Assessment of Radiation Doses Delivered to Organs at Risk Among Patients With Early-Stage Favorable Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated With Contemporary Radiation Therapy.
Adult
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
Bleomycin
/ administration & dosage
Combined Modality Therapy
/ methods
Dacarbazine
/ administration & dosage
Disease-Free Survival
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
Doxorubicin
/ administration & dosage
Female
Hodgkin Disease
/ drug therapy
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Long Term Adverse Effects
/ etiology
Male
Neoplasm Staging
Organs at Risk
/ pathology
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
/ methods
Radiation Dosage
Radiotherapy
/ methods
Vinblastine
/ administration & dosage
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2020
01 09 2020
Historique:
entrez:
29
9
2020
pubmed:
30
9
2020
medline:
7
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Response-adapted randomized trials have used positron emission tomography-computed tomography to attempt to identify patients with early-stage favorable Hodgkin lymphoma (ESFHL) who could be treated with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) without radiation therapy (RT). While maximal efficacy is demonstrated with combined modality therapy, RT is often omitted in fear of late adverse effects; however, the application of modern RT could limit these toxic effects. To determine the radiation doses delivered to organs at risk with modern involved-site RT among patients with ESFHL treated with 20 Gy after 2 cycles of ABVD. This case series included 42 adult patients with ESFHL (according to the German Hodgkin Study Group criteria) who were treated between 2010 and 2019, achieved complete response by positron emission tomography-computed tomography (1-3 on 5-point scale) following 2 cycles of ABVD, and then received consolidative RT. The study was conducted at a single comprehensive cancer center. 2 cycles of chemotherapy followed by 20-Gy involved-site RT. The medical records of patients with ESFHL were examined. Organs at risk were contoured, and doses were calculated. Progression-free survival, defined from date of diagnosis to disease progression, relapse, or death, and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The cohort comprised 42 patients with ESFHL (median [range] age at diagnosis, 35 [18-74] years; 18 [43%] women; 24 [57%] with stage II disease). At a median follow-up of 44.6 (95% CI, 27.6-61.6) months, the 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 91.2% (95% CI, 74.9%-97.1%) and 97.0% (95% CI, 80.4%-99.6%), respectively. The mean heart dose was less than 5 Gy (mean, 0.8 Gy; SD, 1.5 Gy; range, 0-4.8 Gy) in all patients. The mean (SD) breast dose for both breasts was 0.1 (0.2) Gy (left breast range, 0-1.0 Gy; right breast range, 0-0.9 Gy). In this study, combined modality therapy with 2 cycles of ABVD and 20 Gy for ESFHL was highly effective and avoided excess doses to organs at risk, which may limit long-term toxic effects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32990738
pii: 2770978
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.13935
pmc: PMC7525355
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bleomycin
11056-06-7
Vinblastine
5V9KLZ54CY
Dacarbazine
7GR28W0FJI
Doxorubicin
80168379AG
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2013935Références
Med Dosim. 2012 Winter;37(4):374-82
pubmed: 22513213
Blood. 2017 Apr 20;129(16):2257-2265
pubmed: 28143884
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Jul 1;101(3):530-540
pubmed: 29681481
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):3059-68
pubmed: 25113753
Br J Cancer. 1995 Aug;72(2):511-8
pubmed: 7640241
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jan 1;79(1):10-8
pubmed: 20421148
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Apr 1;82(5):1802-8
pubmed: 21514076
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 May-Jun;4(3):174-180
pubmed: 24766684
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Dec;129(3):449-455
pubmed: 30245037
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;35(16):1786-1794
pubmed: 28291393
Blood. 2018 Oct 18;132(16):1635-1646
pubmed: 30108066
Radiat Oncol. 2014 Apr 15;9:94
pubmed: 24735767
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 12;363(7):640-52
pubmed: 20818855
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 20;28(9):1611-5
pubmed: 20159818
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jan 1;97(1):35-41
pubmed: 27979454
BMJ. 2009 Dec 08;339:b4606
pubmed: 19996459
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jul 15;89(4):854-62
pubmed: 23790512
N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 2;366(5):399-408
pubmed: 22149921
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Sep 15;21(18):3431-9
pubmed: 12885835
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 May 1;107(1):12-17
pubmed: 32142868
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2011;2011:323-9
pubmed: 22160053
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S10-9
pubmed: 20171502
Semin Hematol. 2016 Jul;53(3):209-15
pubmed: 27496313
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Mar 15;82(4):1522-7
pubmed: 21705151
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2835-2845
pubmed: 31498753
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 May 1;92(1):175-82
pubmed: 25863764
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 23;372(17):1598-607
pubmed: 25901426
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 24;373(26):2499-511
pubmed: 26699166
Recent Results Cancer Res. 1989;117:142-62
pubmed: 2690225
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 10;28(8):1308-15
pubmed: 20142603
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 20;34(3):235-43
pubmed: 26573075
JAMA. 2003 Jul 23;290(4):465-75
pubmed: 12876089