Primary Stability of Revision Acetabular Reconstructions Using an Innovative Bone Graft Substitute: A Comparative Biomechanical Study on Cadaveric Pelvises.
biomechanical testing
in vitro stability
revision hip surgery
severe contained acetabular defects
synthetic bone graft substitute
Journal
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Sep 2020
27 Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
05
09
2020
revised:
23
09
2020
accepted:
24
09
2020
entrez:
30
9
2020
pubmed:
1
10
2020
medline:
1
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hip implant failure is mainly due to aseptic loosening of the cotyle and is typically accompanied by defects in the acetabular region. Revision surgery aims to repair such defects before implantation by means of reconstruction materials, whose morselized bone graft represents the gold standard. Due to the limited availability of bone tissue, synthetic substitutes are also used. The aim of this study was to evaluate if a synthetic fully resorbable tri-calcium phosphate-based substitute can provide adequate mechanical stability when employed to restore severe, contained defects, in comparison with morselized bone graft. Five cadaveric pelvises were adopted, one side was reconstructed with morselized bone graft and the other with the synthetic substitute, consisting of dense calcium phosphate granules within a collagen matrix. During the biomechanical test, cyclic load packages of increasing magnitude were applied to each specimen until failure. Bone/implant motions were measured through Digital Image Correlation and were expressed in terms of permanent and inducible translations and rotations. The reconstruction types exhibited a similar behavior, consisting of an initial settling trend followed by failure as bone fracture (i.e., no failure of the reconstruction material). When 2.2 Body Weight was applied, the permanent translations were not significantly different between the two reconstructions (
Identifiants
pubmed: 32992567
pii: ma13194312
doi: 10.3390/ma13194312
pmc: PMC7579522
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Aesculap AG, Research & Development, Tuttlingen, Germany
ID : Research funds to Dept. of Industrial Engineering of University of Bologna
Organisme : Aesculap AG, Research & Development, Tuttlingen, Germany
ID : Research funds to IRCCS Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute
Références
Med Eng Phys. 2010 Jan;32(1):95-100
pubmed: 19889565
J Arthroplasty. 2003 Dec;18(8):1056-63
pubmed: 14658112
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Apr;25(3):425-31
pubmed: 19375888
Int Orthop. 2017 Mar;41(3):583-588
pubmed: 28078362
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 17;14(10):e0222511
pubmed: 31622343
J Orthop Res. 2018 Jun;36(6):1645-1652
pubmed: 29194747
Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec;83(6):583-91
pubmed: 23126575
J Orthop Trauma. 2011 Aug;25(8):459-61
pubmed: 21738060
Acta Orthop. 2006 Apr;77(2):227-33
pubmed: 16752283
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jun;33(6):1838-1843
pubmed: 29510951
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Jul;(208):108-13
pubmed: 3720113
Materials (Basel). 2019 Oct 23;12(21):
pubmed: 31652704
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993 Jan;75(1):14-21
pubmed: 8421012
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Apr;29(4):757-62
pubmed: 24269067
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013 Oct;101(7):1243-50
pubmed: 23650084
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Oct;101(6):667-73
pubmed: 26300456
J Orthop Res. 2020 Jul 21;:
pubmed: 32691903
Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2008;10(3):3-6
pubmed: 19152466
J Arthroplasty. 2012 Feb;27(2):305-9
pubmed: 21778033
J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1481-1486
pubmed: 29291910
J Arthroplasty. 2003 Oct;18(7):852-9
pubmed: 14566739
Acta Orthop Scand. 1984 Dec;55(6):593-6
pubmed: 6395620
Biomaterials. 1993 May;14(6):403-6
pubmed: 8507785