Association between neighborhood disadvantage and fulfillment of desired postpartum sterilization.

Medicaid Neighborhood disadvantage Postpartum contraception Social determinants of health Sterilization

Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 17 02 2020
accepted: 14 09 2020
entrez: 23 9 2020
pubmed: 24 9 2020
medline: 15 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Adequacy of prenatal care is associated with fulfillment of postpartum sterilization requests, though it is unclear whether this relationship is indicative of broader social and structural determinants of health or reflects the mandatory Medicaid waiting period required before sterilization can occur. We evaluated the relationship between neighborhood disadvantage (operationalized by the Area Deprivation Index; ADI) and the likelihood of undergoing postpartum sterilization. Secondary analysis of a single-center retrospective cohort study examining 8654 postpartum patients from 2012 to 2014, of whom 1332 (15.4%) desired postpartum sterilization (as abstracted from the medical record at time of delivery hospitalization discharge) and for whom ADI could be calculated via geocoding their home address. We determined the association between ADI and sterilization completion, postpartum visit attendance, and subsequent pregnancy within 365 days of delivery via logistic regression and time to sterilization via Cox proportional hazards regression. Of the 1332 patients included in the analysis, patients living in more disadvantaged neighborhoods were more likely to be younger, more parous, delivered vaginally, Black, unmarried, not college educated, and insured via Medicaid. Compared to patients living in less disadvantaged areas, patients living in more disadvantaged areas were less likely to obtain sterilization (44.8% vs. 53.5%, OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.93), experienced greater delays in the time to sterilization (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.06-1.44), were less likely to attend postpartum care (58.9% vs 68.9%, OR 0.86, CI 0.79-0.93), and were more likely to have a subsequent pregnancy within a year of delivery (15.1% vs 10.4%, OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.10-1.94). In insurance-stratified analysis, for patients with Medicaid, but not private insurance, as neighborhood disadvantage increased, the rate of postpartum sterilization decreased. The rate of subsequent pregnancy was positively associated with neighborhood disadvantage for both Medicaid as well as privately insured patients. Living in an area with increased neighborhood disadvantage is associated with worse outcomes in terms of desired postpartum sterilization, especially for patients with Medicaid insurance. While revising the Medicaid sterilization policy is important, addressing social determinants of health may also play a powerful role in reducing inequities in fulfillment of postpartum sterilization.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Adequacy of prenatal care is associated with fulfillment of postpartum sterilization requests, though it is unclear whether this relationship is indicative of broader social and structural determinants of health or reflects the mandatory Medicaid waiting period required before sterilization can occur. We evaluated the relationship between neighborhood disadvantage (operationalized by the Area Deprivation Index; ADI) and the likelihood of undergoing postpartum sterilization.
METHODS METHODS
Secondary analysis of a single-center retrospective cohort study examining 8654 postpartum patients from 2012 to 2014, of whom 1332 (15.4%) desired postpartum sterilization (as abstracted from the medical record at time of delivery hospitalization discharge) and for whom ADI could be calculated via geocoding their home address. We determined the association between ADI and sterilization completion, postpartum visit attendance, and subsequent pregnancy within 365 days of delivery via logistic regression and time to sterilization via Cox proportional hazards regression.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of the 1332 patients included in the analysis, patients living in more disadvantaged neighborhoods were more likely to be younger, more parous, delivered vaginally, Black, unmarried, not college educated, and insured via Medicaid. Compared to patients living in less disadvantaged areas, patients living in more disadvantaged areas were less likely to obtain sterilization (44.8% vs. 53.5%, OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.93), experienced greater delays in the time to sterilization (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.06-1.44), were less likely to attend postpartum care (58.9% vs 68.9%, OR 0.86, CI 0.79-0.93), and were more likely to have a subsequent pregnancy within a year of delivery (15.1% vs 10.4%, OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.10-1.94). In insurance-stratified analysis, for patients with Medicaid, but not private insurance, as neighborhood disadvantage increased, the rate of postpartum sterilization decreased. The rate of subsequent pregnancy was positively associated with neighborhood disadvantage for both Medicaid as well as privately insured patients.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Living in an area with increased neighborhood disadvantage is associated with worse outcomes in terms of desired postpartum sterilization, especially for patients with Medicaid insurance. While revising the Medicaid sterilization policy is important, addressing social determinants of health may also play a powerful role in reducing inequities in fulfillment of postpartum sterilization.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32962666
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09540-5
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-09540-5
pmc: PMC7509918
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1440

Subventions

Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : KL2 TR000440
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : KL2TR0002547
Pays : United States

Références

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;212(6):736-9
pubmed: 25935572
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jul 15;14:227
pubmed: 25023478
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1348-1351
pubmed: 24807338
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018 Aug;5(4):782-786
pubmed: 28840519
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Jan 15;167(2):155-63
pubmed: 17989062
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018 Jul-Aug;36(4):589-594
pubmed: 29465359
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;134(6):1171-1177
pubmed: 31764726
J Addict Med. 2020 Mar/Apr;14(2):113-118
pubmed: 31149915
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 31;15(9):
pubmed: 30200368
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Jan 16;15:2
pubmed: 25591945
Health Place. 2014 Nov;30:98-106
pubmed: 25240489
Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Sep 1;148(5):475-86
pubmed: 9737560
J Vasc Surg. 2019 May;69(5):1437-1443
pubmed: 30552038
Cad Saude Publica. 2013 Aug;29(8):1664-74
pubmed: 24005931
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e033697
pubmed: 31843851
Am J Med Qual. 2018 Sep/Oct;33(5):493-501
pubmed: 29357679
Hastings Cent Rep. 1979 Oct;9(5):29-41
pubmed: 511523
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jan;54(1):87-95
pubmed: 29254556
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 26;11(10):e0159039
pubmed: 27783616
J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Feb;10(2):256-63
pubmed: 25376515
Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;25(2):120-5
pubmed: 25523896
Matern Child Health J. 2014 Feb;18(2):478-87
pubmed: 23430295
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;120(1):212-5
pubmed: 22914423
Public Health Rep. 2018 Jul/Aug;133(4):452-460
pubmed: 29750893
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 11;6(10):
pubmed: 29021267
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;210(6):526.e1-9
pubmed: 24495671
PLoS One. 2014 May 20;9(5):e98170
pubmed: 24845852
Occup Environ Med. 1999 Jan;56(1):34-40
pubmed: 10341744
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):47.e1-47.e7
pubmed: 28263752
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Sep 15;174(6):744-52
pubmed: 21771918
Chest. 2020 Apr;157(4):1021-1029
pubmed: 31862438
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oct;120(4):920-7
pubmed: 22996110
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 8;14(7):e0216350
pubmed: 31283778
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;105(4):794-9
pubmed: 15802407
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;135(2):276-283
pubmed: 31923055
Natl Health Stat Report. 2015 Nov 10;(86):1-14
pubmed: 26556545
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25(1):12-20
pubmed: 11297294
Am J Public Health. 2003 Jul;93(7):1137-43
pubmed: 12835199
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jul;60(7):712-9
pubmed: 17573987
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Jun 1;454-455:433-41
pubmed: 23563257
Contraception. 2018 Jun;97(6):559-564
pubmed: 29490290
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 9;370(2):102-4
pubmed: 24401047
J Epidemiol. 2015;25(3):254-60
pubmed: 25757802
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;58(2):409-17
pubmed: 25811128
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;129(4):e109-e116
pubmed: 28333823
Popul Health Manag. 2020 Feb;23(1):12-19
pubmed: 31207198
J Urban Health. 2006 Nov;83(6):1041-62
pubmed: 17031568

Auteurs

Kavita Shah Arora (KS)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. Kavita.Shah.Arora@gmail.com.

Mustafa Ascha (M)

Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Barbara Wilkinson (B)

School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Emily Verbus (E)

School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Mary Montague (M)

School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Jane Morris (J)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Douglas Einstadter (D)

Center for Health Care Research and Policy and the Departments of Medicine, and Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH