Incisor root length in individuals with and without anterior open bite: a comparative CBCT study.
Journal
Dental press journal of orthodontics
ISSN: 2177-6709
Titre abrégé: Dental Press J Orthod
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 101532240
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
06
03
2019
accepted:
12
06
2019
entrez:
23
9
2020
pubmed:
24
9
2020
medline:
26
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to compare the root length of maxillary and mandibular incisors between individuals with open bite versus matched individuals with adequate overbite. This comparative, matched and retrospective study included 48 cone beam computed tomographies (CBCTs) obtained at a university radiological center. Scans belonged to 24 individuals with open bite (overbite ≤ 0 mm) and 24 individuals with adequate overbite (controls). Both groups were matched by age, sex, malocclusion classification and skeletal characteristics (ANB and FMA angles). Root length of each maxillary and mandibular incisor was measured in millimeters (mm) in a sagittal section from a perpendicular line to the enamel cement junction until the root apex (384 length measurements were made). The means of root length in both groups were compared using t-tests. In addition, correlations between variables were evaluated with the Pearson correlation coefficient (α = 0.05). In both groups, the root length of the upper central incisors was approximately 12 mm and the root length of the maxillary lateral incisors was approximately 13 mm (p˃ 0.05). Likewise, the root length of lower central incisors in both groups measured approximately 12 mm (p˃ 0.05). However, the mandibular lateral incisor roots of open bite patients were significantly longer than in the normal overbite patients (approximately 1 mm, p= 0.012 right side, p= 0.001 left side). Root length of maxillary incisors and central mandibular incisor is similar in individuals with or without open bite, but the mandibular lateral incisor roots in open bite patients were significantly longer than in the normal overbite patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32965383
pii: S2176-94512020000400101
doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.25.4.23.e1-7.onl
pmc: PMC7510492
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
23e1-23e7Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2015 Sep 30;12:14
pubmed: 26425136
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992 Feb;101(2):112-9
pubmed: 1739065
Angle Orthod. 2015 Jan;85(1):72-9
pubmed: 24708039
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Jan;115(1):29-38
pubmed: 9878955
Int Orthod. 2016 Mar;14(1):48-64
pubmed: 26826965
Imaging Sci Dent. 2017 Dec;47(4):241-246
pubmed: 29279823
Acta Odontol Scand. 2009;67(5):265-70
pubmed: 19513885
Angle Orthod. 2013 Jan;83(1):36-42
pubmed: 22897705
Pediatr Dent. 1997 Mar-Apr;19(2):91-8
pubmed: 9106869
Angle Orthod. 2017 Nov;87(6):911-923
pubmed: 28895751
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Aug;132(2):143.e15-22
pubmed: 17693358
Indian J Dent Res. 2016 Jul-Aug;27(4):370-377
pubmed: 27723632
Angle Orthod. 2011 Jul;81(4):564-9
pubmed: 21306229
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Mar;145(3):325-32
pubmed: 24582024
Eur J Orthod. 2013 Dec;35(6):790-5
pubmed: 23307804
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Aug;116(2):238-57
pubmed: 23849378
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Apr;113(4):443-52
pubmed: 9563361
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Apr;139(4 Suppl):S60-8
pubmed: 21435540