Port-site implantation of parasitic leiomyoma after laparoscopic myomectomy and its histopathology.

Leiomyoma laparoscopy morcellation parasitic leiomyoma uterine myomectomy

Journal

SAGE open medical case reports
ISSN: 2050-313X
Titre abrégé: SAGE Open Med Case Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101638686

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 29 03 2020
accepted: 26 08 2020
entrez: 30 9 2020
pubmed: 1 10 2020
medline: 1 10 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Although parasitic leiomyoma could be spontaneous or iatrogenic in origin, port-site implantation of parasitic leiomyoma is an iatrogenic benign sequela of laparoscopic surgery. A 30-year-old, primigravida Japanese woman was referred after unresponsiveness to preoperative gonadotropin-releasing hormone for intramural fibroids. Magnetic resonance imaging showed multiple intramural fibroids and left ovarian endometrioma with no malignant features. Laparoscopic myomectomy with power morcellation and ovarian cystectomy were performed, followed by treatment with a combined oral contraceptive. Seven years after the primary surgery, she underwent abdominal myomectomy for a port-site, and peritoneal recurrence of the leiomyoma and intramural leiomyomas was detected. Microscopic examination revealed that resected specimens from the port-site demonstrated leiomyoma with lesser cell density and more prominent hyalinization than those from the uterus. Therefore, clinicians should counsel patients regarding the risks and benefits of laparoscopy with morcellation versus laparotomy. Further development of techniques for uterine tissues extraction is warranted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32995003
doi: 10.1177/2050313X20959223
pii: 10.1177_2050313X20959223
pmc: PMC7502794
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

2050313X20959223

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Références

Maturitas. 2017 Mar;97:1-5
pubmed: 28159054
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Dec;42(12):1874-1877
pubmed: 27641951
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Aug;42(8):990-9
pubmed: 27125448
Fertil Steril. 1997 May;67(5):817-21
pubmed: 9130884
J Gastrointest Surg. 1998 Sep-Oct;2(5):406-14
pubmed: 9843599
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Apr;113(1):3-13
pubmed: 21345435
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;214(2):257.e1-257.e6
pubmed: 26348384
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016 Oct 6;14(1):64
pubmed: 27716434
Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2016;18(2):129-139
pubmed: 27001060
BJOG. 2016 Jan;123(1):76
pubmed: 26335152
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 May;89(5 Pt 2):853-4
pubmed: 9166349
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Aug;203:250-9
pubmed: 27359081
Fertil Steril. 2008 Oct;90(4):1201.e1-2
pubmed: 18410930
J Med Case Rep. 2018 Nov 15;12(1):339
pubmed: 30428912

Auteurs

Kentaro Kai (K)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.

Yoko Aoyagi (Y)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.

Masakazu Nishida (M)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.

Motoki Arakane (M)

Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.

Yasushi Kawano (Y)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.

Hisashi Narahara (H)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.

Classifications MeSH