Dementia as Fixed or Malleable: Development and Validation of the Dementia Mindset Scale.

Care professionals Formal caregiving Nursing homes Person-centered care Well-being

Journal

Innovation in aging
ISSN: 2399-5300
Titre abrégé: Innov Aging
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101703706

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 19 01 2020
entrez: 24 9 2020
pubmed: 25 9 2020
medline: 25 9 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Care professionals differ in how they experience and respond to dementia caregiving. To explain such differences, we developed a new measure: the Dementia Mindset Scale. This scale captures the extent to which care professionals view dementia as stable and fixed (akin to the biomedical perspective) or as flexible and malleable (akin to the person-centered approach). We conducted four studies to develop the scale. We tested items for comprehensibility, assessed the scale's factorial structure and psychometric properties, and investigated its predictive validity for care professionals' well-being. A new scale with a two-factor structure-distinguishing a malleable dementia mindset from a fixed dementia mindset-was developed. Results showed good convergent and divergent validity. Moreover, the dementia mindsets predicted aspects of job-related well-being in care professionals. The scale allows for the assessment of individual differences in how care professionals see dementia. This insight can be used to improve interventions aimed at enhancing care professionals' well-being and quality of care.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
Care professionals differ in how they experience and respond to dementia caregiving. To explain such differences, we developed a new measure: the Dementia Mindset Scale. This scale captures the extent to which care professionals view dementia as stable and fixed (akin to the biomedical perspective) or as flexible and malleable (akin to the person-centered approach).
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS METHODS
We conducted four studies to develop the scale. We tested items for comprehensibility, assessed the scale's factorial structure and psychometric properties, and investigated its predictive validity for care professionals' well-being.
RESULTS RESULTS
A new scale with a two-factor structure-distinguishing a malleable dementia mindset from a fixed dementia mindset-was developed. Results showed good convergent and divergent validity. Moreover, the dementia mindsets predicted aspects of job-related well-being in care professionals.
DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS CONCLUSIONS
The scale allows for the assessment of individual differences in how care professionals see dementia. This insight can be used to improve interventions aimed at enhancing care professionals' well-being and quality of care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32968698
doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaa023
pii: igaa023
pmc: PMC7494239
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

igaa023

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America.

Références

Gerontologist. 2018 Sep 14;58(5):e325-e337
pubmed: 28329827
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Oct;24(19-20):2835-48
pubmed: 26178012
Psychol Bull. 2001 May;127(3):376-407
pubmed: 11393302
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Jan;61(1):100-106
pubmed: 18034813
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Apr;92(4):731-44
pubmed: 17469955
Psychol Aging. 2013 Dec;28(4):948-57
pubmed: 24128076
Gerontologist. 1989 Oct;29(5):597-605
pubmed: 2689293
Gerontologist. 1995 Dec;35(6):771-91
pubmed: 8557205
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):893
pubmed: 28586807
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76
pubmed: 26828106
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Aug;147(8):1170-1190
pubmed: 29620380
Child Dev. 2017 Nov;88(6):1849-1859
pubmed: 28905371
Gerontologist. 2018 Mar 19;58(2):e35-e45
pubmed: 28402533
J Nurs Manag. 2009 Apr;17(3):312-30
pubmed: 19426368
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Nov;65(11):2376-85
pubmed: 19737323
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Jul;24(7):1153-62
pubmed: 22340666
Dementia (London). 2019 Mar 25;:1471301219837776
pubmed: 30909718
Psychol Sci. 2018 Apr;29(4):549-571
pubmed: 29505339
Behav Ther. 2019 Jul;50(4):710-717
pubmed: 31208681
J Educ Psychol. 2016 Apr;108(3):374-391
pubmed: 27524832
J Occup Health Psychol. 2000 Apr;5(2):219-30
pubmed: 10784286
J Aging Stud. 2013 Aug;27(3):276-87
pubmed: 23849425
J Psychol. 2019;153(8):843-859
pubmed: 31314699
J Adv Nurs. 2013 Dec;69(12):2786-99
pubmed: 23651183

Auteurs

Lena K Kunz (LK)

Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.

Susanne Scheibe (S)

Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.

Barbara Wisse (B)

Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Management and Marketing, Durham University, UK.

Kathrin Boerner (K)

Department of Gerontology, McCormack Graduate School, University of Massachusetts Boston.

Claudia Zemlin (C)

Faculty of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, Germany.
Dementia Care Unit, Vitanas GmbH & Co. KGaA, Berlin, Germany.

Classifications MeSH