Motor outcome after perinatal stroke and early prediction of unilateral spastic cerebral palsy.
Cerebral palsy
Early prediction
General movements
Hand assessment
Motor development
Perinatal stroke
Journal
European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society
ISSN: 1532-2130
Titre abrégé: Eur J Paediatr Neurol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9715169
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
09
03
2020
revised:
11
08
2020
accepted:
07
09
2020
pubmed:
30
9
2020
medline:
16
3
2021
entrez:
29
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Unilateral spastic cerebral palsy (USCP) occurs in 30%-68% of infants with perinatal stroke. Early detection of USCP is essential for referring infants to early intervention. The aims of this study were to report motor outcomes after perinatal stroke, and to determine the predictive value of the General Movements Assessment (GMA) and Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI) for detection of USCP. This was a prospective observational study involving infants with perinatal stroke. GMA was conducted between 10 and 15 weeks post term-age (PTA). The HAI was performed between 3 and 5 months PTA. Motor outcome was collected between 12 and 36 months PTA. The sample consisted of 46 infants. Fifteen children (32.6%) were diagnosed with CP, two children with bilateral CP and 13 with USCP. Abnormal GMA had a sensitivity of 85% (95% confidence interval [CI] 55-98%) and a specificity of 52% (95% CI 33-71%) to predict USCP. When asymmetrically presented FMs were also considered as abnormal, sensitivity increased to 100%, hence the specificity declined to 43%. A HAI asymmetry index cut-off of 23, had both a sensitivity and a specificity of 100% to detect USCP. Using GMA and HAI can enable prediction of USCP before the age of 5 months in infants with perinatal stroke. Nevertheless, GMA must be interpreted with caution in this particular population. The HAI was found to be a very accurate screening tool for early detection of asymmetry and prediction of USCP.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Unilateral spastic cerebral palsy (USCP) occurs in 30%-68% of infants with perinatal stroke. Early detection of USCP is essential for referring infants to early intervention. The aims of this study were to report motor outcomes after perinatal stroke, and to determine the predictive value of the General Movements Assessment (GMA) and Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI) for detection of USCP.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
This was a prospective observational study involving infants with perinatal stroke. GMA was conducted between 10 and 15 weeks post term-age (PTA). The HAI was performed between 3 and 5 months PTA. Motor outcome was collected between 12 and 36 months PTA.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The sample consisted of 46 infants. Fifteen children (32.6%) were diagnosed with CP, two children with bilateral CP and 13 with USCP. Abnormal GMA had a sensitivity of 85% (95% confidence interval [CI] 55-98%) and a specificity of 52% (95% CI 33-71%) to predict USCP. When asymmetrically presented FMs were also considered as abnormal, sensitivity increased to 100%, hence the specificity declined to 43%. A HAI asymmetry index cut-off of 23, had both a sensitivity and a specificity of 100% to detect USCP.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Using GMA and HAI can enable prediction of USCP before the age of 5 months in infants with perinatal stroke. Nevertheless, GMA must be interpreted with caution in this particular population. The HAI was found to be a very accurate screening tool for early detection of asymmetry and prediction of USCP.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32988734
pii: S1090-3798(20)30185-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2020.09.002
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
54-61Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 European Paediatric Neurology Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.