 584–587 (2014).
doi: 10.1038/pr.2014.16
Grunau, R. E. et al. Neonatal pain, parenting stress and interaction, in relation to cognitive and motor development at 8 and 18 months in preterm infants. Pain 143, 138–146 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.02.014
Ranger, M. et al. Neonatal pain-related stress predicts cortical thickness at age 7 years in children born very preterm. PLoS ONE 8, e76702 (2013).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076702
Courtois, E. et al. Epidemiology and neonatal pain management of heelsticks in intensive care units: EPIPPAIN 2, a prospective observational study. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 59, 79–88 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.03.014
Slater, R., Cantarella, A., Franck, L., Meek, J. & Fitzgerald, M. How well do clinical pain assessment tools reflect pain in infants? PLoS Med. 5, e129 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050129 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050129
pubmed: 18578562
pmcid: 2504041
Gokulu, G. et al. Comparative heel stick study showed that newborn infants who had undergone repeated painful procedures showed increased short-term pain responses. Acta Paediatr. 105, e520–e525 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/apa.13557
Treede, R. D., Kenshalo, D. R., Gracely, R. H. & Jones, A. K. The cortical representation of pain. Pain 79, 105–111 (1999).
doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00184-5
Slater, R. et al. Premature infants display increased noxious-evoked neuronal activity in the brain compared to healthy age-matched term-born infants. Neuroimage 52, 583–589 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.253
Ranger, M., Johnston, C. C. & Anand, K. J. S. Current controversies regarding pain assessment in neonates. Semin. Perinatol. 31, 283–288 (2007).
doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2007.07.003
Roué, J.-M. et al. Multi-modal pain assessment: are near-infrared spectroscopy, skin conductance, salivary cortisol, physiologic parameters, and Neonatal Facial Coding System interrelated during venepuncture in healthy, term neonates? J. Pain Res. 11, 2257–2267 (2018).
doi: 10.2147/JPR.S165810
Munsters, J., Wallström, L., Ågren, J., Norsted, T. & Sindelar, R. Skin conductance measurements as pain assessment in newborn infants born at 22–27weeks gestational age at different postnatal age. Early Hum. Dev. 88, 21–26 (2012) .
doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.06.010
Faye, P. M. et al. Newborn infant pain assessment using heart rate variability analysis. Clin. J. Pain 26, 777–782 (2010).
doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181ed1058
Cremillieux, C., Makhlouf, A., Pichot, V., Trombert, B. & Patural, H. Objective assessment of induced acute pain in neonatology with the Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation index. Eur. J. Pain 22, 1071–1079 (2018).
doi: 10.1002/ejp.1191
Zhang, K. et al. Newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation (NIPE) as a predictor of hemodynamic response in children younger than 2 years under general anesthesia: an observational pilot study. BMC Anesthesiol. 19, 98 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0774-y .
doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0774-y
pubmed: 31185928
pmcid: 6560820
Lindh, V., Wiklund, U. & Håkansson, S. Heel lancing in term new-born infants: an evaluation of pain by frequency domain analysis of heart rate variability. Pain 80, 143–148 (1999).
doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00215-2
Lindh, V., Wiklund, U., Sandman, P.-O. & Håkansson, S. Assessment of acute pain in preterm infants by evaluation of facial expression and frequency domain analysis of heart rate variability. Early Hum. Dev. 48, 131–142 (1997) .
doi: 10.1016/S0378-3782(96)01851-8
Lindh, V., Wiklund, U. & Håkansson, S. Assessment of the effect of EMLA® during venipuncture in the newborn by analysis of heart rate variability. Pain 86, 247–254 (2000).
Walas, W. et al. Newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation index for the assessment of procedural pain in nonanesthetized infants: a multicenter pilot study. Am. J. Perinatol. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709458 (2020).
Weissman, A., Aranovitch, M., Blazer, S. & Zimmer, E. Z. Heel-lancing in newborns: behavioral and spectral analysis assessment of pain control methods. Pediatrics 124, e921–e926 (2009).
doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0598
Butruille, L. et al. Development of a pain monitoring device focused on newborn infant applications: the NeoDoloris project. IRBM 36, 80–85 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.irbm.2015.01.005
Sabourdin, N. et al. Pain monitoring in anesthetized children: first assessment of skin conductance and analgesia-nociception index at different infusion rates of remifentanil. Paediatr. Anaesth. 23, 149–155 (2013).
doi: 10.1111/pan.12071
Gibbins, S. et al. Validation of the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R). Early Hum. Dev. 90, 189–193 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.01.005
Stevens, B. J. et al. The Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R): initial validation and feasibility. Clin. J. Pain 30, 238–243 (2014).
doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182906aed
Gjerstad, A. C., Wagner, K., Henrichsen, T. & Storm, H. Skin conductance versus the modified COMFORT sedation score as a measure of discomfort in artificially ventilated children. Pediatrics 122, e848–e853 (2008).
doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2545
Storm, H. Skin conductance and the stress response from heel stick in preterm infants. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 83, F143–F147 (2000).
doi: 10.1136/fn.83.2.F143
Chanques, G. et al. Analgesia nociception index for the assessment of pain in critically ill patients: a diagnostic accuracy study. Br. J. Anaesth. 119, 812–820 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/bja/aex210
Oberlander, T. F., Grunau, R. E., Pitfield, S., Whitfield, M. F. & Saul, J. P. The developmental character of cardiac autonomic responses to an acute noxious event in 4- and 8-month-old healthy infants. Pediatr. Res. 45, 519–525 (1999).
doi: 10.1203/00006450-199904010-00011
Padhye, N. S., Williams, A. L., Khattak, A. Z. & Lasky, R. E. Heart rate variability in response to pain stimulus in VLBW infants followed longitudinally during NICU stay. Dev. Psychobiol. 51, 638–649 (2009).
doi: 10.1002/dev.20399
Waxman, J. A., Pillai Riddell, R. R., Tablon, P., Schmidt, L. A. & Pinhasov, A. Development of cardiovascular indices of acute pain responding in infants: a systematic review. Pain Res. Manag. 2016, 1–15 (2016).
doi: 10.1155/2016/8458696
Storm, H. The development of a software program for analyzing skin conductance changes in preterm infants. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112, 1562–1568 (2001).
doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00573-9
Valkenburg, A. J., Niehof, S. P., van Dijk, M., Verhaar, E. J. M. & Tibboel, D. Skin conductance peaks could result from changes in vital parameters unrelated to pain. Pediatr. Res. 71, 375–379 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/pr.2011.72
Pereira-da-Silva, L. et al. Skin conductance indices discriminate nociceptive responses to acute stimuli from different heel prick procedures in infants. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 25, 796–801 (2012).
doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.587919
Harrison, D. et al. Skin conductance as a measure of pain and stress in hospitalised infants. Early Hum. Dev. 82, 603–608 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.12.008
Hernes, K. G. et al. Skin conductance changes during the first year of life in full-term infants. Pediatr. Res. 52, 837–843 (2002).
doi: 10.1203/00006450-200212000-00005