NKX3.1 Identifies Prostatic Origin of Dural Metastasis in the Setting of Negative Prostate-Specific Antigen Stain.
brain biopsy
dural metastasis
immunohistochemical stain
prostate adenocarcinoma
Journal
The Neurohospitalist
ISSN: 1941-8744
Titre abrégé: Neurohospitalist
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101558199
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
entrez:
28
9
2020
pubmed:
29
9
2020
medline:
29
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
No clear guidelines exist for the appropriate diagnostic workup of an intracranial mass suspected to be a metastasis from unknown primary origin. Dural metastasis from prostatic origin is very rare. Patients with a known history of metastatic prostate cancer who present with a newly discovered lesion on brain imaging require neurosurgical biopsy to confirm diagnosis prior to initiating treatment. Intracranial metastasis from prostate cancer is rare, and dural metastasis is rarer than intraparenchymal metastasis. Current consensus guidelines support immunohistochemical staining with classic markers such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to identify prostatic origin. However, PSA detection of prostate metastases declines with higher Gleason scores and in patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy. NKX3.1 is another stain that is highly sensitive and specific for prostate. Our patient was a 54-year-old man with a history of metastatic prostate cancer who presented with new-onset seizures. Brain imaging revealed a dural-based lesion with surrounding vasogenic edema and midline shift. The patient underwent resection of the lesion, which was stained with multiple cancer markers. Prostate-specific antigen was negative, but NKX3.1 was positive indicating a prostatic origin for the mass. He underwent a craniectomy to remove the lesion and was given steroids. However, he succumbed to his illness several months later. Here, we document the first report to our knowledge of a patient with prostate metastasis to the dura that is PSA negative, but NKX3.1 positive.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32983354
doi: 10.1177/1941874420931232
pii: 10.1177_1941874420931232
pmc: PMC7495695
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
314-317Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Am J Clin Pathol. 2002 Mar;117(3):471-7
pubmed: 11888088
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 May 29;18(6):
pubmed: 28555048
Mod Pathol. 2015 Jan;28(1):138-45
pubmed: 24925052
Clin Transl Oncol. 2018 Jan;20(1):89-96
pubmed: 29230692
Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26 Suppl 5:v133-8
pubmed: 26314775
Urology. 1986 Oct;28(4):280-7
pubmed: 3765236
Cancer. 2003 Jul 15;98(2):363-8
pubmed: 12872358
Prostate. 2003 May 1;55(2):111-7
pubmed: 12661036
Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Aug;34(8):1097-105
pubmed: 20588175