Palatal Soft Tissue Thickness on Maxillary Posterior Teeth and Its Relation to Palatal Vault Angle Measured by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Journal
International journal of dentistry
ISSN: 1687-8728
Titre abrégé: Int J Dent
Pays: Egypt
ID NLM: 101524183
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
13
04
2020
revised:
15
08
2020
accepted:
01
09
2020
entrez:
23
9
2020
pubmed:
24
9
2020
medline:
24
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Analyzing palatal soft tissue thickness in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and evaluating the relationship between tissue thickness and palatal vault angulation. Out of 1,737 CBCT images, fifty-six images met the inclusion criteria and were included in this cross-sectional study. The palatal vault angle on the maxillary first molar was measured and divided the images into 3 groups. The soft tissue thickness between the maxillary first premolar and second molar was measured at a distance of 3, 6, 7, 8, and 9 mm from the cementoenamel junction. All the image measurements were performed using CBCT-viewer software. In this study, 56 CBCT images with full permanent maxillary posterior teeth and absence of light scattering were found. The mean age of the patients was 31.59 ± 13.92 years. The moderate and deep palatal vault angle patterns had the greatest and least prevalence, respectively. The average thickness on shallow, moderate, and deep palatal vault groups was 4.02 ± 0.58, 3.75 ± 0.73, and 3.43 ± 0.38 mm, respectively. Furthermore, the mean palatal mucosal thickness was statistically different between the deep and shallow palatal vault angle groups ( A negative correlation between the palatal mucosal thickness and palatal vault angle was observed. Furthermore, this study suggested that the shape of the palatal vault can be one of the supporting data for evaluating the graft dimensions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32963535
doi: 10.1155/2020/8844236
pmc: PMC7499313
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
8844236Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Doosadee Hormdee et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Références
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 May 01;14(3):536-43
pubmed: 24172003
Int J Dent. 2019 Jan 28;2019:1687345
pubmed: 30809259
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Aug;130(2):177-82
pubmed: 16905061
J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41 Suppl 15:S123-42
pubmed: 24640997
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014 Jan-Feb;26(1):48-58
pubmed: 24548316
Imaging Sci Dent. 2015 Mar;45(1):41-7
pubmed: 25793182
Int J Dent. 2017;2017:3268064
pubmed: 28951740
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008;20(6):366-73; discussion 374
pubmed: 19120781
J Clin Periodontol. 1996 Sep;23(9):839-45
pubmed: 8891935
J Periodontol. 1985 Dec;56(12):715-20
pubmed: 3866056
J Clin Periodontol. 2015 May;42(5):458-61
pubmed: 25817728
Periodontol 2000. 1995 Oct;9:90-105
pubmed: 9567980
J Periodontol. 2001 Oct;72(10):1407-12
pubmed: 11699483
J Periodontol. 2006 May;77(5):899-902
pubmed: 16671884
Surg Radiol Anat. 2009 Apr;31(4):245-50
pubmed: 19015806
J Periodontol. 2008 Mar;79(3):406-12
pubmed: 18315422
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1996 Apr;16(2):130-7
pubmed: 9084301
J Prosthet Dent. 1980 Oct;44(4):363-7
pubmed: 6931898