Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in a large nationwide sample of patients on dialysis in the USA: a cross-sectional study.
Journal
Lancet (London, England)
ISSN: 1474-547X
Titre abrégé: Lancet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985213R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 10 2020
24 10 2020
Historique:
received:
16
08
2020
revised:
04
09
2020
accepted:
10
09
2020
pubmed:
29
9
2020
medline:
20
8
2021
entrez:
28
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Many patients receiving dialysis in the USA share the socioeconomic characteristics of underserved communities, and undergo routine monthly laboratory testing, facilitating a practical, unbiased, and repeatable assessment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seroprevalence. For this cross-sectional study, in partnership with a central laboratory that receives samples from approximately 1300 dialysis facilities across the USA, we tested the remainder plasma of 28 503 randomly selected adult patients receiving dialysis in July, 2020, using a spike protein receptor binding domain total antibody chemiluminescence assay (100% sensitivity, 99·8% specificity). We extracted data on age, sex, race and ethnicity, and residence and facility ZIP codes from the anonymised electronic health records, linking patient-level residence data with cumulative and daily cases and deaths per 100 000 population and with nasal swab test positivity rates. We standardised prevalence estimates according to the overall US dialysis and adult population, and present estimates for four prespecified strata (age, sex, region, and race and ethnicity). The sampled population had similar age, sex, and race and ethnicity distribution to the US dialysis population, with a higher proportion of older people, men, and people living in majority Black and Hispanic neighbourhoods than in the US adult population. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 was 8·0% (95% CI 7·7-8·4) in the sample, 8·3% (8·0-8·6) when standardised to the US dialysis population, and 9·3% (8·8-9·9) when standardised to the US adult population. When standardised to the US dialysis population, seroprevalence ranged from 3·5% (3·1-3·9) in the west to 27·2% (25·9-28·5) in the northeast. Comparing seroprevalent and case counts per 100 000 population, we found that 9·2% (8·7-9·8) of seropositive patients were diagnosed. When compared with other measures of SARS-CoV-2 spread, seroprevalence correlated best with deaths per 100 000 population (Spearman's ρ=0·77). Residents of non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic neighbourhoods experienced higher odds of seropositivity (odds ratio 3·9 [95% CI 3·4-4·6] and 2·3 [1·9-2·6], respectively) compared with residents of predominantly non-Hispanic white neighbourhoods. Residents of neighbourhoods in the highest population density quintile experienced increased odds of seropositivity (10·3 [8·7-12·2]) compared with residents of the lowest density quintile. County mobility restrictions that reduced workplace visits by at least 5% in early March, 2020, were associated with lower odds of seropositivity in July, 2020 (0·4 [0·3-0·5]) when compared with a reduction of less than 5%. During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, fewer than 10% of the US adult population formed antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, and fewer than 10% of those with antibodies were diagnosed. Public health efforts to limit SARS-CoV-2 spread need to especially target racial and ethnic minority and densely populated communities. Ascend Clinical Laboratories.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Many patients receiving dialysis in the USA share the socioeconomic characteristics of underserved communities, and undergo routine monthly laboratory testing, facilitating a practical, unbiased, and repeatable assessment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seroprevalence.
METHODS
For this cross-sectional study, in partnership with a central laboratory that receives samples from approximately 1300 dialysis facilities across the USA, we tested the remainder plasma of 28 503 randomly selected adult patients receiving dialysis in July, 2020, using a spike protein receptor binding domain total antibody chemiluminescence assay (100% sensitivity, 99·8% specificity). We extracted data on age, sex, race and ethnicity, and residence and facility ZIP codes from the anonymised electronic health records, linking patient-level residence data with cumulative and daily cases and deaths per 100 000 population and with nasal swab test positivity rates. We standardised prevalence estimates according to the overall US dialysis and adult population, and present estimates for four prespecified strata (age, sex, region, and race and ethnicity).
FINDINGS
The sampled population had similar age, sex, and race and ethnicity distribution to the US dialysis population, with a higher proportion of older people, men, and people living in majority Black and Hispanic neighbourhoods than in the US adult population. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 was 8·0% (95% CI 7·7-8·4) in the sample, 8·3% (8·0-8·6) when standardised to the US dialysis population, and 9·3% (8·8-9·9) when standardised to the US adult population. When standardised to the US dialysis population, seroprevalence ranged from 3·5% (3·1-3·9) in the west to 27·2% (25·9-28·5) in the northeast. Comparing seroprevalent and case counts per 100 000 population, we found that 9·2% (8·7-9·8) of seropositive patients were diagnosed. When compared with other measures of SARS-CoV-2 spread, seroprevalence correlated best with deaths per 100 000 population (Spearman's ρ=0·77). Residents of non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic neighbourhoods experienced higher odds of seropositivity (odds ratio 3·9 [95% CI 3·4-4·6] and 2·3 [1·9-2·6], respectively) compared with residents of predominantly non-Hispanic white neighbourhoods. Residents of neighbourhoods in the highest population density quintile experienced increased odds of seropositivity (10·3 [8·7-12·2]) compared with residents of the lowest density quintile. County mobility restrictions that reduced workplace visits by at least 5% in early March, 2020, were associated with lower odds of seropositivity in July, 2020 (0·4 [0·3-0·5]) when compared with a reduction of less than 5%.
INTERPRETATION
During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, fewer than 10% of the US adult population formed antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, and fewer than 10% of those with antibodies were diagnosed. Public health efforts to limit SARS-CoV-2 spread need to especially target racial and ethnic minority and densely populated communities.
FUNDING
Ascend Clinical Laboratories.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32987007
pii: S0140-6736(20)32009-2
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32009-2
pmc: PMC7518804
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Viral
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1335-1344Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK127138
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Références
BMC Nephrol. 2014 Dec 04;15:192
pubmed: 25471628
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Aug;8(8):e1018-e1026
pubmed: 32622400
J Travel Med. 2020 May 18;27(3):
pubmed: 32227186
Ann Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;48:23-29.e4
pubmed: 32648546
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):533-534
pubmed: 32087114
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2016933
pubmed: 32721026
JAMA. 2020 May 19;323(19):1891-1892
pubmed: 32293639
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1171-1172
pubmed: 32719488
Kidney Int. 2020 Jul;98(1):20-26
pubmed: 32437768
Am J Med. 2009 Jul;122(7):672-8
pubmed: 19559170
Nephrology (Carlton). 2010 Mar;15(2):137-45
pubmed: 20470270
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Feb 7;13(2):265-273
pubmed: 29348264
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Feb;19(2):356-64
pubmed: 18057219
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jan;34(1):16-22
pubmed: 18083446
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Oct 1;180(10):1345-1355
pubmed: 32667669
JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2425-2427
pubmed: 32421144
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;20(9):1051-1060
pubmed: 32539986
Lancet. 2020 Aug 1;396(10247):313-319
pubmed: 32534626
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1193-1195
pubmed: 32504052
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 17;69(15):465-471
pubmed: 32298250
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 27;383(9):885-886
pubmed: 32530584
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Oct 20;173(8):614-622
pubmed: 32628534
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jul 21;:
pubmed: 32692365
Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26(6):845-848
pubmed: 32350462
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Sep;31(9):1969-1975
pubmed: 32732391
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;20(9):e245-e249
pubmed: 32687805
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 21;16(4):e0249271
pubmed: 33882054
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003 Nov;14(11):2902-7
pubmed: 14569100
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104544
pubmed: 32663788
Prev Med. 2014 Jan;58:33-9
pubmed: 24161713
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 May 26;58(6):
pubmed: 32229605
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jul 23;172(14):1071-7
pubmed: 22733312
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 May 17;50(2):410-419
pubmed: 33615345
Lancet. 2020 Aug 22;396(10250):535-544
pubmed: 32645347
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Jun 12;69(23):714-721
pubmed: 32525850