How can process safety and a risk management approach guide pandemic risk management?
Layers of protection
Neural network
Non-pharmaceutical interventions
Pandemic
Process monitoring
Risk
Journal
Journal of loss prevention in the process industries
ISSN: 0950-4230
Titre abrégé: J Loss Prev Process Ind
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101660977
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
07
07
2020
revised:
20
09
2020
accepted:
25
09
2020
pubmed:
6
10
2020
medline:
6
10
2020
entrez:
5
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) brought the world to a halt in March 2020. Various prediction and risk management approaches are being explored worldwide for decision making. This work adopts an advanced mechanistic model and utilizes tools for process safety to propose a framework for risk management for the current pandemic. A parameter tweaking and an artificial neural network-based parameter learning model have been developed for effective forecasting of the dynamic risk. Monte Carlo simulation was used to capture the randomness of the model parameters. A comparative analysis of the proposed methodologies has been carried out by using the susceptible, exposed, infected, quarantined, recovered, deceased (SEIQRD) model. A SEIQRD model was developed for four distinct locations: Italy, Germany, Ontario, and British Columbia. The learning-based approach resulted in better outcomes among the models tested in the present study. The layer of protection analysis is a useful framework to analyze the effect of different safety measures. This framework is used in this work to study the effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions on pandemic risk. The risk profiles suggest that a stage-wise releasing scenario is the most suitable approach with negligible resurgence. The case study provides valuable insights to practitioners in both the health sector and the process industries to implement advanced strategies for risk assessment and management. Both sectors can benefit from each other by using the mathematical models and the management tools used in each, and, more importantly, the lessons learned from crises.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33013002
doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104310
pii: S0950-4230(20)30597-0
pmc: PMC7525359
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
104310Informations de copyright
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;20(6):678-688
pubmed: 32213332
Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):931-934
pubmed: 32164834
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 28;382(22):2158-2160
pubmed: 32329972
Virol J. 2013 May 31;10:172
pubmed: 23724961
Math Biosci. 1999 Sep;160(2):191-213
pubmed: 10472754
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2017 Sep;11(5):434-444
pubmed: 28703921
Math Biosci. 2002 Nov-Dec;180:141-60
pubmed: 12387921
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018 Oct 08;8:343
pubmed: 30349811
Nature. 2005 Sep 8;437(7056):209-14
pubmed: 16079797
Science. 2003 Jun 20;300(5627):1966-70
pubmed: 12766207
Acta Paediatr. 2020 Jul;109(7):1323-1325
pubmed: 32289175
J Hazard Mater. 2006 Mar 31;130(3):307-10
pubmed: 16139426
Water Res. 2012 Feb 1;46(2):521-30
pubmed: 22137448
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Jul;5(7):e375-e385
pubmed: 32502389
J Travel Med. 2020 Mar 13;27(2):
pubmed: 32052846
J Public Health Policy. 2009 Sep;30(3):328-41
pubmed: 19806073
Nature. 2006 Jul 27;442(7101):448-52
pubmed: 16642006
J Math Biol. 1990;28(3):257-70
pubmed: 2332704
Math Biosci. 2003 Mar;182(1):1-25
pubmed: 12547037
Bull Math Biol. 2020 Apr 8;82(4):52
pubmed: 32270376
J Hazard Mater. 2008 Nov 15;159(1):19-24
pubmed: 18692311
Epidemics. 2019 Sep;28:100348
pubmed: 31235334
Nature. 1979 Aug 2;280(5721):361-7
pubmed: 460412