Covid-19 and rural landscape: The case of Italy.
Journal
Landscape and urban planning
ISSN: 0169-2046
Titre abrégé: Landsc Urban Plan
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101087690
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
29
05
2020
revised:
10
09
2020
accepted:
13
09
2020
entrez:
30
9
2020
pubmed:
1
10
2020
medline:
1
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Throughout the covid-19 emergency, health authorities have presented contagion data divided by administrative regions with no reference to the type of landscape, environment or development model. This study has been conducted to understand whether there is a correlation between the number of infections and the different rural landscapes of the country. Italy's rural landscape can be classified in four types, according to the intensity of energy inputs used in the agricultural process, socioeconomic and environmental features. Type A includes areas of periurban agriculture surrounding the metropolitan cities, type B areas of intensive agriculture with high concentration of agroindustry, type C hilly areas with highly diversified agriculture and valuable landscape, and type D high hills and mountains with forests and protected areas. Areas A and B are located in the plains, covering 21% of the territory and accounting for 57% of the population. They produce most of the added value, consume high levels of energy and represent the main source of pollution. Areas C and D cover 79% of the territory and 43% of the population. We find that provinces with 10% more type C and D areas exhibit on average 10% fewer cases of contagion. The result is statistically significant, after controlling for demographic, economic and environmental characteristics of the provinces. The pollution produced in more energy-intensive landscape has triggered an intense debate of how to ensure the economic competitiveness of Italian agriculture, without compromising environmental integrity or public health. Our findings speak to this debate, by suggesting that planning for more rural territory with lower energy inputs may come with the added benefit of new development opportunities and decreasing the exposure of the population to covid-19. Cost benefit-analyses should take into account that policies aimed at revitalizing more rural areas may reduce the economic impact of covid-19 and of potential future pandemics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32994653
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103955
pii: S0169-2046(20)30815-X
pmc: PMC7515565
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
103955Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors.
Références
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 31;15(3):e0230405
pubmed: 32231374
Agric Human Values. 2020 May 2;:1-2
pubmed: 32362722
Environ Resour Econ (Dordr). 2020 Aug 4;:1-13
pubmed: 32836856
Science. 2001 Apr 13;292(5515):281-4
pubmed: 11303102
Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2013 Oct;5(5):464-470
pubmed: 24143156
Agric Human Values. 2020 May 13;:1-2
pubmed: 32412547
Nature. 2002 Aug 8;418(6898):671-7
pubmed: 12167873
Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr. 2020 Jun 19;:
pubmed: 32836489
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 8;14(11):e0218582
pubmed: 31703059
Food Secur. 2020 Jul 7;:1-4
pubmed: 32837635
Nature. 2020 Apr;580(7805):588-589
pubmed: 32327745