Posteromedial Release versus Ponseti Treatment of Congenital Idiopathic Clubfoot: A Long-Term Retrospective Follow-Up Study into Adolescence.
ICFSG score
adductus
calcaneocuboid
flat-top talus
relapse
residual deformities
Journal
Therapeutics and clinical risk management
ISSN: 1176-6336
Titre abrégé: Ther Clin Risk Manag
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101253281
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
27
05
2020
accepted:
11
08
2020
entrez:
28
9
2020
pubmed:
29
9
2020
medline:
29
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although many short-term studies have shown the superiority of Ponseti treatment to surgical treatment, studies with long-term follow-up of patients into adolescence are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the morphological, functional and radiological results of the two methods into and during adolescent age, when both soft tissue and bony procedures can be performed to correct residual deformities. We retrospectively evaluated two groups of patients diagnosed with congenital idiopathic clubfoot and treated with either the Ponseti method (34 clubfeet) and surgery in the form of posteromedial release (31 clubfeet). All included clubfeet were clinically fully corrected after initial treatment and final plaster removal. Evaluation was performed with the International Clubfoot Study Group (ICFSG) score. The age at follow-up was 12.8±1.6 years in the Ponseti group and 13.5±1.7 years in the surgical group. Excellent or good results were obtained in 26 feet (76%) of the Ponseti group and in 14 feet (45%) in the surgical group. The Ponseti treatment was significantly superior to posteromedial release in terms of the final score (10.58±6.49 versus 17.26±8.83, p<0.001), functional score (p<0.001) and radiological score (p<0.001). Residual deformities were clinically present in both groups but were less frequent and less severe in Ponseti-treated patients. Flat-top talus was found to be present in both groups, but the Ponseti method was more protective than surgical treatment against this outcome (relative risk=0.494, p=0.002). The overall foot and ankle mobility was significantly better in the Ponseti group (p<0.001). The Ponseti method was superior to surgery for treatment of clubfoot and achieved better long-term morphological, functional and radiological results. It preserves better mobility of the foot and ankle, and results in less frequent and less severe residual deformities than surgical treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32982254
doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S262199
pii: 262199
pmc: PMC7498928
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
813-819Informations de copyright
© 2020 Corbu et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
This study was funded by the University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila Bucharest, which was not involved in any of the stages from study design to article submission. The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Jan;27(1):29-37
pubmed: 16442026
J Child Orthop. 2012 Mar;6(1):51-9
pubmed: 23449014
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2006 Jan;15(1):34-6
pubmed: 16280717
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jul;85(7):1286-94
pubmed: 12851354
Iowa Orthop J. 2002;22:55-6
pubmed: 12180612
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981 Oct;(160):30-42
pubmed: 7285433
J Child Orthop. 2019 Jun 1;13(3):293-303
pubmed: 31312269
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Oct;77(10):1477-89
pubmed: 7593056
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 May;467(5):1133-45
pubmed: 19219519
J Child Orthop. 2018 Dec 1;12(6):566-574
pubmed: 30607203
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Apr;472(4):1281-90
pubmed: 24249539
J Pediatr Orthop. 2000 Sep-Oct;20(5):648-51
pubmed: 11008747
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Feb;75(2):190-5
pubmed: 8423179
Acta Ortop Bras. 2019 Jan-Feb;27(1):8-11
pubmed: 30774521
J Pediatr Orthop. 2006 Sep-Oct;26(5):664-72
pubmed: 16932109
J Pediatr Orthop B. 1995;4(1):71-3
pubmed: 7719838
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 May;467(5):1124-32
pubmed: 19219518
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016;20(2):220-4
pubmed: 26875888
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2014 Nov;23(6):512-6
pubmed: 25153646
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972 May;84:29-38
pubmed: 5032846
J R Soc Interface. 2018 Aug;15(145):
pubmed: 30111662
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980 Jan;62(1):23-31
pubmed: 7351412
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Jul;82(5):739-43
pubmed: 10963177
J Med Genet. 1965 Dec;2(4):227-32
pubmed: 5859027
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982 Jun;64(5):652-65
pubmed: 7085691
J Child Orthop. 2016 Oct;10(5):445-52
pubmed: 27436118
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 May;467(5):1326-33
pubmed: 19089522
J Pediatr Orthop B. 1995;4(2):129-36
pubmed: 7670979
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2003 Jul;12(4):269-71
pubmed: 12821844
Int Orthop. 2009 Feb;33(1):225-9
pubmed: 17768623
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979 Sep;61(6A):805-14
pubmed: 479227
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2003 Sep-Oct;42(5):259-67
pubmed: 14566717