Predictors of Neoplasia in Colonic Wall Thickening Detected via Computerized Tomography.
colonic wall thickening
colonoscopy
computerized tomography
neoplasia
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Sep 2020
20 Sep 2020
Historique:
entrez:
24
9
2020
pubmed:
25
9
2020
medline:
25
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Introduction Colonic wall thickening (CWT) is frequently observed incidentally via abdominal computerized tomography (aCT). Although the general approach to evaluating incidental CWT is a colonoscopic examination, there is a lack of definitive recommendation guidelines. Thus, we aimed to determine neoplasia rates and identify the factors predictive of neoplasia via colonoscopic examinations of patients with CWT incidentally diagnosed via aCT. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 5,300 colonoscopy reports. A total of 122 patients who had CWT incidentally observed via aCT were included in the study. CWT was graded as mild (3-5 mm), moderate (6-12 mm), or severe (≥12 mm). A logistic regression model was used to determine the predictive factors for neoplasia. Results The mean age of the patients was 60 years, and abnormal findings were noted in 52% of the colonoscopies. Neoplastic lesions were detected in 24 patients (19.6%), while colon adenocarcinoma was detected in 8 patients (6.5%). Multivariate analysis showed that moderate-severe, focal, and asymmetric CWT were independent factors for predicting neoplasia (p=0.049, p=0.033, and p=0.018, respectively). Conclusion Pathological findings can be noted via colonoscopic examination in cases of incidental CWT; therefore, patients with moderate-severe, focal, or asymmetric CWT require colonoscopic examination for the purpose of detecting neoplasia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32968607
doi: 10.7759/cureus.10553
pmc: PMC7505674
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e10553Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020, Karacin et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Natl Med Assoc. 2009 Apr;101(4):345-8
pubmed: 19397225
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2014 Feb;65(1):67-70
pubmed: 23142403
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2008 Mar;37(1):129-60, vii-viii
pubmed: 18313544
Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2586-91
pubmed: 21359889
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019 Dec 22;2019:2492097
pubmed: 31933628
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012 Jan;94(1):23-7
pubmed: 22524916
Surg Endosc. 2009 Oct;23(10):2191-6
pubmed: 19118429
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Nov;8(11):RC09-12
pubmed: 25584284
Am Surg. 2006 Mar;72(3):269-71
pubmed: 16553131
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 May;176(5):1105-16
pubmed: 11312162
J Assoc Physicians India. 2019 Apr;67(4):18-21
pubmed: 31299832
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Jul;167(1):3-15
pubmed: 8659415
Br J Cancer. 2009 Dec 3;101 Suppl 2:S102-9
pubmed: 19956153
Insights Imaging. 2014 Apr;5(2):195-208
pubmed: 24407923
Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Nov;91(11):2305-9
pubmed: 8931407
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Aug;98(8):1734-7
pubmed: 12907326
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct;9(4):278-284
pubmed: 30245790