Multiplex Solid-Phase Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction without DNA Extraction: A Rapid Intraoperative Diagnosis Using Microvolumes.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Animals
Aqueous Humor
/ parasitology
DNA Primers
/ chemistry
DNA, Protozoan
/ isolation & purification
DNA, Viral
/ isolation & purification
Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological
Eye Infections, Parasitic
/ diagnosis
Eye Infections, Viral
/ diagnosis
Female
Humans
Intraoperative Period
Male
Middle Aged
Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
/ methods
Parasites
/ genetics
Parasitic Diseases
/ diagnosis
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Uveitis
/ parasitology
Virus Diseases
/ diagnosis
Viruses
/ genetics
Vitreous Body
/ parasitology
Diagnosis
Infection
Multiplex polymerase chain reaction
Real-time polymerase chain reaction
Uveitis
Journal
Ophthalmology
ISSN: 1549-4713
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802443
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
received:
24
05
2020
revised:
17
08
2020
accepted:
22
09
2020
pubmed:
29
9
2020
medline:
9
10
2021
entrez:
28
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Current polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods for the diagnosis of infections are time consuming and require large sample volume and skilled technicians. We developed a novel, easy-to-use, and rapid (processing time, 1 minute; total time, 33 minutes) multiplex real-time PCR test (Direct Strip PCR) that did not require DNA extraction to detect 9 pathogens that could cause uveitis in 20-μl samples. Multicenter prospective evaluation of a diagnostic PCR test. A total of 511 participants (patients with infectious uveitis and controls) were examined at 18 institutes worldwide. After validation, intraocular fluid samples were subjected to etiologic or exclusive diagnosis, including intraoperative rapid diagnosis. The concordance and correlations between Direct Strip PCR and quantitative PCR (qPCR) results. Direct Strip PCR exhibited rapid detection, good repeatability and specificity, long storage stability, and detection ability equal to that of qPCR. It also showed low interinstitutional variability compared with qPCR, even when PCR beginners used various real-time PCR machines. The Direct Strip PCR for 9 pathogens exhibited high concordance against the qPCR (positive concordance rate, 98.8%-100%; negative concordance rate, 99.8%-100%; κ coefficient, 0.969-1.000; P < 0.001-0.031). Additionally, results obtained using Direct Strip PCR and qPCR were highly correlated (ρ = 0.748; P < 0.001). This assay was used for rapid intraoperative diagnosis. The Direct Strip PCR test may improve the prognosis of various infectious diseases because it facilitates rapid etiologic evaluation at the first hospital visit and can be used for intraoperative diagnosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32987046
pii: S0161-6420(20)30933-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.09.028
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA Primers
0
DNA, Protozoan
0
DNA, Viral
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
729-739Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.