Implicit race attitudes modulate visual information extraction for trustworthiness judgments.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
11
07
2019
accepted:
03
09
2020
entrez:
24
9
2020
pubmed:
25
9
2020
medline:
5
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Black people are still considered to be one of the most stigmatized groups and have to face multiple prejudices that undermine their well-being. Assumptions and beliefs about other racial groups are quite pervasive and have been shown to impact basic social tasks such as face processing. For example, individuals with high racial prejudice conceptualize other-race faces as less trustworthy and more criminal. However, it is unknown if implicit racial bias could modulate even low-level perceptual mechanisms such as spatial frequency (SF) extraction when judging the level of trustworthiness of other-race faces. The present study showed that although similar facial features are used to judge the trustworthiness of White and Black faces, own-race faces are processed in lower SF (i.e. coarse information such as the contour of the face and blurred shapes as opposed to high SF representing fine-grained information such as eyelashes or fine wrinkles). This pattern was modulated by implicit race biases: higher implicit biases are associated with a significantly higher reliance on low SF with White than with Black faces.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32970725
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239305
pii: PONE-D-19-19616
pmc: PMC7514083
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0239305Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:519-45
pubmed: 25196277
Psychol Sci. 2004 Oct;15(10):674-9
pubmed: 15447638
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2017 Nov;73:111-124
pubmed: 29910510
Perception. 2009;38(11):1688-99
pubmed: 20120266
Emotion. 2013 Aug;13(4):724-38
pubmed: 23627724
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Feb;98(2):175-89
pubmed: 20085393
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Aug;72(6):1444-9
pubmed: 20675791
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
pubmed: 9176953
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Nov;45(11):1429-1435
pubmed: 31343247
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):197-216
pubmed: 12916565
Psychol Sci. 2017 Aug;28(8):1125-1136
pubmed: 28622095
Psychol Sci. 2015 Aug;26(8):1325-31
pubmed: 26162847
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Apr;106(4):526-45
pubmed: 24564373
Perception. 2005;34(1):77-86
pubmed: 15773608
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Dec;34(6):1327-36
pubmed: 19045978
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 29;8(1):1816
pubmed: 29379032
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Nov;81(5):922-34
pubmed: 11708567
Cognition. 2018 Dec;181:12-20
pubmed: 30103033
Vision Res. 2001 Aug;41(17):2261-71
pubmed: 11448718
Psychol Bull. 1986 Jul;100(1):3-18
pubmed: 3526376
Emotion. 2009 Feb;9(1):39-49
pubmed: 19186915
Brain Res. 2008 Feb 15;1194:100-9
pubmed: 18190897
Perception. 2010;39(4):514-32
pubmed: 20514999
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Feb;43(2):294-306
pubmed: 27819456
Psychol Sci. 2003 Nov;14(6):640-3
pubmed: 14629699
Emotion. 2006 May;6(2):269-78
pubmed: 16768559
PLoS One. 2009 May 20;4(5):e5625
pubmed: 19462006
J Vis. 2014 Jul 22;14(8):17
pubmed: 25052697
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Aug;32(4):1023-39
pubmed: 16846295
Psychol Sci. 2005 Mar;16(3):184-9
pubmed: 15733197
J Vis. 2017 Dec 1;17(14):7
pubmed: 29228140
Percept Psychophys. 1983 Feb;33(2):113-20
pubmed: 6844102
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Mar;1124:208-24
pubmed: 18400932
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jun;74(6):1464-80
pubmed: 9654756
PLoS One. 2008 Aug 20;3(8):e3022
pubmed: 18714387
Annu Rev Sociol. 2008 Jan 1;34:181-209
pubmed: 20689680
Psychol Rev. 2001 Apr;108(2):291-310
pubmed: 11381831
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Oct;41(5):1179-83
pubmed: 26168140
Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:399-423
pubmed: 23808915
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Feb;145(2):131-46
pubmed: 27045281
Psychol Sci. 2019 Feb;30(2):300-308
pubmed: 30452304
Psychol Sci. 2008 Oct;19(10):978-80
pubmed: 19000205
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Sep;8(3):454-69
pubmed: 11700896
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Sep;19(9):1508-19
pubmed: 17714012
Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):796-803
pubmed: 18721917
Front Psychol. 2014 Mar 06;5:139
pubmed: 24639658
Br J Psychol. 2015 May;106(2):186-208
pubmed: 25168952
Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Jun;22(3):341-65; discussion 366-423
pubmed: 11301517
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
pubmed: 9176952
Psychol Sci. 2005 Feb;16(2):123-9
pubmed: 15686578
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 12;105(32):11087-92
pubmed: 18685089
Psychol Sci. 2006 Jul;17(7):592-8
pubmed: 16866745
Front Psychol. 2013 Feb 25;4:74
pubmed: 23444233
Br J Psychol. 2011 Nov;102(4):959-74
pubmed: 21988395
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 May;78(5):837-52
pubmed: 10821193
J Vis. 2005 Oct 05;5(9):659-67
pubmed: 16356076
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e34293
pubmed: 22470553
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 10;108(19):7710-5
pubmed: 21518877