Clinical Course of Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema Treated with Nepafenac.
cataract surgery
consensus criteria
intravitreal injection
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug
pseudophakic cystoid macular edema
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Sep 2020
21 Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
09
08
2020
revised:
05
09
2020
accepted:
14
09
2020
entrez:
24
9
2020
pubmed:
25
9
2020
medline:
25
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate the clinical course of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME) treated with topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). An analysis of the clinical course of PCME consisting of 536 eyes of 536 patients from five consecutive randomized clinical trials aimed at the optimization of anti-inflammatory medication in patients undergoing routine cataract surgery. PCME was classified as (i) grade 0a; no macular thickening, (ii) grade 0b; macular thickening (central subfield macular thickness (CSMT) increase of at least 10%) without signs of macular edema, (iii) grade I; subclinical PCME, (iv) grade II; acute PCME, (v) grade III; long-standing PCME. Eyes with PCME classification from grade I onwards were treated with nepafenac 1 mg/mL t.i.d. for two months. CSMT increase of at least 10% at any postoperative timepoint with cystoid changes-a criterion for PCME-was found in 19 of 536 eyes (total incidence 3.5%). Of these 19 eyes, 13 eyes (total incidence 2.4%) had clinically significant PCME. PCME was considered clinically significant when both of the following visual acuity criteria were fulfilled. At any timepoint after the cataract surgery both the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) gain was less than 0.4 decimals from that of preoperative CDVA, and the absolute CDVA level remained below 0.8 decimals. Only one of the 19 eyes with criteria for PCME (total incidence 0.2%, incidence of PCME eyes 5.3%) showed no macular edema resolution within 2 months after topical nepafenac administration.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To evaluate the clinical course of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME) treated with topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
METHODS
METHODS
An analysis of the clinical course of PCME consisting of 536 eyes of 536 patients from five consecutive randomized clinical trials aimed at the optimization of anti-inflammatory medication in patients undergoing routine cataract surgery. PCME was classified as (i) grade 0a; no macular thickening, (ii) grade 0b; macular thickening (central subfield macular thickness (CSMT) increase of at least 10%) without signs of macular edema, (iii) grade I; subclinical PCME, (iv) grade II; acute PCME, (v) grade III; long-standing PCME. Eyes with PCME classification from grade I onwards were treated with nepafenac 1 mg/mL t.i.d. for two months.
RESULTS
RESULTS
CSMT increase of at least 10% at any postoperative timepoint with cystoid changes-a criterion for PCME-was found in 19 of 536 eyes (total incidence 3.5%). Of these 19 eyes, 13 eyes (total incidence 2.4%) had clinically significant PCME. PCME was considered clinically significant when both of the following visual acuity criteria were fulfilled. At any timepoint after the cataract surgery both the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) gain was less than 0.4 decimals from that of preoperative CDVA, and the absolute CDVA level remained below 0.8 decimals. Only one of the 19 eyes with criteria for PCME (total incidence 0.2%, incidence of PCME eyes 5.3%) showed no macular edema resolution within 2 months after topical nepafenac administration.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32967137
pii: jcm9093034
doi: 10.3390/jcm9093034
pmc: PMC7563612
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jan;147(1):11-21.e1
pubmed: 18789796
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Oct;56(11):6724-33
pubmed: 26567783
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul;148(1):128-35.e2
pubmed: 19403110
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr;47(3):346-356
pubmed: 30953417
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Jan;29(1):27-33
pubmed: 12551663
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Mar;35(2):106-115
pubmed: 30614750
Retina. 2007 Feb;27(2):159-64
pubmed: 17290196
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Jul;44(7):836-847
pubmed: 30055692
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 May;256(5):909-917
pubmed: 29564551
Curr Eye Res. 2020 Jul;45(7):814-819
pubmed: 31801388
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Jan;34(1):70-5
pubmed: 18165084
Ophthalmology. 2016 Feb;123(2):316-323
pubmed: 26681390
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Feb 20;17(1):16
pubmed: 28219426
Br J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;97(7):862-5
pubmed: 23613514
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2018 Mar 07;10:203-205
pubmed: 29560479
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Nov;160(5):968-981.e33
pubmed: 26232601
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Mar 20;10(1):127
pubmed: 28320481
Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Feb;135(2):246-9
pubmed: 12566041
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan-Feb;15(1):89-95
pubmed: 15751245
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Nov;43(11):1376-1382
pubmed: 29223225
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;29(1):14-22
pubmed: 25646056
Acta Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;96(5):486-493
pubmed: 29369527
Int Ophthalmol. 2012 Jun;32(3):235-43
pubmed: 22484726
Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb;98(1):36-42
pubmed: 31210019
Curr Eye Res. 2017 Apr;42(4):648-652
pubmed: 27612922
Ophthalmology. 2009 Aug;116(8):1481-7, 1487.e1
pubmed: 19545901
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Jan;245(1):18-23
pubmed: 16865374
Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr 30;6(1):143-8
pubmed: 26034486
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun;33(3):259-266
pubmed: 31179657
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Apr;44(4):429-439
pubmed: 29778106
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep;97(6):589-595
pubmed: 30620140
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;23(1):26-32
pubmed: 22134362
Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):e16-7
pubmed: 25618433
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2014 Sep 18;8:1441-9
pubmed: 25258512
Acta Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;96(8):853-859
pubmed: 30284393
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000 Feb;11(1):65-72
pubmed: 10724830
Surv Ophthalmol. 2004 Sep-Oct;49(5):470-90
pubmed: 15325193
Ophthalmology. 2015 Jun;122(6):e34-5
pubmed: 26008911
Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2020;28(2):315-321
pubmed: 30986123
Retina. 2009 Jan;29(1):33-7
pubmed: 18854783
J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:4625730
pubmed: 29410912