Automatic speech recognition in the operating room - An essential contemporary tool or a redundant gadget? A survey evaluation among physicians in form of a qualitative study.
Artificial intelligence
Automatic speech recognition
Intelligent operating assistance
Machine learning
Operating room of the future
Speech understanding
Voice recognition
Journal
Annals of medicine and surgery (2012)
ISSN: 2049-0801
Titre abrégé: Ann Med Surg (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101616869
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
04
09
2020
accepted:
06
09
2020
entrez:
30
9
2020
pubmed:
1
10
2020
medline:
1
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
For decades, automatic speech recognition (ASR) has been the subject of research and its range of applications broadened. Presently, ASR among physicians is mainly used to convert speech into text but not to implement instructions in the operating room (OR). This study aimed to evaluate physicians of different surgical professions on their personal experience and posture towards ASR. A 16-item survey was distributed electronically to hospitals and outpatient clinics in southern Germany addressing physicians on the potential applications of ASR in the OR. The survey was responded by 185 of 2693 physicians (response rate: 6.9%) with a mean age of 41.8 ± 9.8 years. ASR is desirable in the OR regardless of the field of speciality (93.7%). While only 2.7% have used ASR, 87.9% evaluate its future potential as high. 91.0% of those working in a university hospital would consider testing ASR, while 67.5% of those in non-university hospitals and practices (p = 0.001). 90.1% of responders of strictly surgical specialities see potential in ASR while 73.7% in non-surgical specialities evaluate its future potential as high (p = 0.01). 58.3% of those over the age of 60 consider the use of ASR without a headset to be imaginable, while 96.3% among those under the age of 60. There were no statistically significant differences regarding sex and professional position. Foreseeably, ASR is anticipated to be integrated into ORs and valued at a high market potential. Our study provides information about physicians' individual preferences from various surgical disciplines regarding ASR.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32994988
doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.015
pii: S2049-0801(20)30318-6
pmc: PMC7501482
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
81-85Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Nov;20(6):599-609
pubmed: 31274357
World J Urol. 2020 Oct;38(10):2359-2366
pubmed: 31776737
J Interprof Care. 2013 Sep;27(5):387-93
pubmed: 23672607
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:1761-1762
pubmed: 31438331
Innov Surg Sci. 2017 Aug 25;2(3):159-161
pubmed: 31579748
MD Comput. 1995 Jan-Feb;12(1):16-23
pubmed: 7531805
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013 Jun;27(3):528-30
pubmed: 23107015
Surg Neurol Int. 2019 Feb 28;10:26
pubmed: 31123633
Aktuelle Urol. 2018 Dec;49(6):500-508
pubmed: 30522160
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Jul 15;28(2S):818-834
pubmed: 31306595