Maternal autonomy and high-risk pregnancy in Bangladesh: the mediating influences of childbearing practices and antenatal care.
Adult
Bangladesh
/ epidemiology
Female
Humans
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
/ statistics & numerical data
Personal Autonomy
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications
/ epidemiology
Pregnancy, High-Risk
Prenatal Care
/ statistics & numerical data
Reproductive Behavior
Severity of Illness Index
Young Adult
Antenatal care
Autonomy
Childbearing practices
High-risk pregnancy
Mediating effect
Journal
BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Sep 2020
22 Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
24
09
2019
accepted:
15
09
2020
entrez:
23
9
2020
pubmed:
24
9
2020
medline:
8
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Maternal, infant and neonatal mortality rates are high in Bangladesh. Certain childbearing practices and poor utilisation of antenatal care services make Bangladeshi women more vulnerable to experience poor health during pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Also, women in Bangladesh remain considerably subordinate to men in almost all aspects of their lives, from education and work opportunities to healthcare utilisation. This study investigates the severity of health complications during pregnancy in relation to women's autonomy, and how childbearing practices and utilisation of antenatal care mediate this relationship. Data from the most recent Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) is used in this study. Multinomial regression models (MLRM) are employed to examine the relationship between the outcome variable - high risk pregnancy, and explanatory variables - women's autonomy, childbearing practices and use of antenatal care. In Bangladesh, about 41.5% of women experienced high-risk pregnancies involving multiple health complications. Findings showed that women's autonomy in decision-making, freedom of movement and economic autonomy were significantly associated with high-risk pregnancies. However, women's autonomy in physical mobility in particular did so only through the mediating factors of maternal childbearing practices and antenatal care. Specifically, both early and delayed childbearing and shorter birth interval increased the likelihood of high-risk (multiple complications) pregnancies by about 30% and 31% respectively, high parity increased the risk by 23% and use of antenatal care decreased it by 46%. The Women's decision-making autonomy, freedom of movement and economic autonomy had significant effects on high-risk pregnancies. However, the effects were mediated by both maternal childbearing practices and use of antenatal care in a limited way. Policies and programmes aimed at improving pregnancy outcomes need to focus on all three sets of factors: women's autonomy, childbearing practices and use of antenatal care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Maternal, infant and neonatal mortality rates are high in Bangladesh. Certain childbearing practices and poor utilisation of antenatal care services make Bangladeshi women more vulnerable to experience poor health during pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Also, women in Bangladesh remain considerably subordinate to men in almost all aspects of their lives, from education and work opportunities to healthcare utilisation. This study investigates the severity of health complications during pregnancy in relation to women's autonomy, and how childbearing practices and utilisation of antenatal care mediate this relationship.
METHODS
METHODS
Data from the most recent Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) is used in this study. Multinomial regression models (MLRM) are employed to examine the relationship between the outcome variable - high risk pregnancy, and explanatory variables - women's autonomy, childbearing practices and use of antenatal care.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In Bangladesh, about 41.5% of women experienced high-risk pregnancies involving multiple health complications. Findings showed that women's autonomy in decision-making, freedom of movement and economic autonomy were significantly associated with high-risk pregnancies. However, women's autonomy in physical mobility in particular did so only through the mediating factors of maternal childbearing practices and antenatal care. Specifically, both early and delayed childbearing and shorter birth interval increased the likelihood of high-risk (multiple complications) pregnancies by about 30% and 31% respectively, high parity increased the risk by 23% and use of antenatal care decreased it by 46%.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The Women's decision-making autonomy, freedom of movement and economic autonomy had significant effects on high-risk pregnancies. However, the effects were mediated by both maternal childbearing practices and use of antenatal care in a limited way. Policies and programmes aimed at improving pregnancy outcomes need to focus on all three sets of factors: women's autonomy, childbearing practices and use of antenatal care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32962637
doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03260-9
pii: 10.1186/s12884-020-03260-9
pmc: PMC7510296
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
555Références
Popul Stud (Camb). 2008 Jul;62(2):131-54
pubmed: 18587691
Health Care Women Int. 2006 Oct;27(9):807-21
pubmed: 17060180
BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 17;12:791
pubmed: 22978705
Sociol Health Illn. 2007 Jan;29(1):1-26
pubmed: 17286703
JAMA. 2006 Apr 19;295(15):1809-23
pubmed: 16622143
Ethn Dis. 2004 Summer;14(3):322-9
pubmed: 15328932
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Oct 21;11:76
pubmed: 22018330
Matern Child Health J. 2010 Nov;14(6):988-98
pubmed: 19882240
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Jul 21;9:30
pubmed: 19622146
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Oct 16;12:111
pubmed: 23066832
Reprod Health. 2011 May 20;8:16
pubmed: 21599904
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Jan;148(1):21-6
pubmed: 19773110
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Apr;89 Suppl 1:S7-24
pubmed: 15820369
J Health Popul Nutr. 2012 Jun;30(2):172-80
pubmed: 22838159
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Dec;119(3):227-33
pubmed: 23040408
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Nov 02;11:88
pubmed: 22047209
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2001 Jan;27(1):36-41
pubmed: 12457546
Lancet. 2010 Feb 6;375(9713):490-9
pubmed: 20071021
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 May;91(5):580-6
pubmed: 22313177
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Sep;69(6):926-33
pubmed: 19656604
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Apr;89 Suppl 1:S41-9
pubmed: 15820367
Fam Plann Perspect. 2000 Jan-Feb;32(1):14-23
pubmed: 10710702
Hum Reprod. 2007 May;22(5):1264-72
pubmed: 17289684
JAMA. 2006 Apr 19;295(15):1837-8
pubmed: 16622147
Dev Change. 2011;42(2):499-528
pubmed: 21898946
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Apr;60(8):1751-65
pubmed: 15686807
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):198-203
pubmed: 16021079
J Health Popul Nutr. 2012 Jun;30(2):159-71
pubmed: 22838158
Demography. 2001 Feb;38(1):67-78
pubmed: 11227846
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Jul;31(5):404-8
pubmed: 21627423