Optical and Visual Quality With Physical and Visually Simulated Presbyopic Multifocal Contact Lenses.
multifocal contact lenses
presbyopia
visual simulators
Journal
Translational vision science & technology
ISSN: 2164-2591
Titre abrégé: Transl Vis Sci Technol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101595919
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
received:
30
06
2020
accepted:
24
08
2020
entrez:
2
10
2020
pubmed:
3
10
2020
medline:
3
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
As multifocal contact lenses (MCLs) expand as a solution for presbyopia correction, a better understanding of their optical and visual performance becomes essential. Also, providing subjects with the experience of multifocal vision before contact lens fitting becomes critical, both to systematically test different multifocal designs and to optimize selection in the clinic. In this study, we evaluated the ability of a simultaneous vision visual simulator (SimVis) to represent MCLs. Through focus (TF) optical and visual quality with a center-near aspheric MCL (low, medium and high near adds) were measured using a multichannel polychromatic Adaptive Optics visual simulator equipped with double-pass, SimVis (temporal multiplexing), and psychophysical channels to allow measurements on-bench and in vivo TF optical (on bench and in vivo) and visual (in vivo) quality measurements captured the expected broadening of the curves with increasing add. Root mean square difference between real and SimVis-simulated lens was 0.031/0.025 (low add), 0.025/0.015 (medium add), 0.019/0.011 (high add), for TF DP and TF LogMAR VA, respectively. A shape similarity metric shows high statistical values (lag κ = 0), rho = 0.811/0.895 (low add), 0.792/0.944 (medium add), and 0.861/0.915 (high add) for TF DP/LogMAR VA, respectively. MCLs theoretically and effectively expand the depth of focus. A novel simulator, SimVis, captured the through-focus optical and visual performance of the MCL in most of the subjects. Visual simulators allow subjects to experience vision with multifocal lenses prior to testing them on-eye. Simultaneous visual simulators allow subjects to experience multifocal vision non-invasively. We demonstrated equivalency between real multifocal contact lenses and SimVis-simulated lenses. The results suggest that SimVis is a suitable technique to aid selection of presbyopic corrections in the contactology practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33005478
doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.10.20
pii: TVST-20-2791
pmc: PMC7509762
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
20Informations de copyright
Copyright 2020 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure: M. Vinas, 2EyesVision (F); S. Aissati, None; A.M. Gonzalez-Ramos, None; M. Romero, None; L. Sawides, 2EyesVision (E, F); V. Akondi, 2EyesVision (F); E. Gambra, 2EyesVision (E, F); C. Dorronsoro, 2EyesVision (E, F); T. Karkkainen, Johnson & Johnson Vision (E); D. Nankivil, Johnson & Johnson Vision (E); S. Marcos, 2EyesVision (F)
Références
Clin Exp Optom. 2020 Jan;103(1):21-30
pubmed: 31734940
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 24;9(3):e93089
pubmed: 24664087
Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Feb;93(2):141-9
pubmed: 26704141
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 7;9(1):1539
pubmed: 30733540
J Vis. 2004 Apr 23;4(4):310-21
pubmed: 15134478
Biomed Opt Express. 2016 Oct 03;7(11):4388-4399
pubmed: 27895981
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
pubmed: 9176953
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Sep;42(9):1276-1287
pubmed: 27697245
J Refract Surg. 1997 Jul-Aug;13(4):388-91
pubmed: 9268940
Optom Vis Sci. 2006 May;83(5):266-73
pubmed: 16699438
Vision Res. 2017 Mar;132:85-96
pubmed: 27484778
Opt Express. 2019 Feb 4;27(3):2085-2100
pubmed: 30732252
Biomed Opt Express. 2015 Feb 24;6(3):948-62
pubmed: 25798317
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jan 17;54(1):415-22
pubmed: 23233256
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2003 Jul;23(4):347-60
pubmed: 12828625
Optom Vis Sci. 2018 Dec;95(12):1096-1104
pubmed: 30451806
Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Feb;92(2):175-82
pubmed: 25525891
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014 Aug;37(4):278-84
pubmed: 24582868
Clin Exp Optom. 2008 May;91(3):265-78
pubmed: 18201225
Biomed Opt Express. 2017 Mar 03;8(4):2055-2068
pubmed: 28736655
Clin Exp Optom. 2017 Mar;100(2):107-127
pubmed: 27800638
Eye Contact Lens. 2018 Sep;44 Suppl 1:S131-S137
pubmed: 28060146
Vision Res. 2011 Jul 15;51(14):1648-58
pubmed: 21609729
Biomed Opt Express. 2018 Nov 15;9(12):6302-6317
pubmed: 31065430
Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Oct 09;13:1991-1996
pubmed: 31631967
Optom Vis Sci. 2017 Feb;94(2):183-196
pubmed: 27748699
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015 Oct;38(5):317-21
pubmed: 25899637
Clin Exp Optom. 2012 Jan;95(1):54-9
pubmed: 22070196
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Jan;34(1):8-29
pubmed: 24205890
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2016 Apr;79(2):73-7
pubmed: 27224066
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013 Jan;33(1):42-50
pubmed: 23199097
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Dec;45(12):4601-10
pubmed: 15557473
Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Feb;86(2):E98-105
pubmed: 19156009
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jun;35(6):992-7
pubmed: 19465282
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
pubmed: 9176952
J Vis. 2004 Apr 23;4(4):322-8
pubmed: 15134479
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002 May;22(3):221-33
pubmed: 12090637
Biomed Opt Express. 2017 Jun 23;8(7):3410-3425
pubmed: 28717577
Vision Res. 1999 Jun;39(12):2039-49
pubmed: 10343788
Optom Vis Sci. 2002 Apr;79(4):234-40
pubmed: 11999149
Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Aug;89(8):1107-18
pubmed: 22820470
Biomed Opt Express. 2019 Oct 21;10(11):5801-5817
pubmed: 31799048
Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Jan;83(1):57-9
pubmed: 16432474
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1995 Feb;12(2):195-201
pubmed: 7869151