Gene flow as a simple cause for an excess of high-frequency-derived alleles.

computer simulation demographic analysis gene flow human genetics human genome natural selection neutral evolution

Journal

Evolutionary applications
ISSN: 1752-4571
Titre abrégé: Evol Appl
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101461828

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Historique:
received: 24 01 2020
revised: 30 04 2020
accepted: 04 05 2020
entrez: 2 10 2020
pubmed: 3 10 2020
medline: 3 10 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Most human populations exhibit an excess of high-frequency variants, leading to a U-shaped site-frequency spectrum (uSFS). This pattern has been generally interpreted as a signature of ongoing episodes of positive selection, or as evidence for a mis-assignment of ancestral/derived allelic states, but uSFS has also been observed in populations receiving gene flow from a ghost population, in structured populations, or after range expansions. In order to better explain the prevalence of high-frequency variants in humans and other populations, we describe here which patterns of gene flow and population demography can lead to uSFS by using extensive coalescent simulations. We find that uSFS can often be observed in a population if gene flow brings a few ancestral alleles from a well-differentiated population. Gene flow can either consist in single pulses of admixture or continuous immigration, but different demographic conditions are necessary to observe uSFS in these two scenarios. Indeed, an extremely low and recent gene flow is required in the case of single admixture events, while with continuous immigration, uSFS occurs only if gene flow started recently at a high rate or if it lasted for a long time at a low rate. Overall, we find that a neutral uSFS occurs under more restrictive conditions in populations having received single pulses of gene flow than in populations exposed to continuous gene flow. We also show that the uSFS observed in human populations from the 1000 Genomes Project can easily be explained by gene flow from surrounding populations without requiring past episodes of positive selection. These results imply that uSFS should be common in non-isolated populations, such as most wild or domesticated plants and animals.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33005222
doi: 10.1111/eva.12998
pii: EVA12998
pmc: PMC7513730
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2254-2263

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None declared.

Références

Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Oct;13(10):745-53
pubmed: 22965354
G3 (Bethesda). 2015 Aug 21;5(10):2165-76
pubmed: 26297726
Conserv Biol. 2009 Jun;23(3):548-56
pubmed: 19210301
Theor Popul Biol. 1983 Jun;23(3):300-13
pubmed: 6623407
Curr Biol. 2017 Aug 21;27(16):2544-2551.e4
pubmed: 28803874
Genetics. 2015 Mar;199(3):841-56
pubmed: 25575536
Evolution. 2002 Aug;56(8):1557-65
pubmed: 12353748
Genetics. 2001 Oct;159(2):893-905
pubmed: 11606561
PLoS Genet. 2014 Aug 14;10(8):e1004530
pubmed: 25122539
Genetics. 1999 Dec;153(4):1863-71
pubmed: 10581291
Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1405-13
pubmed: 10880498
Sci Adv. 2019 Oct 23;5(10):eaaw9206
pubmed: 31681842
Theor Popul Biol. 1995 Oct;48(2):172-97
pubmed: 7482370
Genome Res. 2005 Nov;15(11):1566-75
pubmed: 16251466
Science. 2014 Feb 14;343(6172):747-751
pubmed: 24531965
Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97-159
pubmed: 17246615
Genetics. 2013 Sep;195(1):181-93
pubmed: 23770700
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 26;113(4):E440-9
pubmed: 26712023
Genetics. 1997 May;146(1):295-307
pubmed: 9136019
Elife. 2018 Aug 23;7:
pubmed: 30125248
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Jul;33(7):1711-25
pubmed: 26931140
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 8;115(19):5028-5033
pubmed: 29686078
Theor Popul Biol. 1972 Mar;3(1):87-112
pubmed: 4667078
Am J Hum Genet. 2015 Jun 4;96(6):986-91
pubmed: 26027499
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e18155
pubmed: 21637331
G3 (Bethesda). 2015 Nov 06;6(1):107-20
pubmed: 26546308
Genetics. 2017 May;206(1):439-449
pubmed: 28341655
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2014 Dec;29:22-30
pubmed: 25156518
Genetics. 2017 May;206(1):345-361
pubmed: 28249985
Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 May;29(5):248-51
pubmed: 24702983
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1792-800
pubmed: 17545186
Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Sep;7(9):669-80
pubmed: 16921345
Nature. 2016 Oct 13;538(7624):207-214
pubmed: 27654914
Mol Ecol. 2016 Jan;25(1):79-88
pubmed: 26108992
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 20;116(34):17115-17120
pubmed: 31387977
Nat Rev Genet. 2013 Jun;14(6):404-14
pubmed: 23657479
Theor Popul Biol. 2008 Aug;74(1):104-14
pubmed: 18554676
Plant Physiol. 2009 Feb;149(2):616-24
pubmed: 19019983
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 30;8(1):11422
pubmed: 30061702
Nature. 2019 Jun;570(7760):182-188
pubmed: 31168093
Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Nov;10(11):783-96
pubmed: 19834483
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56371
pubmed: 23418562
Genetics. 2002 Mar;160(3):1179-89
pubmed: 11901132
Mol Ecol. 2004 Apr;13(4):827-36
pubmed: 15012758
Nat Commun. 2014 Dec 23;5:5770
pubmed: 25534655
Evolution. 2000 Aug;54(4):1092-101
pubmed: 11005279
Science. 2006 Jun 16;312(5780):1614-20
pubmed: 16778047
Mol Ecol. 2012 Jan;21(1):28-44
pubmed: 21999307
Science. 2016 Oct 28;354(6311):477-481
pubmed: 27789843
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2018 Dec;53:1-8
pubmed: 29894925
Evolution. 2014 Jan;68(1):1-15
pubmed: 24111567
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Apr 1;34(4):908-924
pubmed: 28087781
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2016 Dec;41:53-61
pubmed: 27584859
Hum Biol. 2006 Aug;78(4):495-508
pubmed: 17278623
Genetics. 2015 Sep;201(1):243-61
pubmed: 26205988
Zoology (Jena). 2016 Aug;119(4):322-9
pubmed: 27106015
Genetics. 2012 Nov;192(3):1065-93
pubmed: 22960212
Mol Ecol. 2004 Apr;13(4):853-64
pubmed: 15012760
Curr Biol. 2020 Jan 6;30(1):101-107.e3
pubmed: 31866368
Genetics. 2002 Feb;160(2):765-77
pubmed: 11861577
BMC Evol Biol. 2019 Jun 27;19(1):135
pubmed: 31248363
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Aug 27;365(1552):2531-9
pubmed: 20643743
Genetics. 2010 Jul;185(3):907-22
pubmed: 20407129
Mol Ecol. 2014 Jun;23(11):2637-52
pubmed: 24750385
Nat Genet. 2014 Aug;46(8):919-25
pubmed: 24952747
Genetics. 2003 Nov;165(3):1619-22
pubmed: 14668409
Genome Biol Evol. 2018 Mar 1;10(3):939-955
pubmed: 29608730
PeerJ. 2015 Feb 24;3:e786
pubmed: 25755922
Genetics. 2001 Dec;159(4):1779-88
pubmed: 11779814
Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Aug;8(8):610-8
pubmed: 17637733
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 1;102(44):15942-7
pubmed: 16243969
PLoS Genet. 2013 Oct;9(10):e1003905
pubmed: 24204310
Genetics. 2006 Nov;174(3):1431-9
pubmed: 16951063
J Biosoc Sci. 1985 Oct;17(4):405-14
pubmed: 4055830
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Nov 7;281(1794):20141369
pubmed: 25253456
Genetics. 2017 Nov;207(3):1103-1119
pubmed: 28951530
Genes (Basel). 2010 Jun 25;1(1):124-42
pubmed: 24710014
Science. 2015 Aug 21;349(6250):aab3884
pubmed: 26198033
PeerJ. 2018 Jul 30;6:e5198
pubmed: 30083438
Mol Ecol. 2005 Jan;14(1):67-73
pubmed: 15643951
Genetics. 2008 Jan;178(1):325-37
pubmed: 17947441
Genetics. 2001 Jun;158(2):657-65
pubmed: 11404330
Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1415-27
pubmed: 10880499
Science. 2014 Jun 13;344(6189):1272-5
pubmed: 24926018
Hum Mol Genet. 2002 Oct 1;11(20):2507-15
pubmed: 12351587
Science. 2017 Nov 3;358(6363):659-662
pubmed: 28982795

Auteurs

Nina Marchi (N)

CMPG Institute of Ecology and Evolution University of Berne Berne Switzerland.
Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics Lausanne Switzerland.

Laurent Excoffier (L)

CMPG Institute of Ecology and Evolution University of Berne Berne Switzerland.
Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics Lausanne Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH