Teriflunomide-exposed pregnancies in a French cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis.
Journal
Neurology. Clinical practice
ISSN: 2163-0402
Titre abrégé: Neurol Clin Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101577149
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
21
03
2019
accepted:
19
07
2019
entrez:
28
9
2020
pubmed:
29
9
2020
medline:
29
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To describe pregnancies exposed to teriflunomide (TERIF) in women with multiple sclerosis (MS) in France over the period 2014-2016. All 15- to 49-year-old women with MS in the national health insurance database were included. Pregnancies that had started between August 2014 and March 2016 were identified from their outcomes. Three groups according to treatment exposure were compared: TERIF, interferons (IFNs) or glatiramer acetate, and no medication. Among the 44,008 women with MS followed 24.5 months on average, 2,639 pregnancies were identified. There were 1,538 pregnancies (58.3%) that were not exposed to any MS treatment in accordance with the guidelines. A total of 673 pregnancies (25.5%) were exposed to IFN and/or glatiramer acetate, and possible or probable exposure to contra-indicated treatments was observed in 428 pregnancies (16.2%), of whom 47 pregnancies were exposed to TERIF. The annual incidence rate of pregnancies exposed to TERIF was 1.4 per 100 patient-years; i.e., 3 times less than the 2 control groups (5.6 and 4.7, respectively). The median exposure duration to TERIF was 45 days after conception. The outcomes comprised 23 live births, 22 abortions (3 times more than the 2 other groups), and 2 miscarriages. All newborns were healthy at birth. Despite specific TERIF guidelines for pregnancy-related issues and the availability of alternative therapies, some pregnancies exposed to TERIF were identified. Most of the cases were because of the absence of the recommended accelerated elimination procedure and appeared to be mostly unplanned pregnancies that probably reflect a lack of effective contraception.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32983608
doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000717
pii: NEURCLINPRACT2019039156
pmc: PMC7508337
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
287-297Informations de copyright
© 2019 American Academy of Neurology.
Références
Nat Rev Neurol. 2015 May;11(5):280-9
pubmed: 25896084
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2014 Nov;43(9):680-90
pubmed: 24135017
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Mar;13(3):247-56
pubmed: 24461574
CNS Drugs. 2018 Feb;32(2):161-178
pubmed: 29508244
BMC Neurol. 2012 Oct 22;12:124
pubmed: 23088447
J Neurol. 2017 Jun;264(6):1185-1192
pubmed: 28516332
N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 6;365(14):1293-303
pubmed: 21991951
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):763-770
pubmed: 29763992
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2017 Oct;65 Suppl 4:S149-S167
pubmed: 28756037
Eur J Neurol. 2019 Jan;26(1):27-40
pubmed: 30300457
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018 Apr;19(5):483-498
pubmed: 29528247
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Feb;69(2):237-44
pubmed: 22706618
Mult Scler. 2009 Sep;15(9):1037-42
pubmed: 19692433
Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2013 Jun;13(3):470-5
pubmed: 23522967
CNS Drugs. 2014 Feb;28(2):89-94
pubmed: 24343726
Neurol Ther. 2014 Nov 20;3(2):133-8
pubmed: 26000229
Front Immunol. 2018 Nov 23;9:2706
pubmed: 30532753
BMJ. 2005 Mar 12;330(7491):571
pubmed: 15722368
Neurology. 2010 Nov 16;75(20):1794-802
pubmed: 21079181
CNS Drugs. 2015 Mar;29(3):207-20
pubmed: 25773609
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2014 Apr;170(4):247-65
pubmed: 24684929