Patient experiences of the urgent cancer referral pathway-Can the NHS do better? Semi-structured interviews with patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer.


Journal

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy
ISSN: 1369-7625
Titre abrégé: Health Expect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815926

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2020
Historique:
received: 12 03 2020
revised: 28 07 2020
accepted: 08 09 2020
pubmed: 30 9 2020
medline: 10 8 2021
entrez: 29 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Timeliness is viewed as a key feature of health-care quality. Internationally, this is challenging. In England, cancer waiting time targets are currently not being met. For example, between 2015 and 2018 only 71% of patients with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer started treatment within the recommended 62 days of referral. We explored patients' experiences to identify areas for service improvement. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Twenty patients who were referred through the urgent (two-week) GP referral route and were within six months of receiving first treatment were recruited. Data from the interviews were analysed thematically. Four themes were developed: organization of care; diagnosis; support; and views and expectations of the NHS. Patients described cross-cutting issues such as complex and varied pathways and uncertainty about what would happen next. They felt daunted by the intensity and speed of investigations. They were presented with a recommended course of action rather than options and had little involvement in decision making. They were grateful for care, reluctant to complain and resigned to the status quo. In order to meet patient needs, the NHS needs to improve communication and streamline pathways. Future cancer pathways also need to be designed to support shared decision making, be truly person-centred and informed by patient experience.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Timeliness is viewed as a key feature of health-care quality. Internationally, this is challenging. In England, cancer waiting time targets are currently not being met. For example, between 2015 and 2018 only 71% of patients with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer started treatment within the recommended 62 days of referral.
OBJECTIVE
We explored patients' experiences to identify areas for service improvement.
DESIGN
Semi-structured interviews were conducted.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS
Twenty patients who were referred through the urgent (two-week) GP referral route and were within six months of receiving first treatment were recruited.
DATA ANALYSIS
Data from the interviews were analysed thematically.
RESULTS
Four themes were developed: organization of care; diagnosis; support; and views and expectations of the NHS. Patients described cross-cutting issues such as complex and varied pathways and uncertainty about what would happen next. They felt daunted by the intensity and speed of investigations. They were presented with a recommended course of action rather than options and had little involvement in decision making. They were grateful for care, reluctant to complain and resigned to the status quo.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
In order to meet patient needs, the NHS needs to improve communication and streamline pathways. Future cancer pathways also need to be designed to support shared decision making, be truly person-centred and informed by patient experience.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32989907
doi: 10.1111/hex.13136
pmc: PMC7752202
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1512-1522

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Feb;69(679):e146-e153
pubmed: 30642907
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):379-386
pubmed: 28960630
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1493-1505
pubmed: 31521509
Br J Cancer. 2013 Mar 5;108(4):775-83
pubmed: 23392081
BMC Cancer. 2015 May 20;15:421
pubmed: 25990247
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 21;6(7):e012559
pubmed: 27443554
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Oct;127(1):75-82
pubmed: 22750127
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec;13(12):740-749
pubmed: 27458007
Psychol Health. 2010 Dec;25(10):1229-45
pubmed: 20204937
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Apr;13(2):310-7
pubmed: 17378881
Br J Cancer. 2015 Sep 1;113(5):848-60
pubmed: 26241817
Acta Oncol. 2013 Jun;52(5):919-32
pubmed: 23581611
Int J Surg. 2017 Jul;43:181-185
pubmed: 28600231
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan 13;11(3):209-217
pubmed: 32419912
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):348-363
pubmed: 30520175
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Apr;14(4):e177-80
pubmed: 21920007
Lancet. 2015 Mar 28;385(9974):1206-18
pubmed: 25479696
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 07;10(8):e0135027
pubmed: 26252203
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jul;14(7):848-53
pubmed: 21920010
J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Aug;11(4):453-461
pubmed: 28213769
Thorax. 2013 Jun;68(6):551-64
pubmed: 23399908
Qual Soc Work. 2016 Jan;15(1):118-133
pubmed: 26811696
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Dec;64(629):e775-82
pubmed: 25452542
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 28;6(6):e011938
pubmed: 27354083
Br J Cancer. 2013 Mar 19;108(5):1195-208
pubmed: 23449362
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 May 28;70(695):e389-e398
pubmed: 32312762
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jan;274(1):415-420
pubmed: 27416743
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Dec;17(6):856-62
pubmed: 23732012
Support Care Cancer. 2018 May;26(5):1645-1654
pubmed: 29222597
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 22;12:271
pubmed: 22913525
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 May;101(5):333-339
pubmed: 31042431
Postgrad Med J. 2019 Sep;95(1127):470-475
pubmed: 31147396
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Jan;66(642):12-3
pubmed: 26719459
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2016 Sep;25(5):719-33
pubmed: 26412025
Lancet. 2011 Jan 8;377(9760):127-38
pubmed: 21183212
BMJ. 2017 Apr 18;357:j1744
pubmed: 28420639
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Apr;29(4):296-303
pubmed: 31586938
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Feb;69(679):e106-e111
pubmed: 30642909
Thorax. 2018 Jun;73(6):530-537
pubmed: 29511056
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2010 Jan 1;19(1):98-109
pubmed: 19552730
Br J Cancer. 2014 Feb 4;110(3):584-92
pubmed: 24366304
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jan;15(1):23-34
pubmed: 24314615
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010 Oct;36(10):977-81
pubmed: 20702059
Int J Cancer. 2013 Feb 1;132(3):676-85
pubmed: 22623157
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 28;17(1):448
pubmed: 28659143
Fam Pract. 2002 Aug;19(4):369-74
pubmed: 12110557
Br J Cancer. 2012 Mar 27;106(7):1262-7
pubmed: 22415239
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Sep;68(674):e594-e603
pubmed: 30104328
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Feb;69(679):e134-e145
pubmed: 30692091
BMJ. 2015 Oct 13;351:h5311
pubmed: 26466605
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51
pubmed: 24979285
BMJ Open. 2013 Feb 13;3(2):
pubmed: 23408076
Health Expect. 2020 Dec;23(6):1512-1522
pubmed: 32989907
BMJ. 2015 Oct 13;351:h5102
pubmed: 26462713
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Aug 26;14:124
pubmed: 23972115

Auteurs

Anna Haste (A)

Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.

Mark Lambert (M)

Public Health England, North East Centre, Newcastle, UK.

Linda Sharp (L)

Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Richard Thomson (R)

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Sarah Sowden (S)

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH