How the COVID-19 Wave Changed Emergency Urology: Results From an Academic Tertiary Referral Hospital in the Epicentre of the Italian Red Zone.
Academic Medical Centers
/ standards
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
COVID-19
/ epidemiology
Communicable Disease Control
/ standards
Emergency Service, Hospital
/ statistics & numerical data
Emergency Treatment
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Humans
Italy
/ epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Pandemics
/ prevention & control
Patient Admission
/ standards
Patient Discharge
/ standards
Referral and Consultation
/ statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
SARS-CoV-2
/ pathogenicity
Tertiary Care Centers
/ standards
Urologic Diseases
/ diagnosis
Urologic Surgical Procedures
/ statistics & numerical data
Journal
Urology
ISSN: 1527-9995
Titre abrégé: Urology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0366151
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
received:
03
06
2020
revised:
07
09
2020
accepted:
20
09
2020
pubmed:
4
10
2020
medline:
13
1
2021
entrez:
3
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To quantify and characterize the burden of urological patients admitted to emergency department (ED) in Lombardy during Italian COVID-19 outbreak, comparing it to a reference population from 2019. We retrospectively analysed all consecutive admissions to ED from 1 January to 9 April in both 2019 and 2020. According to the ED discharge ICD-9-CM code, patients were grouped in urological and respiratory patients. We evaluated the type of access (self-presented/ambulance), discharge priority code, ED discharge (hospitalization, home), need for urological consultation or urgent surgery. The number of urological diagnoses in ED was inversely associated to COVID-19 diagnoses (95% confidence interval -0.41/-0.19; Beta = -0.8; P < .0001). The average access per day was significantly lower after 10 March 2020 (1.5 ± 1.1 vs 6.5 ± 2.6; P < .0001), compared to reference period. From 11 March 2020, the inappropriate admissions to ED were reduced (10/45 vs 96/195; P = .001). Consequently, the patients admitted were generally more demanding, requiring a higher rate of urgent surgeries (4/45 vs 4/195; P = .02). This reflected in an increase of the hospitalization rate from 12.7% to 17.8% (Beta = 0.88; P < .0001) during 2020. Urological admissions to ED during lockdown differed from the same period of 2019 both qualitatively and quantitatively. The spectrum of patients seems to be relatively more critical, often requiring an urgent management. These patients may represent a challenge due to the difficult circumstances caused by the pandemic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33010292
pii: S0090-4295(20)31186-9
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.028
pmc: PMC7527349
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
43-49Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 2;383(1):88-89
pubmed: 32343497
JAMA. 2020 Apr 28;323(16):1574-1581
pubmed: 32250385
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Apr;29(2):319-326
pubmed: 26931325
Eur Urol. 2020 Jun;77(6):663-666
pubmed: 32279903
Eur Urol. 2020 Jul;78(1):16-20
pubmed: 32362498
Nat Rev Urol. 2020 May;17(5):251-253
pubmed: 32203310
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Apr 05;21:100331
pubmed: 32292899
Health Serv Res. 2014 Aug;49(4):1290-305
pubmed: 24495258
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Oct;13(5):507-14
pubmed: 25854901
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Jun;72(3):369-375
pubmed: 32202401
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 May;8(5):e641-e642
pubmed: 32199072