Obesity Alters Spinopelvic Alignment Changes From Standing to Relaxed Sitting: the Influence of the Soft-tissue Envelope.
BMI
Dislocation
Obesity
Spinopelvic
Total hip arthroplasty
Journal
Arthroplasty today
ISSN: 2352-3441
Titre abrégé: Arthroplast Today
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101681808
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
03
10
2019
revised:
26
01
2020
accepted:
16
02
2020
entrez:
30
9
2020
pubmed:
1
10
2020
medline:
1
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Changes in spinopelvic and lower extremity alignment between standing and relaxed sitting have important clinical implications with regard to stability of total hip arthroplasty. This study aimed to analyze the effect of body mass index (BMI) on lumbopelvic alignment and motion at the hip joint. A retrospective review of patients who underwent full-body stereoradiographs in standing and relaxed sitting for total hip arthroplasty planning was conducted. Spinopelvic parameters measured included spinopelvic tilt (SPT), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI minus LL (PI-LL), proximal femoral shaft angle (PFSA), and standing-to-sitting hip range of motion. Propensity score matching controlled for age, gender, PI, and hip ostoarthritis grade. Patients were stratified into normal (NORMAL; BMI, 18.5-24.9), overweight (OW; 25.0-29.9), and obese (OB; 30.0-34.9) groups. Alignment parameters were compared using one-way analysis of variance. There were 84 patients in each group after propensity score matching. Standing alignment between BMI groups was similar for all parameters ( Significant differences in sitting and standing-to-sitting change in lumbopelvic alignment based on BMI suggest obese patients recruit more posterior spinopelvic tilt when sitting to compensate for soft-tissue impingement that occurs anterior to the hip joint and limiting hip flexion.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Changes in spinopelvic and lower extremity alignment between standing and relaxed sitting have important clinical implications with regard to stability of total hip arthroplasty. This study aimed to analyze the effect of body mass index (BMI) on lumbopelvic alignment and motion at the hip joint.
METHODS
METHODS
A retrospective review of patients who underwent full-body stereoradiographs in standing and relaxed sitting for total hip arthroplasty planning was conducted. Spinopelvic parameters measured included spinopelvic tilt (SPT), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI minus LL (PI-LL), proximal femoral shaft angle (PFSA), and standing-to-sitting hip range of motion. Propensity score matching controlled for age, gender, PI, and hip ostoarthritis grade. Patients were stratified into normal (NORMAL; BMI, 18.5-24.9), overweight (OW; 25.0-29.9), and obese (OB; 30.0-34.9) groups. Alignment parameters were compared using one-way analysis of variance.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There were 84 patients in each group after propensity score matching. Standing alignment between BMI groups was similar for all parameters (
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Significant differences in sitting and standing-to-sitting change in lumbopelvic alignment based on BMI suggest obese patients recruit more posterior spinopelvic tilt when sitting to compensate for soft-tissue impingement that occurs anterior to the hip joint and limiting hip flexion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32995406
doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.02.011
pii: S2352-3441(20)30024-8
pmc: PMC7502584
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
590-595.e1Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors.
Références
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Nov 1;22(21):2571-4
pubmed: 9383867
Phys Ther. 2000 Mar;80(3):261-75
pubmed: 10696153
Eur Spine J. 2007 Sep;16(9):1459-67
pubmed: 17211522
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Mar 10;10:291-6
pubmed: 27022251
EFORT Open Rev. 2017 Mar 13;1(4):83-88
pubmed: 28461933
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Dec 1;35(25):2224-31
pubmed: 21102297
J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1606-1616
pubmed: 29233568
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1995;854:1-452
pubmed: 8594834
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):470-474
pubmed: 27578537
Hip Pelvis. 2019 Mar;31(1):4-10
pubmed: 30899709
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Mar;30(3):387-91
pubmed: 25453626
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010 Jan 18;7:3
pubmed: 20082692
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Dec;453:142-6
pubmed: 17016221
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Feb 15;30(4):427-33
pubmed: 15706340
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jan;33(1):291-296
pubmed: 28939031
Eur Spine J. 2018 Sep;27(9):2294-2302
pubmed: 29417324
Bone Joint J. 2017 May;99-B(5):585-591
pubmed: 28455466
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Aug;474(8):1788-97
pubmed: 27020429
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Jun;87(6):762-9
pubmed: 15911655
J Arthroplasty. 2014 May;29(5):867-71
pubmed: 24211057
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Jan;33(1):48-55
pubmed: 20114100
Ann Rheum Dis. 1957 Dec;16(4):494-502
pubmed: 13498604
Eur Spine J. 2011 Sep;20 Suppl 5:686-98
pubmed: 21796392
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Nov 7;100(21):1845-1853
pubmed: 30399079
Int Orthop. 2011 Jun;35(6):929-34
pubmed: 20512328
Hip Int. 2014 May-Jun;24(3):263-9
pubmed: 24817400
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Dec;465:185-8
pubmed: 17906592
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Sep;93(9):1178-82
pubmed: 21911527
World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:e533-e545
pubmed: 30165222
Spine J. 2017 May;17(5):681-688
pubmed: 27916684
Eur Spine J. 2006 Apr;15(4):415-22
pubmed: 16179995
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Mar;90(3):360-3
pubmed: 18310761
J Arthroplasty. 2017 May;32(5):1635-1640.e1
pubmed: 27998660
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb;469(2):319-29
pubmed: 20717858
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun;32(6):1910-1917
pubmed: 28153459
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Aug;92(8):1066-71
pubmed: 20675748
J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1449-1454
pubmed: 29310920
Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Feb;32(2):211-22
pubmed: 17848940
Neurosurg Focus. 2014 May;36(5):E1
pubmed: 24785474
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Jun;103(4):559-568
pubmed: 28373138
Eur Spine J. 2013 Apr;22(4):878-82
pubmed: 23149493
Spine Deform. 2019 Nov;7(6):923-928
pubmed: 31732003
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2017 Dec;75(4):234-240
pubmed: 29151007