Volume Flow and Peak Systolic Velocity of the Arteriovenous Circuit in Patients after Percutaneous Deep Venous Arterialization.
chronic limb threatening ischemia
duplex ultrasound
endovascular
peak systolic velocity
peripheral arterial disease
venous arterialization
volume flow
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Sep 2020
28 Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
31
08
2020
revised:
23
09
2020
accepted:
26
09
2020
entrez:
1
10
2020
pubmed:
2
10
2020
medline:
2
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Percutaneous deep venous arterialization (pDVA) is a developing technique for limb salvage in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia by creating an arteriovenous (AV) circuit. After pDVA, patency of the AV circuit is evaluated using duplex ultrasound (DUS) imaging. Peak systolic velocity (PSV) and volume flow (VF) values for maintaining a patent AV circuit are undefined; therefore, guidance about when a reintervention should be performed is lacking. The objective of this study was to interpret post-pDVA PSV and VF values in relation to AV circuit preservation. This was performed by analyzing DUS results of 22 post-pDVA patients. A total of 670 PSV and 623 VF measurements were collected. A PSV value of ≤55 cm/s and a VF value of ≤195 mL/min were found predictive for failure. The reliability of PSV and VF measurements in patent AV-circuits was good (intraclass correlation coefficient; PSV, 0.85; VF, 0.88). In conclusion, this study is the first to analyze DUS measurements in post-pDVA patients and showed that DUS can be used to anticipate for failure. The thresholds found can be used to help interpret DUS measurements in post-pDVA patients. More research in a larger patient population is needed to prospectively validate these thresholds.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32998196
pii: diagnostics10100760
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10100760
pmc: PMC7601062
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Oct;24(5):619-626
pubmed: 28697694
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Mar;63(3):646-51
pubmed: 26620716
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Mar;53(3):387-402
pubmed: 28027892
Am J Nephrol. 1998;18(4):296-304
pubmed: 9653833
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jan;45 Suppl S:S5-67
pubmed: 17223489
Presse Med. 2018 Jan;47(1):38-46
pubmed: 29449058
J Vasc Surg. 1995 Jan;21(1):16-22; discussion 22-5
pubmed: 7823355
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Sep;44(3):496-502
pubmed: 16950423
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Aug;27(4):658-665
pubmed: 32419597
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Aug;35:68-74
pubmed: 27263815
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58(1S):S1-S109.e33
pubmed: 31182334
Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 May;25(4):454-60
pubmed: 21549912
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Feb;23(1):83-91
pubmed: 26442951
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2018 Oct;59(5):665-669
pubmed: 29786410
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Jun;55(6):757-818
pubmed: 29730128
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017 May;40(4):236-240
pubmed: 28390709
J Vasc Surg. 2001 Feb;33(2):273-8; discussion 278-80
pubmed: 11174778