Development and evaluation of stem cell collection procedure diagrams to support the education and recruitment of committed stem cell donors.
bone marrow
donation
donor
donor recruitment
informed consent
peripheral blood stem cell
Journal
Vox sanguinis
ISSN: 1423-0410
Titre abrégé: Vox Sang
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0413606
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
05
06
2020
revised:
01
09
2020
accepted:
02
09
2020
pubmed:
25
9
2020
medline:
13
5
2021
entrez:
24
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Diagrams which allow potential unrelated stem cell donors to visualize the stem cell collection process were hypothesized to support the recruitment and education of committed stem cell donors. A series of bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell collection procedure diagrams were developed, featuring young adult male donors of varied ethnic backgrounds. Post-implementation, surveys were conducted to evaluate stakeholder perspective on the diagrams' utility. A quality improvement project was conducted at five stem cell drives from 2017 to 2018 at which recruiters did or did not show the diagrams to potential donors. Following the drives, registrants were invited to complete a survey exploring their experience, knowledge and attitude towards donation. The diagrams were implemented in Canada in 07/2016. Of 293 participating registrants (24·7% non-Caucasian males) recruited at five drives between 2017 and 2018, 76% (n = 197) were shown the diagrams. Participants who were shown the diagrams were significantly more likely to report that the recruiters appeared very knowledgeable (89% vs. 76%, P = 0·019) and to report improved self-reported knowledge of stem cell donation (P = 0·010) compared to participants not shown the diagram. Data are also shown demonstrating that stakeholders in donor recruitment used and valued the diagrams and that use of the diagrams was associated with improved donor recruitment outcomes in Canada. This report is the first evaluation of stem cell collection diagrams in the literature. The diagrams are relevant to donor registries, recruitment organizations and transplant centres worldwide, and their use may support efforts to educate and recruit committed, ethnically diverse donors.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Diagrams which allow potential unrelated stem cell donors to visualize the stem cell collection process were hypothesized to support the recruitment and education of committed stem cell donors.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
METHODS
A series of bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell collection procedure diagrams were developed, featuring young adult male donors of varied ethnic backgrounds. Post-implementation, surveys were conducted to evaluate stakeholder perspective on the diagrams' utility. A quality improvement project was conducted at five stem cell drives from 2017 to 2018 at which recruiters did or did not show the diagrams to potential donors. Following the drives, registrants were invited to complete a survey exploring their experience, knowledge and attitude towards donation.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The diagrams were implemented in Canada in 07/2016. Of 293 participating registrants (24·7% non-Caucasian males) recruited at five drives between 2017 and 2018, 76% (n = 197) were shown the diagrams. Participants who were shown the diagrams were significantly more likely to report that the recruiters appeared very knowledgeable (89% vs. 76%, P = 0·019) and to report improved self-reported knowledge of stem cell donation (P = 0·010) compared to participants not shown the diagram. Data are also shown demonstrating that stakeholders in donor recruitment used and valued the diagrams and that use of the diagrams was associated with improved donor recruitment outcomes in Canada.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This report is the first evaluation of stem cell collection diagrams in the literature. The diagrams are relevant to donor registries, recruitment organizations and transplant centres worldwide, and their use may support efforts to educate and recruit committed, ethnically diverse donors.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
239-248Subventions
Organisme : Doctors of BC
Organisme : Canadian Blood Services
Organisme : Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa
Informations de copyright
© 2020 International Society of Blood Transfusion.
Références
D’Souza A, Fretham C: “Current uses and outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.”, CIBMTR Summary Slides. CIBMTR Summary Slides 2019, p. Available at: http://www.cibmtr.org, 2019.
Greco-stewart V, Elmoazzen H, Morris G, et al.: Improved access to better HLA-matched hematopoietic cells for allogeneic transplant: analysis of donors and cord blood units selected for Canadian patients in 2018. Transfusion 2020; 60:1-11
World Marrow Donor Association. WMDA search & match service statistics. 2020 [retrieved 27 Jul 2020]. https://statistics.wmda.info/.
Heemskerk MBA, van Walraven SM, Cornelissen JJ, et al.: How to improve the search for an unrelated haematopoietic stem cell donor. Faster is better than more! Bone Marrow Transplant 2005; 35:645-652
Dehn J, Buck K, Maiers M, et al.: 8/8 and 10/10 high-resolution match rate for the be thematch unrelated donor registry. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2015; 21:137-141
Allan DS, Takach S, Smith S, et al.: Impact of declining fertility rates in Canada on donor options in blood and marrow transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15:1634-1637
Gragert L, Eapen M, Williams E, et al.: HLA match likelihoods for hematopoietic stem-cell grafts in the U.S. registry. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:339-348
Israeli M, Yeshurun M, Stein J, et al.: Trends and challenges in searching for HLA-matched unrelated donors in Israel. Hum Immunol 2013; 74:942-945
Maiers M, Halagan M, Joshi S, et al.: HLA match likelihoods for Indian patients seeking unrelated donor transplantation grafts: A population-based study. Lancet Haematol. 2014; 1:e57-e63.
van Walraven SM, Brand A, Bakker JNA, et al.: The increase of the global donor inventory is of limited benefit to patients of non-northwestern european descent. Haematologica 2017; 102:176-183
Fingrut W: The Need for Ethnically Diverse Stem Cell Donors. UBCMJ 2015; 7:44-47
Anthias C, Shaw BE, Bruce JG, et al.: Role of race/ethnicity in donor decisions about unrelated hematopoietic progenitor cell donation: exploring reasons for higher attrition among racial/ethnic minorities. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2020; 26:593-599
Kollman C, Weis T, Switzer GE, et al.: Non-HLA barriers to unrelated donor stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001; 27:581-587
Kollman C, Spellman SR, Zhang MJ, et al.: The effect of donor characteristics on survival after unrelated donor transplantation for hematologic malignancy. Blood 2016; 127:260-267
Little AM, Green A, Harvey J, et al.: “BSHI Guideline: HLA matching and donor selection for haematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation”, International. J Immunogenet 2016; 43:263-286.
Fingrut W, Rikhraj K, Allan D: Targeted recruitment of male donors for allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation: A review of the evidence. Vox Sang 2018; 113:307-316
Shaw BE, Logan BR, Spellman SR, et al.: Development of an unrelated donor selection score predictive of survival after HCT: donor age matters most. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2018; 24:1049-1056.
Switzer GE, Myaskovsky L, Goycoolea JM, et al.: Factors associated with ambivalence about bone marrow donation among newly recruited unrelated potential donors. Transplantation 2003; 75:1517-1523.
Switzer GE, Dew MA, Goycoolea JM, et al.: Attrition of potential bone marrow donors at two key decision points leading to donation. Transplantation 2004; 77:1529-34
Switzer GE, Bruce JG, Myaskovsky L, et al.: Race and ethnicity in decisions about unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donation. Blood 2013; 121:1469-1476
Houts PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, et al.: The role of pictures in improving health communication: A review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 61:173-190
Fingrut W, Parmar S, Cuperfain A, et al.: The Stem Cell Club: a model for unrelated stem cell donor recruitment. Transfusion 2017; 57:2928-2936.
World Marrow Donor Association. WMDA Standards 2020. pp. 1-26
Stones C, Gent M: The 7 G.R.A.P.H.I.C principles of public health infographic design, University of Leeds, 2015. 1-44. Retrieved on September 16 2020. https://improvementacademy.org/documents/Projects/air_quality/The%207%20Graphic%20Principals%20of%20Public%20Health%20Infographic%20Design.pdf
Fingrut W, Messner H, Allan D: Targeted recruitment of optimal donors for unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation: The Stem Cell Club process. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther 2020. In Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hemonc.2020.04.001
Quality improvement. Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board. 2014 [retrieved 27 Jul 2020]. https://hireb.ca/guidelines/quality-assurance/.
Switzer GE, Simmons RG, Dew MA: Helping unrelated strangers: Physical and psychological reactions to the bone marrow donation process among anonymous donors. J Appl Soc Psychol 1996;26(6), 469-490.
Rosenmayr A, Hartwell L, Egeland T: Informed Consent - Suggested procedures for informed consent for unrelated haemotopoietic stem cell donors at various stages of recruitment, donor evaluation, and donor workup. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003;31(7), 539-545.
Li E, Lee A, Vaseghi-Shanjani M, et al.: Development and Evaluation of a Whiteboard Video Series to Support the Education and Recruitment of Committed Unrelated Donors for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. BBMT 2020. In Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.07.008
Lown RN, Marsh SGE, Switzer GE, et al.: Ethnicity, length of time on the register and sex predict donor availability at the confirmatory typing stage. Bone Marrow Transplant 2014; 49:525-531