Testing a physical education-delivered autonomy supportive intervention to promote leisure-time physical activity in lower secondary school students: the PETALS trial.


Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 17 06 2020
accepted: 08 09 2020
entrez: 23 9 2020
pubmed: 24 9 2020
medline: 15 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Inadequate physical activity in young people is associated with several physical and mental health concerns. Physical education (PE) is a potentially viable existing network for promoting physical activity in this population. However, little research has been conducted on whether PE teachers can influence students' engagement in leisure-time physical activity. The present study therefore examined the efficacy of an intervention aimed at increasing PE teachers' autonomy support on students' leisure-time physical activity (the PETALS trial). The intervention was guided by the trans-contextual model (TCM) explaining the processes by which PE teachers' provision of autonomy support during PE promotes students' motivation and engagement in physical activity in their leisure time. The study adopted a cluster-randomized, waitlist control intervention design with randomization by school. Participants were PE teachers (N = 29, 44.83%female; M age = 42.83, SD = 9.53 yrs) and their lower secondary school students (N = 502, 43.82%female; M age = 14.52, SD = 0.71 yrs). We measured TCM constructs, including perceived autonomy support, autonomous motivation in PE and leisure time, beliefs and intentions towards leisure-time physical activity, and physical activity behavior at baseline, post-intervention, and at one-, three-, and six-months. Study hypotheses were tested through a series of ANOVAs and structural equation models using post-intervention and one-month follow-up data. We found no changes in TCM constructs or physical activity behavior in either group at post-intervention or at 1 month. Path analyses supported two propositions of the TCM as change variables: perceived autonomy support had a significant effect on autonomous motivation in PE and autonomous motivation in PE had a significant effect on autonomous motivation in leisure time. Although we found a direct effect of autonomous motivation in leisure time on physical activity, we did not find support for the third premise of the TCM that autonomous motivation in leisure time indirectly affects physical activity through beliefs and intentions. Current findings did not support the efficacy of the PETALS intervention at changing physical activity behavior and TCM constructs. More research is required to determine whether the TCM predictive validity is supported when other model variables are manipulated through experimental and intervention studies. ISRCTN, ISRCTN39374060 . Registered 19 July 2018. Prospectively registered.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Inadequate physical activity in young people is associated with several physical and mental health concerns. Physical education (PE) is a potentially viable existing network for promoting physical activity in this population. However, little research has been conducted on whether PE teachers can influence students' engagement in leisure-time physical activity. The present study therefore examined the efficacy of an intervention aimed at increasing PE teachers' autonomy support on students' leisure-time physical activity (the PETALS trial). The intervention was guided by the trans-contextual model (TCM) explaining the processes by which PE teachers' provision of autonomy support during PE promotes students' motivation and engagement in physical activity in their leisure time.
METHODS METHODS
The study adopted a cluster-randomized, waitlist control intervention design with randomization by school. Participants were PE teachers (N = 29, 44.83%female; M age = 42.83, SD = 9.53 yrs) and their lower secondary school students (N = 502, 43.82%female; M age = 14.52, SD = 0.71 yrs). We measured TCM constructs, including perceived autonomy support, autonomous motivation in PE and leisure time, beliefs and intentions towards leisure-time physical activity, and physical activity behavior at baseline, post-intervention, and at one-, three-, and six-months. Study hypotheses were tested through a series of ANOVAs and structural equation models using post-intervention and one-month follow-up data.
RESULTS RESULTS
We found no changes in TCM constructs or physical activity behavior in either group at post-intervention or at 1 month. Path analyses supported two propositions of the TCM as change variables: perceived autonomy support had a significant effect on autonomous motivation in PE and autonomous motivation in PE had a significant effect on autonomous motivation in leisure time. Although we found a direct effect of autonomous motivation in leisure time on physical activity, we did not find support for the third premise of the TCM that autonomous motivation in leisure time indirectly affects physical activity through beliefs and intentions.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Current findings did not support the efficacy of the PETALS intervention at changing physical activity behavior and TCM constructs. More research is required to determine whether the TCM predictive validity is supported when other model variables are manipulated through experimental and intervention studies.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ISRCTN, ISRCTN39374060 . Registered 19 July 2018. Prospectively registered.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32962677
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09518-3
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-09518-3
pmc: PMC7510083
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1438

Subventions

Organisme : Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture
ID : OKM/62/626/2016
Organisme : Business Finland
ID : 1801/31/2105

Références

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Mar 21;14(1):37
pubmed: 28327174
Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(3):296-302
pubmed: 25189762
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Jun;59(6):443-9
pubmed: 15911637
Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Jan;89(1):90-6
pubmed: 19056570
Rev Educ Res. 2016 Jun;86(2):360-407
pubmed: 27274585
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Nov;57(5):749-61
pubmed: 2810024
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Sep;213:85-94
pubmed: 30064092
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jul;232:389-397
pubmed: 31146148
Front Public Health. 2019 Mar 19;7:55
pubmed: 30941342
Public Health Nutr. 2003 May;6(3):299-305
pubmed: 12740079
BMC Public Health. 2019 Mar 6;19(1):271
pubmed: 30841921
Prev Med. 2013 May;56(5):245-53
pubmed: 23370047
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Oct 8;13(1):108
pubmed: 27717387
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Apr 25;16(1):36
pubmed: 31023328
Br J Soc Psychol. 2004 Dec;43(Pt 4):551-83
pubmed: 15601509
Br J Health Psychol. 2011 Feb;16(Pt 1):113-34
pubmed: 21226787
Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Feb;15(Pt 1):79-95
pubmed: 19321038
Psychol Health. 2009 Jan;24(1):29-48
pubmed: 20186638
J Phys Act Health. 2020 Apr 14;17(5):557-565
pubmed: 32294621
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(5):955-62
pubmed: 24121247
Health Psychol Rev. 2017 Mar;11(1):1-16
pubmed: 27189713
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 6;19(1):157
pubmed: 30727989
J Phys Act Health. 2018 Nov 1;15(S2):S251-S273
pubmed: 30475137
Annu Rev Psychol. 2017 Jan 3;68:573-600
pubmed: 27618942
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2012 Jun;34(3):365-96
pubmed: 22691399
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Aug;24(4):e306-19
pubmed: 24256054
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Sep;32(9):1598-600
pubmed: 10994911
Prev Med Rep. 2015 Nov 22;3:7-13
pubmed: 26844179
Health Psychol Rev. 2020 Mar;14(1):199-212
pubmed: 31964227
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95
pubmed: 12900694
Health Psychol. 2013 May;32(5):460-73
pubmed: 22888816
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Jun;41(6 Suppl 3):S240-65
pubmed: 27306432
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2011 Apr;33(2):273-88
pubmed: 21558584
Health Psychol Rev. 2016 Dec;10(4):375-380
pubmed: 27718880
BMC Public Health. 2016 May 27;16:451
pubmed: 27229682
J Sport Health Sci. 2019 Sep;8(5):412-421
pubmed: 31534816
Psychol Health. 2020 Jul 1;:1-27
pubmed: 32608265
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Jan;4(1):23-35
pubmed: 31761562
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2010 Dec;81(4):442-55
pubmed: 21268468
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Jun 22;9:78
pubmed: 22726453

Auteurs

Jekaterina Schneider (J)

Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Keskussairaalantie 4, 40600, Jyväskylä, Finland. schneiderjekaterina@gmail.com.

Juho Polet (J)

Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Keskussairaalantie 4, 40600, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Mary Hassandra (M)

Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Thessaly, Thessaly, Greece.

Taru Lintunen (T)

Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Keskussairaalantie 4, 40600, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Arto Laukkanen (A)

Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Keskussairaalantie 4, 40600, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Nelli Hankonen (N)

Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Mirja Hirvensalo (M)

Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Keskussairaalantie 4, 40600, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Tuija H Tammelin (TH)

LIKES Research Centre for Physical Activity and Health, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Timo Törmäkangas (T)

Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Keskussairaalantie 4, 40600, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Martin S Hagger (MS)

Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Keskussairaalantie 4, 40600, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Psychological Sciences, University of California, Merced, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH