Artificial Intelligence in Spine Care.
Journal
Clinical spine surgery
ISSN: 2380-0194
Titre abrégé: Clin Spine Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101675083
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2021
01 05 2021
Historique:
received:
05
04
2019
accepted:
13
07
2020
pubmed:
30
9
2020
medline:
26
10
2021
entrez:
29
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Artificial intelligence is an exciting and growing field in medicine to assist in the proper diagnosis of patients. Although the use of artificial intelligence in orthopedics is currently limited, its utility in other fields has been extremely valuable and could be useful in orthopedics, especially spine care. Automated systems have the ability to analyze complex patterns and images, which will allow for enhanced analysis of imaging. Although the potential impact of artificial intelligence integration into spine care is promising, there are several limitations that must be overcome. Our goal is to review current advances that machine learning has been used for in orthopedics, and discuss potential application to spine care in the clinical setting in which there is a need for the development of automated systems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32991359
pii: 01933606-202105000-00002
doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001082
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
121-124Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Dr Schroeder has received funds to travel from AOSpine and Medtronic. Dr Vaccaro has consulted or has done independent contracting for DePuy, Medtronic, Stryker Spine, Globus, Stout Medical, Gerson Lehrman Group, Guidepoint Global, Medacorp, Innovative Surgical Design, Orthobullets, Ellipse, and Vertex. He has also served on the scientific advisory board/board of directors/committees for Flagship Surgical, AOSpine, Innovative Surgical Design, and Association of Collaborative Spine Research. Dr Vaccaro has received royalty payments from Medtronic, Stryker Spine, Globus, Aesculap, Thieme, Jaypee, Elsevier, and Taylor Francis/Hodder and Stoughton. He has stock/stock option ownership interests in Replication Medica, Globus, Paradigm Spine, Stout Medical, Progressive Spinal Technologies, Advanced Spinal Intellectual Properties, Spine Medica, Computational Biodynamics, Spinology, In Vivo, Flagship Surgical, Cytonics, Bonovo Orthopaedics, Electrocore, Gamma Spine, Location Based Intelligence, FlowPharma, R.S.I., Rothman Institute and Related Properties, Innovative Surgical Design, and Avaz Surgical. In addition, Dr Vaccaro has also provided expert testimony. He has also served as deputy editor/editor of Clinical Spine Surgery. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Panchmatia JR, Visenio MR, Panch T. The role of artificial intelligence in orthopaedic surgery. Br J Hosp Med. 2018;79:676–681.
Berlyand Y, Raja AS, Dorner SC, et al. How artificial intelligence could transform emergency department operations. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36:1515–1517.
Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2:230–243.
Tu JV. Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:1225–1231.
Sadatsafavi M, Moayyeri A, Soltani A, et al. Artificial neural networks in prediction of bone density among post-menopausal women. J Endocrinol Invest. 2005;28:425–431.
Azimi P, Mohammadi HR, Benzel EC, et al. Artificial neural networks in neurosurgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86:251–256.
Kim JS, Merrill RK, Arvind V, et al. Examining the ability of artificial neural networks machine learning models to accurately predict complications following posterior lumbar spine fusion. Spine. 2018;43:853–860.
Kim JS, Arvind V, Oermann EK, et al. Predicting surgical complications in patients undergoing elective adult spinal deformity procedures using machine learning. Spine Deform. 2018;6:762–770.
Azimi P, Benzel EC, Shahzadi S, et al. Use of artificial neural networks to predict surgical satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20:300–305.
Erickson BJ, Korfiatis P, Akkus Z, et al. Machine learning for medical imaging. Radiographics. 2017;37:505–515.
Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017;542:115–118.
Morton MJ, Whaley DH, Brandt KR, et al. Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection—prospective evaluation. Radiology. 2006;239:375–383.
Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Koerner JD, et al. Is there a regional difference in morphology interpretation of A3 and A4 fractures among different cultures? J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24:332–339.
Olczak J, Fahlberg N, Maki A, et al. Artificial intelligence for analyzing orthopedic trauma radiographs. Acta Orthop. 2017;88:581–586.
Burns JE, Yao J, Wiese TS, et al. Automated detection of sclerotic metastases in the thoracolumbar spine at CT. Radiology. 2013;268:69–78.
Burns JE, Yao J, Muñoz H, et al. Automated detection, localization, and classification of traumatic vertebral body fractures in the thoracic and lumbar spine at CT. Radiology. 2016;278:64–73.
Gundry M, Knapp K, Meertens R, et al. Computer-aided detection in musculoskeletal projection radiography: a systematic review. Radiography. 2018;24:165–174.
Jamaludin A, Lootus M, Kadir T, et al. ISSLS Prize in Bioengineering Science 2017: automation of reading of radiological features from magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the lumbar spine without human intervention is comparable with an expert radiologist. Eur Spine J. 2017;26:1374–1383.
Hetherington J, Lessoway V, Gunka V, et al. SLIDE: automatic spine level identification system using a deep convolutional neural network. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017;12:1189–1198.
Scheer JK, Smith JS, Schwab F, et al. Development of a preoperative predictive model for major complications following adult spinal deformity surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;26:736–743.
Gazelle GS, Kessler L, Lee DW, et al. A framework for assessing the value of diagnostic imaging in the era of comparative effectiveness research. Radiology. 2011;261:692–698.
Vaccaro AR, Oner C, Kepler CK, et al. AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers. Spine. 2013;38:2028–2037.
Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR, Koerner JD, et al. Reliability analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by a worldwide group of naïve spinal surgeons. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:1082–1086.
Russakovsky O, Deng J, Su H, et al. Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. Int J Comput. 2015;115:211–252.
Leachman SA, Merlino G. Medicine: the final frontier in cancer diagnosis. Nature. 2017;542:36–38.
Berg HE. Will intelligent machine learning revolutionize orthopedic imaging? Acta Orthop. 2017;88:577.
Ginneken BV. Fifty years of computer analysis in chest imaging: rule-based, machine learning, deep learning. Radiol Phys Technol. 2017;10:23–32.