Association between Genetic and Immunological Background of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Expression of Programmed Cell Death-1.
Cancer stem cell
Cell signal
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Immune checkpoint inhibitors
Mutation
Journal
Liver cancer
ISSN: 2235-1795
Titre abrégé: Liver Cancer
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101597993
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
12
12
2019
accepted:
03
02
2020
entrez:
1
10
2020
pubmed:
2
10
2020
medline:
2
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Immune checkpoint inhibitors are promising agents for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) refractory to conventional therapies. To enhance the efficacy of this treatment, immunological and molecular characteristics of HCC with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) should be explored. Clinical backgrounds, PD-L1 expression, and the amount of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating mononuclear cells (TIMCs) were analyzed in 154 HCCs. The expression of 3 stem cell markers and co-inhibitory receptors on tumor cells and TIMCs, respectively, were examined by immunohistochemical analysis. Somatic mutations in the 409 cancer-associated genes and TERT promoter were determined; HCCs were classified based on the presence of gene alterations affecting the 8 oncogenic pathways. The results were validated using the dataset from the Cancer Genome Atlas. The expression of PD-L1 in the HCCs was positively correlated with progressive tumor features, the presence of cytokeratin 19 (CK19), Sal-like protein 4 (SALL4), and the mutations of genes involving the phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt pathway. Although CD8+ cells were densely infiltrated in PD-L1-positive tumors, these TIMCs frequently expressed multiple co-inhibitory receptors. However, a subset of PD-L1-positive tumors characterized by activating mutations of the PI3K-Akt pathway showed a low degree of TIMCs. Conversely, PD-L1-negative HCCs were associated with mutations in the β-catenin pathway and a small number of TIMCs, although the expression of co-inhibitory receptors was rare. PD-L1-positive HCCs frequently showed an inflamed phenotype with stem cell features; a subset of PD-L1-positive HCCs with mutations in the PI3K-Akt pathway showed a non-inflamed phenotype. In HCCs with dense infiltration of TIMCs, CD8+ cells expressed multiple co-inhibitory receptors, suggesting T cell exhaustion. On the other hand, PD-L1-negative HCCs showed mutations leading to β-catenin activation and exhibited a non-inflamed background. These characteristics should be taken into consideration for developing novel combination therapies using immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
OBJECTIVE
Immune checkpoint inhibitors are promising agents for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) refractory to conventional therapies. To enhance the efficacy of this treatment, immunological and molecular characteristics of HCC with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) should be explored.
METHODS
METHODS
Clinical backgrounds, PD-L1 expression, and the amount of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating mononuclear cells (TIMCs) were analyzed in 154 HCCs. The expression of 3 stem cell markers and co-inhibitory receptors on tumor cells and TIMCs, respectively, were examined by immunohistochemical analysis. Somatic mutations in the 409 cancer-associated genes and TERT promoter were determined; HCCs were classified based on the presence of gene alterations affecting the 8 oncogenic pathways. The results were validated using the dataset from the Cancer Genome Atlas.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The expression of PD-L1 in the HCCs was positively correlated with progressive tumor features, the presence of cytokeratin 19 (CK19), Sal-like protein 4 (SALL4), and the mutations of genes involving the phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt pathway. Although CD8+ cells were densely infiltrated in PD-L1-positive tumors, these TIMCs frequently expressed multiple co-inhibitory receptors. However, a subset of PD-L1-positive tumors characterized by activating mutations of the PI3K-Akt pathway showed a low degree of TIMCs. Conversely, PD-L1-negative HCCs were associated with mutations in the β-catenin pathway and a small number of TIMCs, although the expression of co-inhibitory receptors was rare.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
PD-L1-positive HCCs frequently showed an inflamed phenotype with stem cell features; a subset of PD-L1-positive HCCs with mutations in the PI3K-Akt pathway showed a non-inflamed phenotype. In HCCs with dense infiltration of TIMCs, CD8+ cells expressed multiple co-inhibitory receptors, suggesting T cell exhaustion. On the other hand, PD-L1-negative HCCs showed mutations leading to β-catenin activation and exhibited a non-inflamed background. These characteristics should be taken into consideration for developing novel combination therapies using immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32999869
doi: 10.1159/000506352
pii: lic-0009-0426
pmc: PMC7506256
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
426-439Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
N.N. received research grants from Gilead Sciences. M.K. received research grants from Taiho Pharmaceuticals, Chugai Pharmaceuticals, Otsuka, Takeda, Sumitomo Dainippon-Sumitomo, Daiichi Sankyo, AbbVie, Astellas Pharma, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; grants and personal fees from MSD, Eisai, and Bayer; and is an adviser for MSD, Eisai, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, and ONO Pharmaceutical. All other authors have nothing to declare.
Références
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Dec;12(12):681-700
pubmed: 26484443
Lancet. 2017 Jun 24;389(10088):2492-2502
pubmed: 28434648
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 14;6:36956
pubmed: 27841362
Nat Genet. 2014 Dec;46(12):1267-73
pubmed: 25362482
Dig Dis. 2016;34(6):708-713
pubmed: 27750242
N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 11;380(15):1450-1462
pubmed: 30970190
Nat Commun. 2013;4:2218
pubmed: 23887712
Gastroenterology. 2017 Sep;153(3):812-826
pubmed: 28624577
Cancers (Basel). 2018 Oct 30;10(11):
pubmed: 30380773
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 13;368(24):2266-76
pubmed: 23758232
Int J Cancer. 2018 Aug 15;143(4):931-943
pubmed: 29516506
Hepatol Res. 2018 Jul;48(8):622-634
pubmed: 29734514
Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jan;49(1):246-254
pubmed: 27456947
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct;15(10):599-616
pubmed: 30061739
Hepatology. 2016 Dec;64(6):2038-2046
pubmed: 27359084
Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Sep;49:1-12
pubmed: 27395773
Pathol Int. 2017 Mar;67(3):163-170
pubmed: 28139862
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jul;19(7):940-952
pubmed: 29875066
Nat Genet. 2012 Jun 24;44(8):928-33
pubmed: 22729222
Nat Genet. 2012 May 06;44(6):694-8
pubmed: 22561517
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Oct 1;20(19):5064-74
pubmed: 24714771
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Feb 1;19(3):598-609
pubmed: 23095323
Oncogene. 2019 May;38(18):3371-3386
pubmed: 30635656
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 21;7(1):8869
pubmed: 28827755
Cancer Res. 2009 Sep 15;69(18):7385-92
pubmed: 19723656
J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;50(1):65-75
pubmed: 24509608
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Apr 1;25(7):2116-2126
pubmed: 30373752
Gastroenterology. 2018 Dec;155(6):1936-1950.e17
pubmed: 30145359
Nat Commun. 2018 May 15;9(1):1908
pubmed: 29765039
J Hepatol. 2010 Feb;52(2):280-1
pubmed: 20006402
Ann Oncol. 2016 Mar;27(3):409-16
pubmed: 26681673
Gastroenterology. 2017 Oct;153(4):1107-1119.e10
pubmed: 28648905
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Dec 1;23(23):7333-7339
pubmed: 28928158
Hum Pathol. 2016 Apr;50:24-33
pubmed: 26997435
Nat Genet. 2015 May;47(5):505-511
pubmed: 25822088
Cancers (Basel). 2018 Sep 29;10(10):
pubmed: 30274313
J Clin Pathol. 2019 Sep;72(9):588-596
pubmed: 31126975
Hepatology. 2018 Sep;68(3):1025-1041
pubmed: 29603348
Nat Med. 2007 Jan;13(1):84-8
pubmed: 17159987
Oncology. 2017;93 Suppl 1:160-164
pubmed: 29258072
Hepatology. 2017 Dec;66(6):1920-1933
pubmed: 28732118
Nature. 2016 May 23;534(7607):402-6
pubmed: 27281199
J Hepatol. 2015 Dec;63(6):1368-77
pubmed: 26220754
Gut. 2015 Oct;64(10):1593-604
pubmed: 25608525
Dig Dis. 2015 Oct;33(6):771-9
pubmed: 26488287
Nature. 2015 Jul 9;523(7559):231-5
pubmed: 25970248