Evaluation of a manualised speech and language therapy programme for children with social communication disorder: the SCIP feasibility study.
Intervention
Language therapy
Pragmatics
Social communication
Speech
Trial
Journal
Pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN: 2055-5784
Titre abrégé: Pilot Feasibility Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676536
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
22
03
2019
accepted:
02
08
2020
entrez:
28
9
2020
pubmed:
29
9
2020
medline:
29
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Children with Social (Pragmatic) Communication Disorder (SPCD) have long-term needs in using and processing social language and have a high risk of later mental health difficulties. A manualised speech and language therapy programme, the Social Communication Intervention Programme (SCIP) provides therapy content for SPCD. A feasibility study is required to derive more precise estimates of key parameters for a future trial of SCIP. To assess the feasibility of conducting a substantive randomized controlled trial of SCIP for children with SPCD. A questionnaire was distributed to paediatric speech and language therapists in England. Survey questions addressed number of eligible children, routine intervention provision and trial recruitment factors. In the second phase, a single-arm intervention feasibility study was completed. Fifteen speech and language practitioners identified 24 children aged 5-11 years with SPCD. Practitioners received training/supervision to deliver 20 SCIP therapy sessions to each child. At time 1, parents of participating children provided three communication goals; expected steps in each goal were defined. After intervention, parents and practitioners independently rated each goal compared to baseline ability. Two research practitioners compared parent post-intervention commentaries with outcome scores to derive guidance about clinical significance. All practitioners recorded audio commentaries on therapy experiences. Post-intervention interviews were conducted with 6 practitioners and 6 parents. An expert panel completed a Delphi consultation on trial design. Routine practice for SPCD varies widely. Children tend to be embedded in autism provision. Participation in a future trial was well supported provided resources are available to services. Outcomes analysis indicated all children except one made some progress on parent ratings; all children made progress on practitioner ratings. A power analysis for a future trial was carried out using current outcome measure as putative primary endpoint. Practitioners' audio-diaries provided suggestions for training and adaption in a future trial. Outcomes and therapy methods were acceptable to practitioners and parents. The feasibility study evaluated a novel outcome measure of social communication skills in SPCD. A power calculation indicated a feasible framework for a trial within a realistic period of time. Recommendations for recruitment methods, adaptation of manual and training were supported by practitioners and an expert panel. Title: Speech-language therapy for child social communication disorderTrial ID: ISRCTN48030419. Date registered: January 1, 2017. Registered retrospectively.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Children with Social (Pragmatic) Communication Disorder (SPCD) have long-term needs in using and processing social language and have a high risk of later mental health difficulties. A manualised speech and language therapy programme, the Social Communication Intervention Programme (SCIP) provides therapy content for SPCD. A feasibility study is required to derive more precise estimates of key parameters for a future trial of SCIP.
AIMS
OBJECTIVE
To assess the feasibility of conducting a substantive randomized controlled trial of SCIP for children with SPCD.
METHODS
METHODS
A questionnaire was distributed to paediatric speech and language therapists in England. Survey questions addressed number of eligible children, routine intervention provision and trial recruitment factors. In the second phase, a single-arm intervention feasibility study was completed. Fifteen speech and language practitioners identified 24 children aged 5-11 years with SPCD. Practitioners received training/supervision to deliver 20 SCIP therapy sessions to each child. At time 1, parents of participating children provided three communication goals; expected steps in each goal were defined. After intervention, parents and practitioners independently rated each goal compared to baseline ability. Two research practitioners compared parent post-intervention commentaries with outcome scores to derive guidance about clinical significance. All practitioners recorded audio commentaries on therapy experiences. Post-intervention interviews were conducted with 6 practitioners and 6 parents. An expert panel completed a Delphi consultation on trial design.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Routine practice for SPCD varies widely. Children tend to be embedded in autism provision. Participation in a future trial was well supported provided resources are available to services. Outcomes analysis indicated all children except one made some progress on parent ratings; all children made progress on practitioner ratings. A power analysis for a future trial was carried out using current outcome measure as putative primary endpoint. Practitioners' audio-diaries provided suggestions for training and adaption in a future trial. Outcomes and therapy methods were acceptable to practitioners and parents.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The feasibility study evaluated a novel outcome measure of social communication skills in SPCD. A power calculation indicated a feasible framework for a trial within a realistic period of time. Recommendations for recruitment methods, adaptation of manual and training were supported by practitioners and an expert panel.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Title: Speech-language therapy for child social communication disorderTrial ID: ISRCTN48030419. Date registered: January 1, 2017. Registered retrospectively.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32983554
doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00658-2
pii: 658
pmc: PMC7510260
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
137Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : PB-PG-1014-35011
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsAdams and Gaile are the authors of the SCIP intervention programme and receive royalties from the publishers.
Références
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Nov;34(11):4161-9
pubmed: 24077068
J Commun Disord. 2011 Mar-Apr;44(2):186-99
pubmed: 20970811
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;55(3):204-16
pubmed: 24117874
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2012 Apr;43(2):235-49
pubmed: 22052968
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013 Jan;48(1):41-53
pubmed: 23317383
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;58(10):1166-1175
pubmed: 28741680
JAMA. 2003 Jan 1;289(1):49-55
pubmed: 12503976
Clin Rehabil. 2009 Apr;23(4):362-70
pubmed: 19179355
Lancet. 2006 Jul 15;368(9531):210-5
pubmed: 16844490
J Autism Dev Disord. 2009 Feb;39(2):388-93
pubmed: 18626760
Res Dev Disabil. 2020 Oct;105:103752
pubmed: 32771922
Community Ment Health J. 1968 Dec;4(6):443-53
pubmed: 24185570
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2004 Jul-Sep;39(3):303-24
pubmed: 15204443
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012 May-Jun;47(3):233-44
pubmed: 22512510
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD004110
pubmed: 12918003
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;57(11):1247-1257
pubmed: 27184709