Adhesion of flat-ended pillars with non-circular contacts.


Journal

Soft matter
ISSN: 1744-6848
Titre abrégé: Soft Matter
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101295070

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Oct 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 24 9 2020
medline: 24 9 2020
entrez: 23 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Fibrillar adhesives composed of fibers with non-circular cross-sections and contacts, including squares and rectangles, offer advantages that include a larger real contact area when arranged in arrays and simplicity in fabrication. However, they typically have a lower adhesion strength compared to circular pillars due to a stress concentration at the corner of the non-circular contact. We investigate the adhesion of composite pillars with circular, square and rectangular cross-sections each consisting of a stiff pillar terminated by a thin compliant layer at the tip. Finite element mechanics modeling is used to assess differences in the stress distribution at the interface for the different geometries and the adhesion strength of different shape pillars is measured in experiments. The composite fibrillar structure results in a favorable stress distribution on the adhered interface that shifts the crack initiation site away from the edge for all of the cross-sectional contact shapes studied. The highest adhesion strength achieved among the square and rectangular composite pillars with various tip layer thicknesses is approximately 65 kPa. This is comparable to the highest strength measured for circular composite pillars and is about 6.5× higher than the adhesion strength of a homogenous square or rectangular pillar. The results suggest that a composite fibrillar adhesive structure with a local stress concentration at a corner can achieve comparable adhesion strength to a fibrillar structure without such local stress concentrations if the magnitude of the corner stress concentrations are sufficiently small such that failure does not initiate near the corners, and the magnitude of the peak interface stress away from the edge and the tip layer thickness are comparable.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32966531
doi: 10.1039/d0sm01105c
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

9534-9542

Auteurs

Aoyi Luo (A)

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, 220 South 33rd Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. kturner@seas.upenn.edu.

Amir Mohammadi Nasab (A)

Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA.

Milad Tatari (M)

Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA.

Shuai Chen (S)

Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA. washan@syr.edu.

Wanliang Shan (W)

Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA. washan@syr.edu.

Kevin T Turner (KT)

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, 220 South 33rd Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. kturner@seas.upenn.edu.

Classifications MeSH