Imaging Outcomes for Axial Spondyloarthritis and Sensitivity to Change: A Five-Year Analysis of the DESIR Cohort.
Journal
Arthritis care & research
ISSN: 2151-4658
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101518086
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2022
02 2022
Historique:
revised:
14
08
2020
received:
09
03
2020
accepted:
15
09
2020
pubmed:
26
9
2020
medline:
15
2
2022
entrez:
25
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the sensitivity to change of different imaging scoring methods in patients with early axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). Patients from the Devenir des Spondylarthropathies Indifferérenciées Récentes (DESIR) cohort fulfilling the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria for axial SpA were included. Radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac (SI) joints and spine were obtained at baseline, 1, 2, and 5 years. Each image was scored by 2 or 3 readers in 3 separate reading waves. The rate of change of outcomes measuring inflammation of the spine and SI joints (e.g., Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] score) and structural damage on MRI (e.g., ≥3 fatty lesions) and radiographs (e.g., modified New York grading) was assessed using multilevel generalized estimating equation models (taking all readers and waves into account). To allow comparisons across outcomes, rates were standardized (difference between the individual's value and the population mean divided by the SD). In total, 345 patients were included. Inflammation detected on MRI of the SI joints (MRI-SI joints) (standardized rate range -0.278, -0.441) was more sensitive to change compared to spinal inflammation (range -0.030, -0.055). Structural damage in the SI joints showed a higher standardized rate of change on MRI-SI joints (range 0.015, 0.274) compared to radiography of the SI joints (range 0.043, 0.126). MRI-SI joints damage defined by ≥3 fatty lesions showed the highest sensitivity to change (0.274). Spinal structural damage slowly progressed over time with no meaningful difference between radiographic (range 0.037, 0.043) and MRI structural outcomes (range 0.008, 0.027). Structural damage assessed in pelvic radiographs has low sensitivity to change, while fatty lesions detected on MRI-SI joints are a promising alternative. In contrast, MRI of the spine is not better than radiography of the spine in detecting structural changes in patients with early axial SpA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32976683
doi: 10.1002/acr.24459
pmc: PMC9303461
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
251-258Subventions
Organisme : Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia
ID : SFRH/BD/108246/2015
Organisme : Pfizer
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Arthritis Care & Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.
Références
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020 Dec;50(6):1394-1399
pubmed: 32209237
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Aug 15;53(4):502-9
pubmed: 16082639
Arthritis Res Ther. 2013 Jan 17;15(1):R14
pubmed: 23327723
Mod Rheumatol. 2014 Jul;24(4):572-9
pubmed: 24320747
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Aug;70(8):1369-74
pubmed: 21622969
Joint Bone Spine. 2011 Dec;78(6):598-603
pubmed: 21458351
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Nov 1;57(11):1991-2000
pubmed: 30053219
J Rheumatol. 2007 Apr;34(4):862-70
pubmed: 17407241
Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Oct;62(10):3048-58
pubmed: 20496416
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jun;72(6):815-22
pubmed: 22772328
RMD Open. 2020 Feb;6(1):
pubmed: 32396521
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Feb;77(2):293-299
pubmed: 29127092
J Rheumatol. 2011 Sep;38(9):2051-4
pubmed: 21885516
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jul;67(7):745-53
pubmed: 24582946
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Nov;76(11):1823-1828
pubmed: 28684556
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jul;74(7):1327-39
pubmed: 25837448
Arthritis Rheum. 1984 Apr;27(4):361-8
pubmed: 6231933
RMD Open. 2018 Mar 16;4(1):e000624
pubmed: 29556419
J Rheumatol. 2005 Oct;32(10):2042-7
pubmed: 16206367
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Aug;71(8):1278-88
pubmed: 22586174
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Oct;68(10):1520-7
pubmed: 19454404
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jul;75(7):1328-35
pubmed: 26269397
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Aug;50(8):2622-32
pubmed: 15334477
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jul;75(7):1308-14
pubmed: 26286018
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Nov;75(11):1958-1963
pubmed: 26768408
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Jan;64(1):127-9
pubmed: 15051621
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Oct 15;53(5):703-9
pubmed: 16208659