Virtual 2D angiography from four-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (4D-DSA): A feasibility study.
Digital subtraction angiography
brain arteriovenous malformation(s)
dose area product
dural arteriovenous fistulas(s)
intracerebral hemorrhage
Journal
Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences
ISSN: 2385-2011
Titre abrégé: Interv Neuroradiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9602695
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
29
9
2020
medline:
25
11
2021
entrez:
28
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) remains the gold standard for angiographic evaluation of cerebrovascular pathology, however, multiple acquisitions requiring additional time and radiation are often needed. In contrast, 3D-DSA provides volumetric information from a single injection but neglects temporal information. Four-dimensional-DSA (4D-DSA) combines temporal information of 2D-DSA with volumetric information of 3D-DSA to provide time-resolved tomographic 3D reconstructions, potentially reducing procedure time and radiation. This work evaluates the diagnostic quality of virtual single-frame 4D-DSA relative to 2D-DSA images by assessing clinicians' ability to evaluate cerebrovascular pathology. Single-frame images of four projections from 4D-DSA and their corresponding 2D-DSA images (n = 15) were rated by two neurointerventional radiologists. Images were graded based on diagnostic quality (0 = non-diagnostic, 1 = poor, 2 = acceptable, 3 = good). Dose area product (DAP) for each case was recorded for all 2D-DSA, 4D-DSA acquisitions, and the overall procedure. The mean diagnostic quality of all four 4D-DSA projections from both raters was 1.75 while the mean of 2D-DSA projections was 2.8. Student's t-test revealed significant difference in diagnostic quality between 4D-DSA and 2D-DSA at all four projections (p < 0.001). On average 4D-DSA acquisitions accounted for 30% dose compared to the overall average aggregated dose per procedure. The difference in image quality between virtual single-frame 4D-DSA and their respective 2D-DSA images is statistically significant. Furthermore, 4D-DSA acquisitions require less radiation dose than conventional procedures with 2D-DSA acquisitions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) remains the gold standard for angiographic evaluation of cerebrovascular pathology, however, multiple acquisitions requiring additional time and radiation are often needed. In contrast, 3D-DSA provides volumetric information from a single injection but neglects temporal information. Four-dimensional-DSA (4D-DSA) combines temporal information of 2D-DSA with volumetric information of 3D-DSA to provide time-resolved tomographic 3D reconstructions, potentially reducing procedure time and radiation. This work evaluates the diagnostic quality of virtual single-frame 4D-DSA relative to 2D-DSA images by assessing clinicians' ability to evaluate cerebrovascular pathology.
METHODS
METHODS
Single-frame images of four projections from 4D-DSA and their corresponding 2D-DSA images (n = 15) were rated by two neurointerventional radiologists. Images were graded based on diagnostic quality (0 = non-diagnostic, 1 = poor, 2 = acceptable, 3 = good). Dose area product (DAP) for each case was recorded for all 2D-DSA, 4D-DSA acquisitions, and the overall procedure.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The mean diagnostic quality of all four 4D-DSA projections from both raters was 1.75 while the mean of 2D-DSA projections was 2.8. Student's t-test revealed significant difference in diagnostic quality between 4D-DSA and 2D-DSA at all four projections (p < 0.001). On average 4D-DSA acquisitions accounted for 30% dose compared to the overall average aggregated dose per procedure.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The difference in image quality between virtual single-frame 4D-DSA and their respective 2D-DSA images is statistically significant. Furthermore, 4D-DSA acquisitions require less radiation dose than conventional procedures with 2D-DSA acquisitions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32985291
doi: 10.1177/1591019920961604
pmc: PMC8050537
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
307-313Références
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Oct;34(10):1914-21
pubmed: 23620072
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Apr;39(4):727-733
pubmed: 29496725
J Neuroradiol. 2018 May;45(3):177-185
pubmed: 29274362
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009 Jul;20(7 Suppl):S263-73
pubmed: 19560006
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Oct;39(10):1871-1877
pubmed: 30213811
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Jun;38(6):1169-1176
pubmed: 28408632
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Mar;8(3):300-4
pubmed: 25583531
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Apr;38(4):729-734
pubmed: 28279986
Neuroradiology. 2017 Jun;59(6):625-633
pubmed: 28349170
Med Phys. 2018 Oct;45(10):4510-4518
pubmed: 30102773
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Sep;9(9):887-894
pubmed: 27492375
Clin Neuroradiol. 2017 Dec;27(4):443-450
pubmed: 28289757