Conformation of sister chromatids in the replicated human genome.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
04
03
2020
accepted:
30
06
2020
pubmed:
25
9
2020
medline:
12
1
2021
entrez:
24
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The three-dimensional organization of the genome supports regulated gene expression, recombination, DNA repair, and chromosome segregation during mitosis. Chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C)
Identifiants
pubmed: 32968280
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2744-4
pii: 10.1038/s41586-020-2744-4
pmc: PMC7116725
mid: EMS114563
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cell Cycle Proteins
0
Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone
0
Heterochromatin
0
DNA
9007-49-2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
139-144Subventions
Organisme : Austrian Science Fund FWF
ID : P 27947
Pays : Austria
Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 281198
Pays : International
Organisme : Austrian Science Fund FWF
ID : F 8002
Pays : Austria
Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 693949
Pays : International
Organisme : Austrian Science Fund FWF
ID : F 8011
Pays : Austria
Organisme : Austrian Science Fund FWF
ID : P 31691
Pays : Austria
Références
Dekker, J., Rippe, K., Dekker, M. & Kleckner, N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295, 1306–1311 (2002).
pubmed: 11847345
doi: 10.1126/science.1067799
Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289–293 (2009).
pubmed: 19815776
pmcid: 2858594
doi: 10.1126/science.1181369
Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376–380 (2012).
pubmed: 22495300
pmcid: 3356448
doi: 10.1038/nature11082
Nora, E. P. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381–385 (2012).
pubmed: 22495304
pmcid: 3555144
doi: 10.1038/nature11049
Rao, S. S. P. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665–1680 (2014).
pubmed: 25497547
pmcid: 5635824
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021
Nagano, T. et al. Cell-cycle dynamics of chromosomal organization at single-cell resolution. Nature 547, 61–67 (2017).
pubmed: 28682332
pmcid: 5567812
doi: 10.1038/nature23001
Gibcus, J. H. et al. A pathway for mitotic chromosome formation. Science 359, eaao6135 (2018).
pubmed: 29348367
pmcid: 5924687
doi: 10.1126/science.aao6135
Schoenfelder, S. & Fraser, P. Long-range enhancer-promoter contacts in gene expression control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 437–455 (2019).
pubmed: 31086298
doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0128-0
Hustedt, N. & Durocher, D. The control of DNA repair by the cell cycle. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 1–9 (2016).
pubmed: 28008184
doi: 10.1038/ncb3452
Batty, P. & Gerlich, D. W. Mitotic chromosome mechanics: how cells segregate their genome. Trends Cell Biol. 29, 717–726 (2019).
pubmed: 31230958
doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2019.05.007
Schwarzer, W. et al. Two independent modes of chromatin organization revealed by cohesin removal. Nature 551, 51–56 (2017).
pubmed: 29094699
pmcid: 5687303
doi: 10.1038/nature24281
Wutz, G. et al. Topologically associating domains and chromatin loops depend on cohesin and are regulated by CTCF, WAPL, and PDS5 proteins. EMBO J. 36, 3573–3599 (2017).
pubmed: 29217591
pmcid: 5730888
doi: 10.15252/embj.201798004
Rao, S. S. P. et al. Cohesin loss eliminates all loop domains. Cell 171, 305–320.e24 (2017).
pubmed: 28985562
pmcid: 5846482
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.026
Gassler, J. et al. A mechanism of cohesin-dependent loop extrusion organizes zygotic genome architecture. EMBO J. 36, 3600–3618 (2017).
pubmed: 29217590
pmcid: 5730859
doi: 10.15252/embj.201798083
van Ruiten, M. S. & Rowland, B. D. SMC complexes: universal DNA looping machines with distinct regulators. Trends Genet. 34, 477–487 (2018).
pubmed: 29606284
doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2018.03.003
Davidson, I. F. et al. DNA loop extrusion by human cohesin. Science 366, 1338–1345 (2019).
pubmed: 31753851
doi: 10.1126/science.aaz3418
Kim, Y., Shi, Z., Zhang, H., Finkelstein, I. J. & Yu, H. Human cohesin compacts DNA by loop extrusion. Science 366, 1345–1349 (2019).
pubmed: 31780627
pmcid: 7387118
doi: 10.1126/science.aaz4475
Kagey, M. H. et al. Mediator and cohesin connect gene expression and chromatin architecture. Nature 467, 430–435 (2010).
pubmed: 20720539
pmcid: 2953795
doi: 10.1038/nature09380
Franke, M. et al. Formation of new chromatin domains determines pathogenicity of genomic duplications. Nature 538, 265–269 (2016).
pubmed: 27706140
doi: 10.1038/nature19800
Northcott, P. A. et al. Enhancer hijacking activates GFI1 family oncogenes in medulloblastoma. Nature 511, 428–434 (2014).
pubmed: 25043047
pmcid: 4201514
doi: 10.1038/nature13379
Gröschel, S. et al. A single oncogenic enhancer rearrangement causes concomitant EVI1 and GATA2 deregulation in leukemia. Cell 157, 369–381 (2014).
pubmed: 24703711
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.019
Rankin, S., Ayad, N. G. & Kirschner, M. W. Sororin, a substrate of the anaphase-promoting complex, is required for sister chromatid cohesion in vertebrates. Mol. Cell 18, 185–200 (2005).
pubmed: 15837422
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.017
Watrin, E. & Peters, J.-M. Cohesin and DNA damage repair. Exp. Cell Res. 312, 2687–2693 (2006).
pubmed: 16876157
doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.06.024
Sjögren, C. & Nasmyth, K. Sister chromatid cohesion is required for postreplicative double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Biol. 11, 991–995 (2001).
pubmed: 11448778
doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00271-8
Nasmyth, K. & Haering, C. H. Cohesin: its roles and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 43, 525–558 (2009).
pubmed: 19886810
doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134233
Herzog, V. A. et al. Thiol-linked alkylation of RNA to assess expression dynamics. Nat. Methods 14, 1198–1204 (2017).
pubmed: 28945705
pmcid: 5712218
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4435
Riml, C. et al. Osmium-mediated transformation of 4-thiouridine to cytidine as key to study RNA dynamics by sequencing. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn Engl. 56, 13479–13483 (2017).
doi: 10.1002/anie.201707465
Gasser, C. et al. Thioguanosine conversion enables mRNA-lifetime evaluation by RNA sequencing using double metabolic labeling (TUC-seq DUAL). Angew. Chem. Int. Edn Engl. 59, 6881–6886 (2020).
doi: 10.1002/anie.201916272
Vassilev, L. T. et al. Selective small-molecule inhibitor reveals critical mitotic functions of human CDK1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10660–10665 (2006).
pubmed: 16818887
pmcid: 1502288
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600447103
Mumbach, M. R. et al. HiChIP: efficient and sensitive analysis of protein-directed genome architecture. Nat. Methods 13, 919–922 (2016).
pubmed: 27643841
pmcid: 5501173
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3999
Stanyte, R. et al. Dynamics of sister chromatid resolution during cell cycle progression. J. Cell Biol. 217, 1985–2004 (2018).
pubmed: 29695489
pmcid: 5987726
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201801157
An, L. et al. OnTAD: hierarchical domain structure reveals the divergence of activity among TADs and boundaries. Genome Biol. 20, 282 (2019).
pubmed: 31847870
pmcid: 6918570
doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1893-y
Sheffield, N. C. & Bock, C. LOLA: enrichment analysis for genomic region sets and regulatory elements in R and Bioconductor. Bioinformatics 32, 587–589 (2016).
pubmed: 26508757
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv612
Jambhekar, A., Dhall, A. & Shi, Y. Roles and regulation of histone methylation in animal development. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 625–641 (2019).
pubmed: 31267065
pmcid: 6774358
doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0151-1
Erceg, J. et al. The genome-wide multi-layered architecture of chromosome pairing in early Drosophila embryos. Nat. Commun. 10, 4486 (2019).
pubmed: 31582744
pmcid: 6776651
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12211-8
ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57–74 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nature11247
Sandelin, A., Alkema, W., Engström, P., Wasserman, W. W. & Lenhard, B. JASPAR: an open-access database for eukaryotic transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D91–D94 (2004).
pubmed: 14681366
pmcid: 308747
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh012
Ladurner, R. et al. Sororin actively maintains sister chromatid cohesion. EMBO J. 35, 635–653 (2016).
pubmed: 26903600
pmcid: 4801952
doi: 10.15252/embj.201592532
Gerlich, D., Koch, B., Dupeux, F., Peters, J.-M. & Ellenberg, J. Live-cell imaging reveals a stable cohesin-chromatin interaction after but not before DNA replication. Curr. Biol. 16, 1571–1578 (2006).
pubmed: 16890534
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.068
Schmitz, J., Watrin, E., Lénárt, P., Mechtler, K. & Peters, J.-M. Sororin is required for stable binding of cohesin to chromatin and for sister chromatid cohesion in interphase. Curr. Biol. 17, 630–636 (2007).
pubmed: 17349791
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.02.029
Nishimura, K., Fukagawa, T., Takisawa, H., Kakimoto, T. & Kanemaki, M. An auxin-based degron system for the rapid depletion of proteins in nonplant cells. Nat. Methods 6, 917–922 (2009).
pubmed: 19915560
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1401
Oomen, M. E., Hedger, A. K., Watts, J. K. & Dekker, J. Detecting chromatin interactions along and between sister chromatids with SisterC. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.10.986208v1 (2020).
Rhodes, J. D. P. et al. Cohesin disrupts polycomb-dependent chromosome interactions in embryonic stem cells. Cell Rep. 30, 820–835.e10 (2020).
pubmed: 31968256
pmcid: 6988126
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.057
Altmeyer, M. & Lukas, J. To spread or not to spread—chromatin modifications in response to DNA damage. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 23, 156–165 (2013).
pubmed: 23312207
doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2012.11.001
Bantignies, F. et al. Inheritance of Polycomb-dependent chromosomal interactions in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 19, 2406–2420 (2003).
doi: 10.1101/gad.269503
Ran, F. A. et al. Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell 154, 1380–1389 (2013).
pubmed: 23992846
pmcid: 3856256
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.021
Morawska, M. & Ulrich, H. D. An expanded tool kit for the auxin-inducible degron system in budding yeast. Yeast 30, 341–351 (2013).
pubmed: 23836714
doi: 10.1002/yea.2967
Samwer, M. et al. DNA cross-bridging shapes a single nucleus from a set of mitotic chromosomes. Cell 170, 956–972.e23 (2017).
pubmed: 28841419
pmcid: 5638020
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.038
Sommer, C., Hoefler, R., Samwer, M. & Gerlich, D. W. A deep learning and novelty detection framework for rapid phenotyping in high-content screening. Mol. Biol. Cell 28, 3428–3436 (2017).
pubmed: 28954863
pmcid: 5687041
doi: 10.1091/mbc.e17-05-0333
Held, M. et al. CellCognition: time-resolved phenotype annotation in high-throughput live cell imaging. Nat. Methods 7, 747–754 (2010).
pubmed: 20693996
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1486
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
pubmed: 22743772
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019
Lusser, A. et al. Thiouridine-to-cytidine conversion sequencing (TUC-seq) to measure mRNA transcription and degradation rates. Methods Mol. Biol. 2062, 191–211 (2020).
pubmed: 31768978
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9822-7_10
Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).
pubmed: 32015543
pmcid: 7056644
doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
Abdennur, N. & Mirny, L. Cooler: scalable storage for Hi-C data and other genomically-labeled arrays. Bioinformatics 36, 311–316 (2020).
pubmed: 31290943
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz540
Imakaev, M. et al. Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization. Nat. Methods 9, 999–1003 (2012).
pubmed: 22941365
pmcid: 3816492
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2148
Zufferey, M., Tavernari, D., Oricchio, E. & Ciriello, G. Comparison of computational methods for the identification of topologically associating domains. Genome Biol. 19, 217 (2018).
pubmed: 30526631
pmcid: 6288901
doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1596-9
Yang, T. et al. HiCRep: assessing the reproducibility of Hi-C data using a stratum-adjusted correlation coefficient. Genome Res. 27, 1939–1949 (2017).
pubmed: 28855260
pmcid: 5668950
doi: 10.1101/gr.220640.117
Zhong, J. et al. Purification of nanogram-range immunoprecipitated DNA in ChIP-seq application. BMC Genomics 18, 985 (2017).
pubmed: 29268714
pmcid: 5740926
doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4371-5
Sathyan, K. M. et al. An improved auxin-inducible degron system preserves native protein levels and enables rapid and specific protein depletion. Genes Dev. 33, 1441–1455 (2019).
pubmed: 31467088
pmcid: 6771385
doi: 10.1101/gad.328237.119
Yesbolatova, A., Natsume, T., Hayashi, K. I. & Kanemaki, M. T. Generation of conditional auxin-inducible degron (AID) cells and tight control of degron-fused proteins using the degradation inhibitor auxinole. Methods 164-165, 73–80 (2019).
pubmed: 31026591
doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.04.010