Acceptability of a trial of vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth among HIV-infected women in Lusaka, Zambia: A mixed methods study.
Administration, Intravaginal
Adult
Female
HIV Infections
/ complications
Humans
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
/ statistics & numerical data
Patient Preference
Premature Birth
/ prevention & control
Progesterone
/ administration & dosage
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
/ psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Zambia
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
30
06
2020
accepted:
21
08
2020
entrez:
24
9
2020
pubmed:
25
9
2020
medline:
3
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Antenatal progesterone prevents preterm birth (PTB) in women with a short cervix or prior PTB in daily vaginal or weekly injectable formulations, respectively. Neither has been tested for the indication of maternal HIV, which is associated with an elevated risk of PTB. The Vaginal Progesterone (VP) Trial was a pilot feasibility study of VP to prevent HIV-related PTB in Lusaka, Zambia. Using mixed methods, we concurrently evaluated the acceptability of the trial and the study product among participants. Over a 1-year period, we enrolled 140 pregnant women living with HIV into a double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of daily self-administered VP or placebo. We administered an endline questionnaire to all participants and conducted in-depth interviews with 30 participants to assess barriers and facilitators to uptake and retention in the trial and to study product adherence. All interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, translated into English as needed, and independently coded by two analysts to capture emerging themes. Of 131 participants who completed the questionnaire, 128 (98%) reported that nothing was difficult when asked the hardest part about using the study product. When given a hypothetical choice between vaginal and injectable progesterone, 97 (74%) chose vaginal, 31 (24%) injectable, and 3 (2%) stated no preference. Most interviewees reported no difficulties with using the study product; others cited minor side effects and surmountable challenges. Strategies that supported adherence included setting alarms, aligning dosing with antiretrovirals, receiving encouragement from friends and family, sensing a benefit to their unborn baby, and positive feedback from study staff. Participants who reported preference of a vaginal medication over injectable described familiarity with the vaginal product, a fear of needles and resulting pain, and inconvenience of a weekly clinic visit. Those who would prefer weekly injections cited fewer doses to remember. Perceived barriers to study participation included mistrust about the motivations behind research, suspicion of Satanism, and futility or possible harm from a placebo. We report key influences on acceptability of a randomized trial of VP to prevent PTB among HIV-infected women in Zambia, which should inform methods to promote uptake, adherence, and retention in a full-scale trial.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32970697
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238748
pii: PONE-D-20-20187
pmc: PMC7514015
doi:
Substances chimiques
Progesterone
4G7DS2Q64Y
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0238748Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : P30 AI050410
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Qual Res. 2012 Apr 1;12(2):165-185
pubmed: 26294895
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016 Apr 1;71(4):452-61
pubmed: 26536315
Lancet HIV. 2016 Jan;3(1):e33-48
pubmed: 26762992
AIDS. 2015 Oct 23;29(16):2161-71
pubmed: 26544581
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 31;(7):CD004947
pubmed: 23903965
Sex Transm Dis. 2013 Dec;40(12):950-6
pubmed: 24220357
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 29;15(1):e0224874
pubmed: 31995557
AIDS. 2012 Oct 23;26(16):2039-52
pubmed: 22951634
Reprod Health Matters. 2000 May;8(15):77-86
pubmed: 11424271
N Engl J Med. 1997 Sep 18;337(12):853-6
pubmed: 9295246
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 5;372(6):509-18
pubmed: 25651245
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 21;9(2):e89118
pubmed: 24586534
BMC Public Health. 2011 Oct 10;11:778
pubmed: 21985332
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jan;7(1):e37-e46
pubmed: 30389451
AIDS Care. 2015;27(4):436-50
pubmed: 25636060
J Int AIDS Soc. 2016 May 30;19(1):20875
pubmed: 27247202
AIDS Behav. 2018 May;22(5):1652-1661
pubmed: 28975510
Int J Womens Health. 2017 Nov 16;9:827-833
pubmed: 29180906
AIDS Behav. 2006 Sep;10(5):483-93
pubmed: 16721505
AIDS Behav. 2014 May;18(5):841-8
pubmed: 24633717
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 25;9(9):e108305
pubmed: 25254378
Lancet Infect Dis. 2011 Dec;11(12):942-51
pubmed: 22030332
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Apr;98(4):218-27
pubmed: 15049460
J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic). 2008 Nov-Dec;7(6):317-23
pubmed: 19056866