Alternative reproductive tactics are associated with sperm performance in invasive round goby from two different salinity environments.
Journal
Ecology and evolution
ISSN: 2045-7758
Titre abrégé: Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101566408
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
01
07
2019
revised:
16
07
2020
accepted:
20
07
2020
entrez:
2
10
2020
pubmed:
3
10
2020
medline:
3
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
During male-male competition, evolution can favor alternative reproductive tactics. This often results in a dominant morph that holds a resource, such as a nest for egg laying, which competes with a smaller sneaker morph that reproduces by stealing fertilizations. The salinity environment can influence male growth rates, for example, via osmoregulatory costs, which in turn may influence the use of sneaker tactics for small males competing for mating opportunities. Salinity can also affect sperm directly; however, little is known of how salinity influences sneaker tactics through sperm performance. We sampled males of the invasive round goby (
Identifiants
pubmed: 33005358
doi: 10.1002/ece3.6657
pii: ECE36657
pmc: PMC7520214
doi:
Banques de données
Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.j0zpc86c0']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
9981-9999Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Evolution. 2017 Oct;71(10):2510-2521
pubmed: 28791680
Ecology. 2011 Jan;92(1):3-10
pubmed: 21560670
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1937 Aug;23(8):461-7
pubmed: 16577795
Biometrics. 1982 Sep;38(3):641-50
pubmed: 6756494
J Exp Biol. 2018 Jul 30;221(Pt 14):
pubmed: 29844197
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 19;12(4):e0176038
pubmed: 28423029
Curr Biol. 2004 Jan 6;14(1):44-7
pubmed: 14711413
BMC Genomics. 2017 Feb 16;18(1):177
pubmed: 28209125
J Exp Biol. 2006 Nov;209(Pt 21):4230-7
pubmed: 17050838
Am Nat. 2000 Sep;156(3):266-275
pubmed: 29587505
J Exp Biol. 2015 Jun;218(Pt 12):1907-14
pubmed: 26085667
J Fish Biol. 2010 May;76(7):1609-25
pubmed: 20557619
Evol Appl. 2019 Sep 28;13(3):533-544
pubmed: 32431734
J Evol Biol. 2006 Sep;19(5):1641-50
pubmed: 16910993
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 30;280(1755):20122891
pubmed: 23363633
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Oct;22(10):522-8
pubmed: 17919770
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 3;12(4):e0174828
pubmed: 28369128
J Theor Biol. 1996 May 21;180(2):141-50
pubmed: 8763365
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Mar 22;267(1443):531-4
pubmed: 10787153
Cell Biol Int. 2006 Jan;30(1):1-14
pubmed: 16278089
Cell Tissue Res. 1993 Mar;271(3):537-44
pubmed: 7682478
Biol Open. 2019 Mar 27;8(3):
pubmed: 30837224
Genes (Basel). 2019 Mar 14;10(3):
pubmed: 30875862
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Nov 22;268(1483):2375-81
pubmed: 11703878
Ecol Evol. 2016 Jan 11;6(3):707-15
pubmed: 26865959
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1494-1502
pubmed: 27620283
Mol Ecol. 2009 Jan;18(1):64-79
pubmed: 19140965
J Theor Biol. 1998 Jun 21;192(4):445-453
pubmed: 9782102
Sci Adv. 2018 May 23;4(5):eaap8563
pubmed: 29806019
Theriogenology. 2015 Jan 1;83(1):1-13
pubmed: 25442393
Theriogenology. 2019 Jul 1;132:144-152
pubmed: 31022604
Am Nat. 1997 May;149(5):933-54
pubmed: 18811256
Theriogenology. 2007 Feb;67(3):661-72
pubmed: 17137620
Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Jun 1;13(6):222-7
pubmed: 21238275
Trends Ecol Evol. 1996 Feb;11(2):92-8
pubmed: 21237769
J Fish Biol. 2011 Jun;78(7):1993-2009
pubmed: 21651546
J Fish Biol. 2012 Feb;80(2):235-85
pubmed: 22268429
Biol Reprod. 1995 Aug;53(2):276-84
pubmed: 7492679
Insect Mol Biol. 2004 Apr;13(2):141-6
pubmed: 15056361
Mol Ecol. 2001 Feb;10(2):461-9
pubmed: 11298960
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010 Nov;85(4):897-934
pubmed: 20560928
J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol. 2004 Feb 1;301(2):177-85
pubmed: 14743517
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Jan;20(1):46-53
pubmed: 16701340