Sex-specific prevalence and outcomes of frailty in critically ill patients.
Critical care
Female
Frailty
Mechanical ventilation
Mortality
Outcomes
Renal replacement therapy
Sex
Journal
Journal of intensive care
ISSN: 2052-0492
Titre abrégé: J Intensive Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101627304
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
25
08
2020
accepted:
22
09
2020
entrez:
2
10
2020
pubmed:
3
10
2020
medline:
3
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The prevalence of frailty, an important risk factor for short- and long-term outcomes in hospitalized adults, differs by sex. Studies in critically ill adults have also found differences in mortality and organ support rates in males and females. The objective of this study was to determine if these observed differences in mortality and organ support rates can be explained by sex and frailty alone, or if the interaction between sex and frailty is an important risk factor. This is a retrospective multi-centre population-based cohort study of all adult patients (≥ 18 years) admitted to the seventeen intensive care units (ICUs) across Alberta, Canada, between 2016 and 2017. On admission, physicians assigned a Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score (1 = very fit, 9 = terminally ill) to all patients. Patients with missing CFS scores or who died within 24 h of ICU admission were excluded. Frailty was defined as CFS ≥ 5. Outcomes included all-cause hospital mortality, ICU mortality, and organ support rates. A propensity score for female sex was generated and 1:1 matching on sex was performed. Multivariable Cox regression or logistic regression, as appropriate, was performed to evaluate the association between sex, frailty, and the sex-frailty interaction term with outcomes. Of 15,238 patients included in the cohort, after propensity score matching 11,816 patients remained (mean [standard deviation] age 57.3 [16.9]). In the matched cohort, females had a higher prevalence of frailty than males (32% vs. 27%, respectively) and higher odds of frailty (odds ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] 1.29 [1.20-1.40]). Though females were less likely to receive invasive mechanical ventilation (hazard ratio [95% CI] 0.78 [0.71-0.86]), the interaction between sex and frailty (i.e., males and females with and without frailty) was not associated with differences in organ support rates. Receipt of dialysis and vasoactive support, as well as hospital mortality and ICU mortality were associated with frailty but were not associated with female sex or the interaction between sex and frailty. Although frailty and sex were individually associated with mortality and differences in organ support in the ICU, there does not appear to be a significant interaction between sex and frailty with regards to these outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The prevalence of frailty, an important risk factor for short- and long-term outcomes in hospitalized adults, differs by sex. Studies in critically ill adults have also found differences in mortality and organ support rates in males and females. The objective of this study was to determine if these observed differences in mortality and organ support rates can be explained by sex and frailty alone, or if the interaction between sex and frailty is an important risk factor.
METHODS
METHODS
This is a retrospective multi-centre population-based cohort study of all adult patients (≥ 18 years) admitted to the seventeen intensive care units (ICUs) across Alberta, Canada, between 2016 and 2017. On admission, physicians assigned a Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score (1 = very fit, 9 = terminally ill) to all patients. Patients with missing CFS scores or who died within 24 h of ICU admission were excluded. Frailty was defined as CFS ≥ 5. Outcomes included all-cause hospital mortality, ICU mortality, and organ support rates. A propensity score for female sex was generated and 1:1 matching on sex was performed. Multivariable Cox regression or logistic regression, as appropriate, was performed to evaluate the association between sex, frailty, and the sex-frailty interaction term with outcomes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of 15,238 patients included in the cohort, after propensity score matching 11,816 patients remained (mean [standard deviation] age 57.3 [16.9]). In the matched cohort, females had a higher prevalence of frailty than males (32% vs. 27%, respectively) and higher odds of frailty (odds ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] 1.29 [1.20-1.40]). Though females were less likely to receive invasive mechanical ventilation (hazard ratio [95% CI] 0.78 [0.71-0.86]), the interaction between sex and frailty (i.e., males and females with and without frailty) was not associated with differences in organ support rates. Receipt of dialysis and vasoactive support, as well as hospital mortality and ICU mortality were associated with frailty but were not associated with female sex or the interaction between sex and frailty.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Although frailty and sex were individually associated with mortality and differences in organ support in the ICU, there does not appear to be a significant interaction between sex and frailty with regards to these outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33005426
doi: 10.1186/s40560-020-00494-9
pii: 494
pmc: PMC7525935
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
75Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsDr. Bagshaw is supported by a Canada Research Chair in Critical Care Nephrology. Dr. Stelfox is supported by CIHR Embedded Clinician Researcher Award.
Références
CMAJ. 2014 Feb 4;186(2):E95-102
pubmed: 24277703
CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95
pubmed: 16129869
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Aug;43(8):1105-1122
pubmed: 28676896
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jul 1;196(1):64-72
pubmed: 27922747
Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818-29
pubmed: 3928249
Can J Anaesth. 2019 Nov;66(11):1310-1319
pubmed: 31144259
CMAJ. 2007 Dec 4;177(12):1513-9
pubmed: 18003954
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Sep;44(9):1512-1520
pubmed: 30105600
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jan 12;164(1):61-5
pubmed: 14718323
Crit Care. 2017 May 31;21(1):121
pubmed: 28558806
Stat Med. 2014 Mar 30;33(7):1242-58
pubmed: 24122911
Int J Public Health. 2019 Sep;64(7):1025-1036
pubmed: 31236603
Crit Care. 2012 May 22;16(3):R92
pubmed: 22617003
Exp Gerontol. 2017 Mar;89:30-40
pubmed: 28043934
J Crit Care. 2018 Oct;47:295-301
pubmed: 30099330
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Jul;22(7):707-10
pubmed: 8844239
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Oct;21(10):1031-1039
pubmed: 27267783
Interdiscip Top Gerontol Geriatr. 2015;41:41-53
pubmed: 26301978