Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort.
Biopsy
Magnetic resonance imaging
Prostatic neoplasms
Urogenital neoplasms
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
01
07
2020
accepted:
01
09
2020
revised:
28
07
2020
pubmed:
2
10
2020
medline:
15
4
2021
entrez:
1
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The PRECISE recommendations for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) include repeated measurement of each lesion, and attribution of a PRECISE radiological progression score for the likelihood of clinically significant change over time. We aimed to compare the PRECISE score with clinical progression in patients who are managed using an MRI-led AS protocol. A total of 553 patients on AS for low- and intermediate-risk PCa (up to Gleason score 3 + 4) who had two or more MRI scans performed between December 2005 and January 2020 were included. Overall, 2161 scans were retrospectively re-reported by a dedicated radiologist to give a PI-RADS v2 score for each scan and assess the PRECISE score for each follow-up scan. Clinical progression was defined by histological progression to ≥ Gleason score 4 + 3 (Gleason Grade Group 3) and/or initiation of active treatment. Progression-free survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test was used to assess differences between curves. Overall, 165/553 (30%) patients experienced the primary outcome of clinical progression (median follow-up, 74.5 months; interquartile ranges, 53-98). Of all patients, 313/553 (57%) did not show radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 1-3), of which 296/313 (95%) had also no clinical progression. Of the remaining 240/553 patients (43%) with radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 4-5), 146/240 (61%) experienced clinical progression (p < 0.0001). Patients with radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 4-5) showed a trend to an increase in PSA density. Patients without radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 1-3) during AS had a very low likelihood of clinical progression and many could avoid routine re-biopsy. • Patients without radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 1-3) during AS had a very low likelihood of clinical progression and many could avoid routine re-biopsy. • Clinical progression was almost always detectable in patients with radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 4-5) during AS. • Patients with radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 4-5) during AS showed a trend to an increase in PSA density.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33000302
doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07256-z
pii: 10.1007/s00330-020-07256-z
pmc: PMC7880925
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1644-1655Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/S005897/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : University College London
ID : Graduate Research Scholarship
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Eur Urol. 2014 Mar;65(3):628-34
pubmed: 23312572
Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):954-960
pubmed: 27329565
Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Apr;57:34-39
pubmed: 30352271
Eur Radiol. 2017 Nov;27(11):4767-4774
pubmed: 28523355
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Mar;13(3):151-67
pubmed: 26813955
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec 20;34(36):4338-4344
pubmed: 27998216
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun 10;28(17):2810-6
pubmed: 20439642
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):648-655
pubmed: 27349615
BJU Int. 2018 May;121(5):737-744
pubmed: 29247473
Eur Radiol. 2020 Apr;30(4):2082-2090
pubmed: 31844959
Eur Radiol. 2012 Apr;22(4):746-57
pubmed: 22322308
Med J Aust. 2018 Jun 4;208(10):439-443
pubmed: 29793403
J Urol. 2016 May;195(5):1409-1414
pubmed: 26707510
BJU Int. 2018 Dec;122(6):946-958
pubmed: 29679430
Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):250-266
pubmed: 28336078
J Urol. 2016 May;195(5):1421-1427
pubmed: 26674305
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018 Nov;21(4):556-563
pubmed: 30038388
Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):300-309
pubmed: 30017404
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Mar 13;:
pubmed: 30878348
Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Apr;67:50-58
pubmed: 31899283
Eur Urol. 2020 Sep;78(3):443-451
pubmed: 32360049
Eur Urol. 2020 Mar;77(3):311-317
pubmed: 31708295
J Urol. 2017 Apr;197(4):1006-1013
pubmed: 27871928
Eur Radiol. 2020 Nov;30(11):6042-6051
pubmed: 32591887
J Urol. 2016 Sep;196(3):721-6
pubmed: 26946161
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):627-36
pubmed: 25511988
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Feb;7(1):116-131
pubmed: 29594026
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Sep;42(9):2340-2345
pubmed: 28396920
Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16-40
pubmed: 26427566