Metaphor Is Between Metonymy and Homonymy: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials.
N400
P600
ambiguous words
event-related potentials
homonymy
metaphor
metonymy
polysemy
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
28
07
2019
accepted:
29
07
2020
entrez:
28
9
2020
pubmed:
29
9
2020
medline:
29
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The goal of the present study was to investigate the interaction between different senses of polysemous nouns (metonymies and metaphors) and different meanings of homonyms using the method of event-related potentials (ERPs) and a priming paradigm. Participants read two-word phrases containing ambiguous words and made a sensicality judgment. Phrases with polysemes highlighted their literal sense and were preceded by primes with either the same or different - metonymic or metaphorical - sense. Similarly, phrases with homonyms were primed by phrases with a consistent or inconsistent meaning of the noun. The results demonstrated that polysemous phrases with literal senses preceded by metonymic primes did not differ in ERP responses from the control condition with the same literal primes. In contrast, processing phrases with the literal sense preceded by metaphorical primes resulted in N400 and P600 effects that might reflect a very limited priming effect. The priming effect observed between metonymic and literal senses supports the idea that these senses share a single representation in the mental lexicon. In contrast, the effects observed for polysemes with metaphorical primes characterize lexical access to the word's target sense and competition between the two word senses. The processing of homonyms preceded by the prime with an inconsistent meaning, although it did not elicit an N400 effect, was accompanied by a P600 effect as compared to the control condition with a consistent meaning of the prime. We suppose that the absence of the N400 effect may result from inhibition of the target meaning by the inconsistent prime, whereas the P600 response might reflect processes of reanalysis, activation, and integration of the target meaning. Our results provide additional evidence for the difference in processing mechanisms between metonymies and metaphors that might have separate representations in the mental lexicon, although they are more related as compared to homonyms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32982863
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02113
pmc: PMC7490628
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2113Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Yurchenko, Lopukhina and Dragoy.
Références
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Jun;24(1):57-65
pubmed: 15922158
J Psycholinguist Res. 1993 Mar;22(2):251-71
pubmed: 8366477
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Feb;23(2):277-93
pubmed: 20044894
Brain Res. 2012 Mar 29;1446:127-43
pubmed: 22361114
Front Psychol. 2013 Dec 19;4:938
pubmed: 24391608
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:621-47
pubmed: 20809790
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jan;18(1):97-109
pubmed: 16417686
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Feb;68:126-38
pubmed: 25576909
Science. 1980 Jan 11;207(4427):203-5
pubmed: 7350657
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1534-43
pubmed: 18980412
Brain Lang. 2002 Apr-Jun;81(1-3):205-23
pubmed: 12081393
Brain Lang. 2012 Oct;123(1):11-21
pubmed: 22819308
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Aug 04;8:583
pubmed: 25136309
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Jan;10(3):345-8
pubmed: 11167059
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 21;9:192
pubmed: 29515502
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1983 Apr;55(4):468-84
pubmed: 6187540
Brain Lang. 2002 Apr-Jun;81(1-3):666-78
pubmed: 12081430
Front Psychol. 2016 May 03;7:559
pubmed: 27199799