Timing of radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy (RADICALS-RT): a randomised, controlled phase 3 trial.


Journal

Lancet (London, England)
ISSN: 1474-547X
Titre abrégé: Lancet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985213R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 10 2020
Historique:
received: 31 01 2020
revised: 26 05 2020
accepted: 12 06 2020
pubmed: 2 10 2020
medline: 1 5 2021
entrez: 1 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The optimal timing of radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer is uncertain. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of adjuvant radiotherapy versus an observation policy with salvage radiotherapy for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) biochemical progression. We did a randomised controlled trial enrolling patients with at least one risk factor (pathological T-stage 3 or 4, Gleason score of 7-10, positive margins, or preoperative PSA ≥10 ng/mL) for biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy (RADICALS-RT). The study took place in trial-accredited centres in Canada, Denmark, Ireland, and the UK. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to adjuvant radiotherapy or an observation policy with salvage radiotherapy for PSA biochemical progression (PSA ≥0·1 ng/mL or three consecutive rises). Masking was not deemed feasible. Stratification factors were Gleason score, margin status, planned radiotherapy schedule (52·5 Gy in 20 fractions or 66 Gy in 33 fractions), and centre. The primary outcome measure was freedom from distant metastases, designed with 80% power to detect an improvement from 90% with salvage radiotherapy (control) to 95% at 10 years with adjuvant radiotherapy. We report on biochemical progression-free survival, freedom from non-protocol hormone therapy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. Standard survival analysis methods were used. A hazard ratio (HR) of less than 1 favoured adjuvant radiotherapy. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00541047. Between Nov 22, 2007, and Dec 30, 2016, 1396 patients were randomly assigned, 699 (50%) to salvage radiotherapy and 697 (50%) to adjuvant radiotherapy. Allocated groups were balanced with a median age of 65 years (IQR 60-68). Median follow-up was 4·9 years (IQR 3·0-6·1). 649 (93%) of 697 participants in the adjuvant radiotherapy group reported radiotherapy within 6 months; 228 (33%) of 699 in the salvage radiotherapy group reported radiotherapy within 8 years after randomisation. With 169 events, 5-year biochemical progression-free survival was 85% for those in the adjuvant radiotherapy group and 88% for those in the salvage radiotherapy group (HR 1·10, 95% CI 0·81-1·49; p=0·56). Freedom from non-protocol hormone therapy at 5 years was 93% for those in the adjuvant radiotherapy group versus 92% for those in the salvage radiotherapy group (HR 0·88, 95% CI 0·58-1·33; p=0·53). Self-reported urinary incontinence was worse at 1 year for those in the adjuvant radiotherapy group (mean score 4·8 vs 4·0; p=0·0023). Grade 3-4 urethral stricture within 2 years was reported in 6% of individuals in the adjuvant radiotherapy group versus 4% in the salvage radiotherapy group (p=0·020). These initial results do not support routine administration of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. Adjuvant radiotherapy increases the risk of urinary morbidity. An observation policy with salvage radiotherapy for PSA biochemical progression should be the current standard after radical prostatectomy. Cancer Research UK, MRC Clinical Trials Unit, and Canadian Cancer Society.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The optimal timing of radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer is uncertain. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of adjuvant radiotherapy versus an observation policy with salvage radiotherapy for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) biochemical progression.
METHODS
We did a randomised controlled trial enrolling patients with at least one risk factor (pathological T-stage 3 or 4, Gleason score of 7-10, positive margins, or preoperative PSA ≥10 ng/mL) for biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy (RADICALS-RT). The study took place in trial-accredited centres in Canada, Denmark, Ireland, and the UK. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to adjuvant radiotherapy or an observation policy with salvage radiotherapy for PSA biochemical progression (PSA ≥0·1 ng/mL or three consecutive rises). Masking was not deemed feasible. Stratification factors were Gleason score, margin status, planned radiotherapy schedule (52·5 Gy in 20 fractions or 66 Gy in 33 fractions), and centre. The primary outcome measure was freedom from distant metastases, designed with 80% power to detect an improvement from 90% with salvage radiotherapy (control) to 95% at 10 years with adjuvant radiotherapy. We report on biochemical progression-free survival, freedom from non-protocol hormone therapy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. Standard survival analysis methods were used. A hazard ratio (HR) of less than 1 favoured adjuvant radiotherapy. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00541047.
FINDINGS
Between Nov 22, 2007, and Dec 30, 2016, 1396 patients were randomly assigned, 699 (50%) to salvage radiotherapy and 697 (50%) to adjuvant radiotherapy. Allocated groups were balanced with a median age of 65 years (IQR 60-68). Median follow-up was 4·9 years (IQR 3·0-6·1). 649 (93%) of 697 participants in the adjuvant radiotherapy group reported radiotherapy within 6 months; 228 (33%) of 699 in the salvage radiotherapy group reported radiotherapy within 8 years after randomisation. With 169 events, 5-year biochemical progression-free survival was 85% for those in the adjuvant radiotherapy group and 88% for those in the salvage radiotherapy group (HR 1·10, 95% CI 0·81-1·49; p=0·56). Freedom from non-protocol hormone therapy at 5 years was 93% for those in the adjuvant radiotherapy group versus 92% for those in the salvage radiotherapy group (HR 0·88, 95% CI 0·58-1·33; p=0·53). Self-reported urinary incontinence was worse at 1 year for those in the adjuvant radiotherapy group (mean score 4·8 vs 4·0; p=0·0023). Grade 3-4 urethral stricture within 2 years was reported in 6% of individuals in the adjuvant radiotherapy group versus 4% in the salvage radiotherapy group (p=0·020).
INTERPRETATION
These initial results do not support routine administration of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. Adjuvant radiotherapy increases the risk of urinary morbidity. An observation policy with salvage radiotherapy for PSA biochemical progression should be the current standard after radical prostatectomy.
FUNDING
Cancer Research UK, MRC Clinical Trials Unit, and Canadian Cancer Society.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33002429
pii: S0140-6736(20)31553-1
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31553-1
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0
Prostate-Specific Antigen EC 3.4.21.77

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00541047']

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1413-1421

Subventions

Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 6381
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12023/25
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12023/28
Pays : United Kingdom

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Christopher C Parker (CC)

Department of Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.

Noel W Clarke (NW)

Department of Oncology, Genito-Urinary Cancer Research Group, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK; Department of Surgery, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK; Department of Urology, Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester, UK.

Adrian D Cook (AD)

MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK.

Howard G Kynaston (HG)

Department of Urology, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Peter Meidahl Petersen (PM)

Department of Oncology, Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Charles Catton (C)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

William Cross (W)

Department Of Urology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

John Logue (J)

Department of Oncology, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK.

Wendy Parulekar (W)

Department of Oncology, Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Heather Payne (H)

Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.

Rajendra Persad (R)

Department of Urology, Bristol Urological Institute, North Bristol Hospitals, Bristol, UK.

Holly Pickering (H)

MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK.

Fred Saad (F)

Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Juliette Anderson (J)

Department of Oncology, Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Wakefield, UK.

Amit Bahl (A)

Department of Oncology, Bristol Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, UK.

David Bottomley (D)

St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, UK.

Klaus Brasso (K)

Department of Urology, Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Rohit Chahal (R)

Department of Urology, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.

Peter W Cooke (PW)

Department of Urology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.

Ben Eddy (B)

Department of Urology, East Kent Hospitals University Foundation Trust, Canterbury, UK.

Stephanie Gibbs (S)

Department of Oncology, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford, UK.

Chee Goh (C)

Department of Oncology, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.

Sandeep Gujral (S)

Department of Urology, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford, UK.

Catherine Heath (C)

Department of Clinical Oncology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Alastair Henderson (A)

Department of Urology, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, UK.

Ramasamy Jaganathan (R)

Department of Urology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

Henrik Jakobsen (H)

Department of Urology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.

Nicholas D James (ND)

Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Subramanian Kanaga Sundaram (S)

Department of Urology, Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Wakefield, UK.

Kathryn Lees (K)

Kent Oncology Centre, Maidstone Hospital, Kent, UK.

Jason Lester (J)

Department of Oncology, South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK.

Henriette Lindberg (H)

Department of Oncology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.

Julian Money-Kyrle (J)

Department of Oncology, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.

Stephen Morris (S)

Department of Clinical Oncology, Guys Hospital, London, UK.

Joe O'Sullivan (J)

Department of Clinical Oncology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.

Peter Ostler (P)

Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.

Lisa Owen (L)

Department of Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

Prashant Patel (P)

Department of Urology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

Alvan Pope (A)

Department of Urology, Hillingdon Hospital, Middlesex, UK; Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.

Richard Popert (R)

Department of Urology, Guys Hospital, London, UK.

Rakesh Raman (R)

Department of Clinical Oncology, Kent Oncology Centre, Canterbury, UK.

Martin Andreas Røder (MA)

Department of Urology, Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Ian Sayers (I)

Department of Oncology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.

Matthew Simms (M)

Department of Urology, Hull University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK.

Jim Wilson (J)

Department of Urology, Anuerin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, UK.

Anjali Zarkar (A)

Department of Oncology, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Mahesh K B Parmar (MKB)

MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK.

Matthew R Sydes (MR)

MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK. Electronic address: m.sydes@ucl.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH