The economic impact of Drosophila suzukii: perceived costs and revenue losses of Swiss cherry, plum and grape growers.
crop damage
growers' survey
invasive species
perceived costs
pest management measures
Journal
Pest management science
ISSN: 1526-4998
Titre abrégé: Pest Manag Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100898744
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
23
04
2020
revised:
13
09
2020
accepted:
29
09
2020
pubmed:
30
9
2020
medline:
15
1
2021
entrez:
29
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Drosophila suzukii can lead to substantial damages in horticultural production. In this article we analyze revenue losses and cost increases due to D. suzukii as perceived of Swiss cherry, plum and grape growers. Moreover, we investigate associations between farm and grower characteristics and revenue losses and perceived costs increases. We surveyed Swiss growers of cherries, plums and grapes repeatedly in the period 2016-2018 (N = 1572). We find that 76% of cherry, plum and grape growers faced additional costs due to D. suzukii. In contrast, yield losses due to D. suzukii infestation were small on average, but nevertheless high for some growers. We find substantial heterogeneity in perceived costs and revenue losses across crops, years and farms. Larger farms are found to face lower perceived additional costs, suggesting scale effects in prevention and control of D. suzukii. Growers with a higher inter-varietal diversity perceived additional costs to be higher. Furthermore, organic farming was negatively associated with expected additional costs. Our results suggest that the economic impact of invasive species such as D. suzukii goes far beyond reductions in yield quantity and quality, but rather stems from higher costs due to the need to establish preventive and control measures. Heterogeneity in costs and revenue losses suggests that policy measures to support growers need to be tailored to crops and farm types. Policies supporting improvements of measures against D. suzukii and other newly occurring alien pests and reduce additional costs such as more efficient preventive and control measures merit further encouragement.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Drosophila suzukii can lead to substantial damages in horticultural production. In this article we analyze revenue losses and cost increases due to D. suzukii as perceived of Swiss cherry, plum and grape growers. Moreover, we investigate associations between farm and grower characteristics and revenue losses and perceived costs increases. We surveyed Swiss growers of cherries, plums and grapes repeatedly in the period 2016-2018 (N = 1572).
RESULTS
RESULTS
We find that 76% of cherry, plum and grape growers faced additional costs due to D. suzukii. In contrast, yield losses due to D. suzukii infestation were small on average, but nevertheless high for some growers. We find substantial heterogeneity in perceived costs and revenue losses across crops, years and farms. Larger farms are found to face lower perceived additional costs, suggesting scale effects in prevention and control of D. suzukii. Growers with a higher inter-varietal diversity perceived additional costs to be higher. Furthermore, organic farming was negatively associated with expected additional costs.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggest that the economic impact of invasive species such as D. suzukii goes far beyond reductions in yield quantity and quality, but rather stems from higher costs due to the need to establish preventive and control measures. Heterogeneity in costs and revenue losses suggests that policy measures to support growers need to be tailored to crops and farm types. Policies supporting improvements of measures against D. suzukii and other newly occurring alien pests and reduce additional costs such as more efficient preventive and control measures merit further encouragement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32990345
doi: 10.1002/ps.6110
pmc: PMC7821377
doi:
Substances chimiques
Drosophila Proteins
0
Nerve Tissue Proteins
0
SWS protein, Drosophila
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
978-1000Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Références
Pest Manag Sci. 2017 Nov;73(11):2318-2327
pubmed: 28523823
Conserv Biol. 2015 Feb;29(1):19-30
pubmed: 25155068
Pest Manag Sci. 2011 Nov;67(11):1349-51
pubmed: 21990168
J Econ Entomol. 2015 Jun;108(3):1148-55
pubmed: 26470240
J Pest Sci (2004). 2016;89(3):735-748
pubmed: 28275324
J Econ Entomol. 2020 Jun 6;113(3):1262-1269
pubmed: 31943106
Pest Manag Sci. 2011 Nov;67(11):1396-402
pubmed: 21815244
Insects. 2019 Jul 13;10(7):
pubmed: 31337036
J Econ Entomol. 2016 Jul 14;109(5):2151-2158
pubmed: 27417641
Pest Manag Sci. 2019 Oct;75(10):2820-2829
pubmed: 30843364
Pest Manag Sci. 2011 Nov;67(11):1375-85
pubmed: 21800409
J Econ Entomol. 2019 Sep 23;112(5):2287-2294
pubmed: 31143945
Insects. 2017 Feb 08;8(1):
pubmed: 28208692
Pest Manag Sci. 2020 Aug;76(8):2787-2798
pubmed: 32216021
Insects. 2019 Aug 14;10(8):
pubmed: 31416215
J Econ Entomol. 2014 Oct 1;107(5):1849-57
pubmed: 26309275
Pest Manag Sci. 2017 Jun;73(6):1083-1090
pubmed: 27943618
Environ Entomol. 2015 Jun;44(3):704-12
pubmed: 26313977