Forecasting and optimizing Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation via ensemble model- fruit fly optimization algorithm: A data mining approach using chrysanthemum databases.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 19 07 2020
accepted: 15 09 2020
entrez: 30 9 2020
pubmed: 1 10 2020
medline: 16 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Optimizing the gene transformation factors can be considered as the first and foremost step in successful genetic engineering and genome editing studies. However, it is usually difficult to achieve an optimized gene transformation protocol due to the cost and time-consuming as well as the complexity of this process. Therefore, it is necessary to use a novel computational approach such as machine learning models for analyzing gene transformation data. In the current study, three individual machine learning models including Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), and Radial Basis Function (RBF) were developed for forecasting Agrobacterium-mediated gene transformation in chrysanthemum based on eleven input variables including Agrobacterium strain, optical density (OD), co-culture period (CCP), and different antibiotics including kanamycin (K), vancomycin (VA), cefotaxime (CF), hygromycin (H), carbenicillin (CA), geneticin (G), ticarcillin (TI), and paromomycin (P). Consequently, best-obtained results were used in the fusion process by bagging method. Results showed that ensemble model with the highest R2 (0.83) had superb performance in comparison with all other individual models (MLP:063, RBF:0.69, and ANFIS: 0.74) in the validation set. Also, ensemble model was linked to Fruit fly optimization algorithm (FOA) for optimizing gene transformation, and the results showed that the maximum gene transformation efficiency (37.54%) can be achieved from EHA105 strain with 0.9 OD600, for 3.8 days CCP, 46.43 mg/l P, 9.54 mg/l K, 18.62 mg/l H, and 4.79 mg/l G as selection antibiotics and 109.74 μg/ml VA, 287.63 μg/ml CF, 334.07 μg/ml CA and 87.36 μg/ml TI as antibiotics in the selection medium. Moreover, sensitivity analysis demonstrated that input variables have a different degree of importance in gene transformation system in the order of Agrobacterium strain > CCP > K > CF > VA > P > OD > CA > H > TI > G. Generally, the developed hybrid model in this study (ensemble model-FOA) can be employed as an accurate and reliable approach in future genetic engineering and genome editing studies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32997694
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239901
pii: PONE-D-20-22401
pmc: PMC7526930
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Bacterial Agents 0
Bacterial Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0239901

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Biotechnology (N Y). 1994 Mar;12(3):268-71
pubmed: 7764487
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Mar 14;10:282
pubmed: 30923529
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 5;9(1):9740
pubmed: 31278299
Protoplasma. 2019 Sep;256(5):1317-1332
pubmed: 31055656
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 26;10(1):3524
pubmed: 32103071
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Aug 11;11:1148
pubmed: 32849706
Pest Manag Sci. 2002 Nov;58(11):1132-6
pubmed: 12449532
J Theor Biol. 2016 May 21;397:199-205
pubmed: 26987421
Plant Cell Rep. 1994 Nov;14(1):59-64
pubmed: 24194229
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Oct 15;9:1474
pubmed: 30374362
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Oct 19;7:1526
pubmed: 27807436
Planta. 2003 Apr;216(6):1003-12
pubmed: 12687368
Planta. 2019 Apr;249(4):953-973
pubmed: 30715560
Plant Cell Rep. 2013 Feb;32(2):309-17
pubmed: 23143691
Plant Cell Rep. 1991 Jan;9(9):505-8
pubmed: 24213790
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jul 05;10:869
pubmed: 31333705
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 2;8(1):9977
pubmed: 29967468
Biotechnol Adv. 2003 Nov;21(8):715-66
pubmed: 14563477
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2018 Dec 5;205:479-488
pubmed: 30059874
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 20;9(1):e85989
pubmed: 24465829
Biol Res. 2015 Jan 13;48:2
pubmed: 25654659
Plant Cell Rep. 1991 Jul;10(4):195-9
pubmed: 24221545
Transgenic Res. 1993 May;2(3):170-80
pubmed: 8353535
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Mar 29;7:274
pubmed: 27066013
Plant Methods. 2019 Nov 18;15:136
pubmed: 31832078
Sci Adv. 2017 Jul 26;3(7):e1602785
pubmed: 28782017
J Plant Physiol. 2011 Oct 15;168(15):1858-65
pubmed: 21676490
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 3;9(1):18237
pubmed: 31796784

Auteurs

Mohsen Hesami (M)

Department of Plant Agriculture, Gosling Research Institute for Plant Preservation, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

Milad Alizadeh (M)

Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Roohangiz Naderi (R)

Department of Horticultural Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.

Masoud Tohidfar (M)

Department of Plant Biotechnology, Faculty of Sciences & Biotechnology, Shahid Beheshti University, G.C., Tehran, Iran.

Articles similaires

Vancomycin-associated DRESS demonstrates delay in AST abnormalities.

Ahmed Hussein, Kateri L Schoettinger, Jourdan Hydol-Smith et al.
1.00
Humans Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome Vancomycin Female Male

Selecting optimal software code descriptors-The case of Java.

Yegor Bugayenko, Zamira Kholmatova, Artem Kruglov et al.
1.00
Software Algorithms Programming Languages
Photosynthesis Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Carbon Dioxide Molecular Dynamics Simulation Cyanobacteria
Humans Arthroplasty, Replacement, Elbow Prosthesis-Related Infections Debridement Anti-Bacterial Agents

Classifications MeSH