How Does Vertical Reading Affect Reading Speed?

hemianopia read reading stroke vertical

Journal

The British and Irish orthoptic journal
ISSN: 1743-9868
Titre abrégé: Br Ir Orthopt J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101233819

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Aug 2020
Historique:
entrez: 1 10 2020
pubmed: 2 10 2020
medline: 2 10 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Vertical reading is an adaptive reading strategy sometimes used in homonymous hemianopia. This study aimed to measure horizontal and vertical reading speeds in visually normal volunteers using the Radner Reading Chart. Fifteen orthoptic students, mean age 19.7 years, took part in this repeated measures study. Participants read sentences aloud from the Radner Reading Chart horizontally and rotated vertically, to read up and down the line. Words read correctly and the time taken to read each sentence were recorded. Reading speeds were calculated (words read correctly per second) for horizontal text (2.95 words per second) and for vertical text, reading up the line (1.73 words per second) and reading down the line (1.57 words per second). Reading horizontal text was significantly faster than reading vertical text. Reading horizontal text was 1.22 words per second faster than reading text vertically up (p < 0.0001) and 1.38 words per second faster than text vertically down (p < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between reading text vertically up the line and vertically down the line (0.16 words per second, p = 0.42). Horizontal reading speed, measured with the Radner Reading Chart, was significantly faster than both vertical reading speeds. There was no significant difference between reading vertically up the line and reading vertically down the line. The slower time taken to read the vertically orientated sentences had a greater effect on reading speed than the number of errors made.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32999992
doi: 10.22599/bioj.149
pmc: PMC7510370
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

38-43

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Références

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Nov;248(11):1631-7
pubmed: 20499082
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 6;14(3):e0213035
pubmed: 30840662
Neuropsychologia. 1982;20(5):533-45
pubmed: 7145079
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Sep;91(9):1097-105
pubmed: 25062130
J Physiol. 1988 Oct;404:157-82
pubmed: 3253429
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Jul;28(6):554-63
pubmed: 24407913
Vision Res. 2002 May;42(10):1325-37
pubmed: 12044761
Eur J Neurol. 2016 Jan;23 Suppl 1:1-7
pubmed: 26563092
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:719096
pubmed: 24089687
J Physiol. 1988 Oct;404:183-97
pubmed: 3253430
J Vis. 2010 Feb 23;10(2):21.1-17
pubmed: 20462322
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2016 Dec;38(10):1077-83
pubmed: 27350288
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;68(6):691-706
pubmed: 10811691
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 23;12(1):e0170743
pubmed: 28114373
J AAPOS. 2007 Feb;11(1):52-4
pubmed: 17307684
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004 Jan;242(1):31-9
pubmed: 14666372
Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep 22;8:1919-27
pubmed: 25284978

Auteurs

Kayleigh Porter (K)

Orthoptic Department, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, GB.
Division of Ophthalmology and Orthoptics, Health Sciences School, University of Sheffield, GB.

Gemma Arblaster (G)

Division of Ophthalmology and Orthoptics, Health Sciences School, University of Sheffield, GB.

Classifications MeSH