Using volunteered geographic information to assess mobility in the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-city time series analysis of 41 cities in 22 countries from March 2nd to 26th 2020.
Journal
Globalization and health
ISSN: 1744-8603
Titre abrégé: Global Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245734
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 09 2020
23 09 2020
Historique:
received:
21
04
2020
accepted:
13
07
2020
entrez:
24
9
2020
pubmed:
25
9
2020
medline:
29
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Restricting mobility is a central aim for lowering contact rates and preventing COVID-19 transmission. Yet the impact on mobility of different non-pharmaceutical countermeasures in the earlier stages of the pandemic is not well-understood. Trends were evaluated using Citymapper's mobility index covering 2nd to 26th March 2020, expressed as percentages of typical usage periods from 0% as the lowest and 100% as normal. China and India were not covered. Multivariate fixed effects models were used to estimate the association of policies restricting movement on mobility before and after their introduction. Policy restrictions were assessed using the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Stringency Index as well as measures coding the timing and degree of school and workplace closures, transport restrictions, and cancellation of mass gatherings. 41 cities worldwide. Citymapper's mobility index. Mobility declined in all major cities throughout March. Larger declines were seen in European than Asian cities. The COVID-19 Government Response Stringency Index was strongly associated with declines in mobility (r = - 0.75, p < 0.001). After adjusting for time-trends, we observed that implementing non-pharmaceutical countermeasures was associated with a decline of mobility of 10.0% for school closures (95% CI: 4.36 to 15.7%), 15.0% for workplace closures (95% CI: 10.2 to 19.8%), 7.09% for cancelling public events (95% CI: 1.98 to 12.2%), 18.0% for closing public transport (95% CI: 6.74 to 29.2%), 13.3% for restricting internal movements (95% CI: 8.85 to 17.8%) and 5.30% for international travel controls (95% CI: 1.69 to 8.90). In contrast, as expected, there was no association between population mobility changes and fiscal or monetary measures or emergency healthcare investment. Understanding the effect of public policy on mobility in the early stages is crucial to slowing and reducing COVID-19 transmission. By using Citymapper's mobility index, this work provides the first evidence about trends in mobility and the impacts of different policy interventions, suggesting that closure of public transport, workplaces and schools are particularly impactful.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32967691
doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00598-9
pii: 10.1186/s12992-020-00598-9
pmc: PMC7509494
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
85Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : N/a
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Euro Surveill. 2020 Apr;25(13):
pubmed: 32265006
PLoS Curr. 2014 Sep 29;6:
pubmed: 25642369
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e271-e278
pubmed: 32251626
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Nov 11;111(45):15888-93
pubmed: 25349388
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 13;6:19342
pubmed: 26758042
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Jul;5(7):e375-e385
pubmed: 32502389
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Oct 1;29(Supplement_3):3-6
pubmed: 31738440
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Jul;65(7):582-7
pubmed: 19213758
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 28;7(1):489
pubmed: 28352101
J Glob Health. 2020 Jun;10(1):010348
pubmed: 32426117
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 May;4(5):397-404
pubmed: 32272089
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 22;112(38):11887-92
pubmed: 26351662